|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:09 AM Original message |
In the astonishly remote likelihood that Kucinich *doesn't* clinch the nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
1. Yes. After 2000, I'm surprised that anyone wouldn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Well, even though Hillary votes 93% of the time with the democratic majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:21 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. What were the 7% where she went against the party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:21 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. The only 7% that counts, apparently n.t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:26 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Good question: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
againes654 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
3. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
4. Yes I will, but this is the first time in my life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:21 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. yeah, me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:24 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. lol, I think the only thing we agree on here, is that Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 01:25 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. yeah, me too, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
8. If the candidate is DLC, a corporatist, or a war-monger, NO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:26 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. so you'll be that kid with the violin staring out the window as the cool kids go vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 09:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. Since none of the Democrats running are corporatists, I'll take that as a 'no' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 06:04 AM Response to Reply #8 |
28. That would be exactly half as contemptible as voting Republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeGist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
12. In the astonishly remote likelihood that Clinton *doesn't* clinch the nomination... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
13. Define "support". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
15. I'm going out on a limb and am hoping you're being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 02:49 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Honestly, *I'm* more likely to get the nomination than he is! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
17. I may be writing in... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prince Paul (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
18. No fucking way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 09:53 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. Welcome to DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
19. Absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
21. It depends on who it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
22. Any of our candidats except for the republican one, Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 06:53 AM Response to Reply #22 |
30. and is that because you think the repub party nominee will pick better SCOTUS judges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Progressive Friend (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
23. Here is a better question: how many right-wing Democrats would vote for Kucinich? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
25. I am really getting sick of all these Kucinich "inevitability" threads. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:48 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Perhaps I should have included a :sarcasm: tag in my OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 12:27 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. my tag was missing too. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 06:32 AM Response to Original message |
29. Edwards yes, Hillary no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 12th 2024, 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC