|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
bigdarryl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 06:34 AM Original message |
44% say they definitely will vote AGAINST Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 06:38 AM Response to Original message |
1. that is some serious "dislike" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 06:50 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Between the right wing and left wing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 06:59 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Give me a break! The ems need to nominate a winnable canidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 11:03 AM Response to Reply #6 |
47. Was "ems" just a typo? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-22-07 07:56 AM Response to Reply #47 |
117. Ah ha! Please tell me what is an "emo"? I've heard this term before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-22-07 08:29 AM Response to Reply #117 |
118. Here you go. "eom" means end of message...or the same as n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-22-07 10:30 AM Response to Reply #118 |
120. Thank you, but I was asking about Emo. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-22-07 01:48 PM Response to Reply #120 |
124. LOL! Sorry about that! But maybe some newbie was enlightened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norrin Radd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-23-07 05:15 AM Response to Reply #120 |
130. Here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-23-07 05:05 PM Response to Reply #130 |
133. Thanks, I don't know how I could have missed this Wiki entry. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norrin Radd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 03:17 AM Response to Reply #133 |
134. Sometimes, Wikipedia's search function misses it's own entries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PA Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 07:01 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Oh for Christ's sake, that's ridiculous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
66. Sheehan is running against Pelosi as an independent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 07:30 PM Response to Reply #66 |
101. No, they seek to save America |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:11 PM Response to Reply #101 |
104. Republicans and the right wing will tell you the same thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 09:03 PM Response to Reply #104 |
109. The pubs weren't always the monsters that they are today. You know how they got that way? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-22-07 07:29 AM Response to Reply #109 |
116. I agree. I would love to have Reagan or even Nixxon right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 07:48 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. WHat IS it with this "if you are not with us, you're the enemy" bullsh*t ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:25 PM Response to Reply #10 |
70. I guess we as Democrats need to start drawing a line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:27 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. Interesting.You say you see no difference between the Sheehan's and Delay's of the world. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. There is NOTHING wrong with "with us or against us" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:35 PM Response to Reply #75 |
79. Bush thinks that, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 07:06 PM Response to Reply #70 |
97. Do you believe in a party or in principles? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:13 PM Response to Reply #97 |
106. The Democratic Party IS the party of the Bill of Rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 09:05 PM Response to Reply #106 |
110. You haven't been watching the Dems in Congress, have you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 07:58 AM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Deleted message |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:27 PM Response to Reply #12 |
71. I looked real hard and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:58 AM Response to Reply #4 |
18. I'm not a fucking enemy for not supporting "Same Shit, Different Party", thank you very little. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 12:44 PM Response to Reply #18 |
56. No but you ARE enabling the TRUE enemy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 02:32 PM Response to Reply #56 |
83. It's really hard telling . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adenoid_Hynkel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 03:57 PM Response to Reply #56 |
88. she's innocent for selling us out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 07:07 PM Response to Reply #56 |
99. There's more than one true enemy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:28 PM Response to Reply #18 |
73. So you're saying you won't support the Democratic nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 02:26 PM Response to Reply #73 |
82. I'm not choosing anything. YOU are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:26 PM Response to Reply #82 |
107. Interesting that you use the word "our" in front of "nominee" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Popol Vuh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-23-07 03:41 AM Response to Reply #107 |
129. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superkia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:37 PM Response to Reply #18 |
80. Dennis Kucinich stands for our interests, vote Kucinich! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shimmergal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-23-07 02:07 AM Response to Reply #18 |
126. There's a fallacy here.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:19 AM Response to Reply #4 |
35. Pardon my bluntness, but that's plumb insane. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #35 |
62. no, it's post #18 that's plumb insane |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:07 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. I know what it's referring to... but it's still insane. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #62 |
84. REALLY? Then why don't you address my insanity with me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #84 |
86. Deleted sub-thread |
Progressive Friend (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 06:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
92. Right-wing Dems are plotting to run a Third Party candidate in 2008 too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mark414 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
113. if you're not with us you're against us? didn't bush say that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MetalCanuck (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:21 AM Response to Reply #1 |
14. I think it has to do with.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 09:15 AM Response to Reply #1 |
20. Allow me to explain: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tigereye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #20 |
51. isn't some of this explained by her being the Senator from New York? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 12:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
61. So true, Purity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #20 |
74. another load of manure from you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 03:45 PM Response to Reply #74 |
87. So, any criticism of her character is proof of misogyny? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 05:51 PM Response to Reply #87 |
90. Karl Rove and the rest of the Repug dirty tricksters have counted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:52 PM Response to Reply #90 |
114. So women deserve immunity and special favors that men don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-22-07 10:54 AM Response to Reply #114 |
123. Methinks you doth protest too much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 06:39 AM Response to Original message |
2. Massive gender gap there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:00 AM Response to Reply #2 |
29. Woah, *over half* of all men will turn out to vote *against* Hillary. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #29 |
36. Surely you don't find that surprising. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 12:18 PM Response to Reply #36 |
50. I find it surprising that anyone thinks she won't be an electorial disaster for Democrats. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 07:08 PM Response to Reply #36 |
100. Hillary won't support a woman's rights unless that woman runs an insurance company |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
screembloodymurder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 06:45 AM Response to Original message |
3. She may be the only Democrat that can lose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MetalCanuck (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:23 AM Response to Reply #3 |
15. Rove is still working for Bush ya know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 06:56 AM Response to Original message |
5. Rasmussen does the best anti-Hillary stuff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ethelk2044 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 07:26 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Her supporters here on DU has been pushing the Rasmussen polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #8 |
37. Heh... I've seen that too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:23 AM Response to Reply #5 |
16. Is It Wonder He's Fox's And Hannity's Favorite Pollster? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 12:29 PM Response to Reply #16 |
52. Take it up with Hillary supporters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:34 PM Response to Reply #5 |
77. What anti-hillary stuff? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alamom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 07:42 AM Response to Original message |
9. This week: 81% - 17% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:07 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Can you smell the desperation also? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 09:36 AM Response to Reply #9 |
23. But... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 09:47 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Who has ever said she has the nomination sewn up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:00 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Well sure as heck not me! LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:22 AM Response to Reply #25 |
38. Are you really asking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:42 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. Yes I am asking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 11:00 AM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Here's a few... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 12:30 PM Response to Reply #45 |
53. They make it so damn easy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:05 AM Response to Reply #9 |
30. She has to win the GENERAL election to become President. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 12:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
58. Nobody's disputing she can win the primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
11. It *is* possible to win an election with 56% of the vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:10 AM Response to Reply #11 |
32. Well, we know it's possible to lose the election even with the majority of votes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:12 AM Response to Reply #11 |
33. In fact... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:18 AM Response to Reply #11 |
34. That's not 56% who would vote for her, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:18 PM Response to Reply #34 |
69. She does have the highest def vote for number at 32% (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:54 AM Response to Original message |
17. I'm sure more voted against GWB in the last election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 09:02 AM Response to Original message |
19. Is anyone else skeptical of the validity of that poll question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Czolgosz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
21. That means she would have to win over 75% of the undecided vote; Obama would have to win over 67.5% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:23 AM Response to Reply #21 |
39. I think what she'd do is just throw the 50-state strategy out the window |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 02:42 PM Response to Reply #39 |
85. 50-state strategy = long term health of our party, not one election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
22. Only Gore can save us from the Clinton lobbyists now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 09:48 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. His endorsement of Hilary is right around the corner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:09 AM Response to Reply #26 |
31. You really think so? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fenriswolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:59 AM Response to Reply #31 |
44. after reading assault on reason i think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:17 PM Response to Reply #44 |
68. Dirty ol' stinkin' corporations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:25 AM Response to Reply #26 |
40. Ooooohooohoooo I'd love to see that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 11:02 AM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Can you imagine? It would certainly go down in DU infamy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:11 PM Response to Reply #46 |
65. Not to forget the great Laura Branigan explosion! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #65 |
76. Oooo...now you did it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
24. Count me in the 44%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
27. Count me in as part of that 44% - I've reached full Clinton burn-out. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
41. Deleted message |
Hawkowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
43. Close enough to steal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
48. This will certainly change after Hillary wins the Democratic Primaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
49. Good, it only takes 51% to win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #49 |
60. Ask Al Gore, and he will tell you all about what is required to win.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:04 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. Love your response and your sig line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
54. Is Rass good or bad this week? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 12:42 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Rasmussen is fine. Its how the OP has interpreted Ras |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 12:46 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. Now see, I can appreciate that response, and it's the type I was looking for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 12:55 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. Rasmussen has done well on election numbers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
67. Count me in that 44% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 06:09 PM Response to Reply #67 |
91. So you going to vote for Rudy or Mittens instead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 07:01 PM Response to Reply #91 |
95. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:12 PM Response to Reply #95 |
105. Well, OK. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-22-07 02:44 AM Response to Reply #105 |
115. Why, thank you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-22-07 10:50 AM Response to Reply #115 |
122. I just wanted to make sure you weren't going to play |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terri S (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
78. I don't put any stock in polls..whoever is doing them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lojasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
81. Do. Not. Want. ABC, please. EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
89. Here's the funny thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 07:54 PM Response to Reply #89 |
102. I can say convenient |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shimmergal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-23-07 02:19 AM Response to Reply #89 |
127. That 44% "would never" figure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
93. count me as on of the 44%!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
94. This is the RW company that claims barely anyone paid attention to the Live Earth event in July. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 07:07 PM Response to Reply #94 |
98. That's not exactly inaccurate actually... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
96. At 32%, her "definitely vote for numbers" are also the highest. Very impressive indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
103. "Vote against" polls don't mean much at this point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
108. I wonder how much longer before Skinner reimplements "Time Outs" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
111. I just saw that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
112. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-22-07 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
119. Deleted sub-thread |
wisteria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-22-07 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
121. Does this poll number just include democrats? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mz Pip (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-22-07 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
125. 48% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dugggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-23-07 03:05 AM Response to Original message |
128. So it will be a 56 to 44 landslide for Hillary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fightindonkey (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-23-07 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
131. Yes, and When She's the Nom and They See The Repug, They Will Vote For Her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jcrew2001 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-23-07 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
132. Nothing like losing the election before it starts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC