Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Honest question regarding the Taser incident

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:47 PM
Original message
Honest question regarding the Taser incident
So let's say, for the sake of debate, that the kid who was tasered was a Republican, and had asked a question like "Why do weak lying democrats hate America?", or something similar. Let's assume that he had still cut in front of other students waiting to ask a question, he had still resisted arrest, etc. Is he still a victim of "police brutality"? Methinks too many DU posters see this as a question of "what he asked", rather than how he behaved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, he would still be a victim of police brutality and denied his First Amendment rights
to not only free speech, but free political speech.

I would think him deluded, but he's still allowed his opinion and to express it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. This isn't about free speech. Ever hear the phrase "You can't shout fire in a crowded theatre"?
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 12:51 PM by Lirwin2
There was a line, students were waiting patiently to ask Kerry questions. What about their right to free speech?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I may not have been privy to the entire event
but what I saw, the lad had no desire to exercise his first amendment rights, just to get on TV, kind of a political jackass moment.

Why can one not exercise their first amendment rights without making an ass of themselves in an obvious attempt at martyrdom? His 15 minutes are almost up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radiclib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Umm....let's see..
Yes.
I don't see too many light bulbs going on from this question :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. there was no reason whatsoever for any of the actions of the poilce in the videos I have seen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. I repeat: The is The United States of America. No one in this country should be tasered for asking
a question. I don't care what the question was. I don't care what a jerk the guy was. Regardless... no one in the United States should EVER be punished for asking a question.

It's not about Kerry. It's not about the kid. It's about us and our country. What we need to ask ourselves is this: Are we or are we not still a free country? How you answer the taser question pretty much sums up what kind of country you are willing to have the U.S. be.

I'm shocked there is even a discussion about this, frankly.

TC




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. He was tasered for resist arrest, not for asking a question
He was being arrested because he cut to the front of the line, and was disturbing the forum, just as you would probably be arrested if you shouted "FIRE!" in a crowded theatre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. 'He was being arrested because he cut to the front of the line....
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 01:57 PM by Bluebear
just as you would probably be arrested if you shouted "FIRE!" in a crowded theatre.'


One is a clear and dangerous public safety hazard. You want people to be arrested for rudeness? We need a LOT more cops! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. It's about Florida's tasering policy
and it's just too damn bad so many DUers let their Kerry shift the focus from where it should have been from the beginning. Florida is just tasering too damn many people and it needs to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. And that is my answer to the two people who replied to my answer #1.
Well stated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. The question everyone should have in their minds when regarding incidents like this is...
"If the cops DIDN'T have a taser at the time, would they have been justified to use a gun to shoot and kill the person in question?"

If the answer to that question is no, then the use of the taser is excessive force, if the answer is yes then it isn't excessive force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. The bottom line is tasering an unarmed man who cut a
line during an event on a university campus does not justify the use of a taser -- especially when there were at least half dozen officers on top of him once they took him to the ground.

Those officers should have utilized arrest control hold techniques instead of escalating methods of force.

And I would feel the same way had it been a Republican student.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. How would the cops know he was unarmed?
In a situation like that, they don't have the luxury of assuming he is unarmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. They might not have known for sure whether he was armed,
but there were plenty enough officers on top of him to control his arms and apply a twist lock, inducing a pain response, and most likely compliance.

Officer are taught how to deal with combative suspects, without always having to rely on the baton, taser or OC pepper spray.

And if there are any officers who should be prepared to deal with noisy, uncooperative activists, protesters, etc., it is university police officers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. I'll go one further
...even if he was a freeper....or the loathsome JimRob himself!

To me, human rights like freedom from electrical torture devices used in the name of compliance knows no party boundaries. I am just not that partisan, and neither should anyone else be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Silly, none of us knew what his motive was at first. We just saw
a video of an agitated questioner and heard him push his questions and get pulled out and tasered.

It looked like a situation that went out of control fast. Even if he is a RW plant, he should have been asked to take his time and ask his questions and even asked to let his answers to be given one on one if time was the problem.

It was Karry's responsibility to satisfy this situation. He should have found out then why the cops were after him. Attention should be paid to frantically curios students. Left or right, I think the questions were legit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. Why do dick sucking Democrats hate America?
That would have been the equivalent, to start. And would have been considered disruptive.

I think cops are relying on tasers too much, particularly in Florida. That ought to be the issue here, not free speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'll do you one better!
Let's say the guy was a DU-like Democrat (one of us) grilling a Bushbot Republican - the rest, same scenario. Now, how many here would be talking about how horrible it was for him to resist arrest? How many would be defending the tasering? How many would deny that it was STRICTLY about the questioning? I would venture damn near 100% of us would be outraged - at the cops AND at the speaker for just standing there. We wouldn't be cutting the Republican slack for "not being able to see very well," and all of the other excuses. And don't say, "None of us would be stupid enough to act like that guy...blah, blah, blah." Remember, just the same scenario.

Uh, huh. We all know the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. I believe for many it was "who was speaking" that determined
what position one took. Kerry supporters will find reasons to stick up for the cops because their guy was made to look bad. I personally don't blame Kerry though he doesn't impress me much anyway. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. Authoritarians can always find a good enough reason to use force
against a peasant. When in doubt, use excessive force. Police are most often present, today, to enforce authority, not to protect citizens. "Imperial America over all!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC