|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 09:50 PM Original message |
Edwards calls for immediate withdrawal, slams Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. John Edwards, the anti-war candidate who voted for the war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 09:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Ahem. Who SPONSORED the resolution that started the war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 09:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Also Caused Others To Vote For The War |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:03 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. He keeps this up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ludwigb (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
15. Let's Not Beat Up On Him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. Way to go, Smilin' Johnny! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:17 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. John's desperate. I like him a lot, but he's attacking the guy with the right judgment and policy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:30 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. The Iowa voters he's talking to are going to catch wind of his vapidness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 08:22 AM Response to Reply #25 |
46. Well, they know him pretty well by now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tired_old_fireman (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:04 PM Response to Reply #18 |
35. Was that really an attack? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tired_old_fireman (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:54 PM Response to Reply #16 |
34. Give me a break. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 06:35 AM Response to Reply #34 |
41. It gets down to credibility and a record of leadership |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 06:35 AM Response to Reply #34 |
42. DUPE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prince Paul (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. But at least he's not funding it anymore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:33 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Catcallers on the sidelines don't get to do much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prince Paul (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:35 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. You mean the same way how Obama was a "catcaller" in 2002 ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:41 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Heh...btw, welcome to DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prince Paul (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. Thanks for the welcome but you're forgetting that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 08:41 AM Response to Reply #39 |
47. ...a nobody state legislator... ferchrissakes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greatauntoftriplets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 11:57 AM Response to Reply #39 |
56. Yes, Obama would have voted against the war in 2002 had he been in the Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-15-07 07:11 AM Response to Reply #29 |
71. Ok, now you've gone and done it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 11:44 AM Response to Reply #24 |
55. He can't, he's not in Congress anymore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antiimperialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 08:10 AM Response to Reply #1 |
45. So because Edwards voted for the war, Obama's slow withdrawal plan is better? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 08:54 AM Response to Reply #45 |
48. Edwards should let the adults make the policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antiimperialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 11:29 AM Response to Reply #48 |
53. My question again. Is Obama's plan better just because Edwards voted for the war? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 12:00 PM Response to Reply #53 |
58. I think Obama's plan is realistic and visionary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 07:08 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. Realistic, visionary, and consistent. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpeale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 07:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
63. & obama is the one who didn't but still votes to funnd it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-15-07 07:15 AM Response to Reply #1 |
72. I have to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrRobotsHolyOrders (681 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. Edwards Should Lead The Filibuster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ethelk2044 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
4. How and the Hell can he try to slam somebody when he PUSHED FOR THE DAMN WAR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 09:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. LOL! I gotta tell my black friends Edwards voted for the war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greatauntoftriplets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 11:58 AM Response to Reply #5 |
57. ...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ludwigb (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:05 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. That's probably taking it too far |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:06 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. He certainly did shill for the war nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ariesgem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-15-07 02:45 AM Response to Reply #12 |
69. Yes, he did shill for the war... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
6. Thanks John------those other Dem Candidates need to be pushed and you are doing that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
7. Dodd and Richardson also had some negative comments today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
9. Everybody shilling for Hillary now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
10. Dodd's statment criticizing Senators Clinton and Obama for stepping backwards on Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:05 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Yeah, the desperate second tier... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:26 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. Yep, they're just blowing in the direction of public opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. Dodd voted for the war...he should reflect on that a little before attacking Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:32 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. Dodd is a blowhard who knows he's going down, so he's trying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
17. Edwards who defended his war vote until 2005 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sundancekid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 11:08 AM Response to Reply #17 |
50. agreed ... he has become a caricature of himself ... nothin' but juvenile shots from the cheap seats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 07:30 PM Response to Reply #17 |
65. Obama made the point this week that Hillary did not oppose the war until 2007 w/o actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
20. Edwards being misleading as usual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ethelk2044 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:28 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #20 |
38. combat brigades=1500 to 4,200 soldiers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greatauntoftriplets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 12:01 PM Response to Reply #38 |
59. The logistics alone would be almost overwhelming. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sundancekid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 11:18 AM Response to Reply #20 |
52. the most infuriating part for me is that he STILL is in it for himself, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
22. Obama's got to go after him, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:33 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. I agree- Obama needs to smack John on this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:35 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Obama will take aim at all the Bush enablers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:41 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. True. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 10:42 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. I don't know about that, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueStater (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:05 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. What do you mean he doesn't matter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 06:02 AM Response to Reply #36 |
40. Myth-making? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueStater (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 07:36 PM Response to Reply #40 |
66. Take a look at this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 11:16 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. That doesn't put them neck and neck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tired_old_fireman (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 11:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
37. If Obama and Edwards get into it a bit it's a good thing in my book. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpeale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-15-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #30 |
73. better start with himself then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 07:04 AM Response to Original message |
43. "Immediate withdrawal of 40-50,000". Still good, but not what the title implies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 08:04 AM Response to Original message |
44. A 50,000 reduction would be a good start. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
49. next we'll have Kucinich going after Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 11:09 AM Response to Reply #49 |
51. It's the primaries!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 11:40 AM Response to Reply #49 |
54. It could even get to a mass spouse attack, ROFL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-13-07 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
60. Who is doing attack strategy for the Edwards campaign? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 07:09 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. Weird, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
64. Edwards is trying to wipe his bloody hands on others. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alteredstate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-15-07 12:09 AM Response to Original message |
68. Ugh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leaninglib (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-15-07 06:39 AM Response to Original message |
70. John, you are so predictable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-15-07 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
74. This wannabe becomes more of a joke everyday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 04:51 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC