Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In Speech, Obama Repeatedly Attacks Beltway Media Establishment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 02:44 PM
Original message
In Speech, Obama Repeatedly Attacks Beltway Media Establishment
In Speech, Obama Repeatedly Attacks Beltway Media Establishment
October 2, 2007 -- 1:25 PM EST // //

A lot of people are talking about the big speech Barack Obama gave today calling for multilateral nuclear disarmament. But I wanted to focus in on what I think is a significant aspect of the speech that has little to do with the actual policy questions addressed here. Specifically, I'm talking about Obama's repeated attacks on the Beltway media establishment.

Obama came back to this theme again and again today. Here, for instance, Obama makes a clear reference to the D.C. punditry, pointing out its astonishing addiction to Republican narratives and frames in the aftermath of September 11 and in the run-up to the Iraq invasion:

"We were counseled by some of the most experienced voices in Washington that the only way for Democrats to look tough was to talk, act and vote like a Republican."

Here Obama targets the manifold failings of the media in the runup to the war -- specifically, the now-well-documented credulousness in the face of administration claims about Iraq WMD:

"Because the American people weren’t just failed by a President -- they were failed by much of Washington. By a media that too often reported spin instead of facts. By a foreign policy elite that largely boarded the bandwagon for war."

Here's Obama fast-forwarding and attacking D.C. pundits for their endless fascination with the MoveOn-bashes-Petraeus story:

"The fact that violence today is only as horrific as in 2006 is held up as progress. Washington politicians and pundits trip over each other to debate a newspaper advertisement while our troops fight and die in Iraq."

What's striking about these lines is how tightly they're in sync with the liberal blogospheric critique of the Beltway media. All these points hit on by Obama here -- the frequent pundit assertion that Dems will look weak if they don't walk in lockstep behind the GOP; the uncritical acceptance of administration spin; the punditry and media's willingness to parrot the GOP line on stories such as the MoveOn ad flap -- are central pillars in that media critique.

more...

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/2007/10/in_speech_obama.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Big O is on fire today
:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama's full speech can be found here
Edited on Tue Oct-02-07 02:51 PM by killbotfactory
"The hard truth is that the war in Iraq is not about a catalog of many mistakes – it is about one big mistake. The war in Iraq should never have been fought."

http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/10/_obamas_full_antinukes_speech_blasts_beltway_establishment.php#more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is the quote:
"Because the American people weren’t just failed by a President -- they were failed by much of Washington. By a media that too often reported spin instead of facts. By a foreign policy elite that largely boarded the bandwagon for war."

The elites who "advised" the Democratic party are 99% establishment mules who were on Bush's side.
The punditry, the mediawhores, the stenographers, the consultants, they are establishment tools and are not to be trusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sounds like he is running for President of the Netroots...
Edited on Tue Oct-02-07 02:51 PM by SaveElmer
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. You're right
Edited on Tue Oct-02-07 02:55 PM by killbotfactory
But it doesn’t end there. Because the American people weren’t just failed by a President – they were failed by much of Washington. By a media that too often reported spin instead of facts. By a foreign policy elite that largely boarded the bandwagon for war. And most of all by the majority of a Congress – a coequal branch of government – that voted to give the President the open-ended authority to wage war that he uses to this day. Let’s be clear: without that vote, there would be no war.

Some seek to rewrite history. They argue that they weren’t really voting for war, they were voting for inspectors, or for diplomacy. But the Congress, the Administration, the media, and the American people all understood what we were debating in the fall of 2002. This was a vote about whether or not to go to war. That’s the truth as we all understood it then, and as we need to understand it now. And we need to ask those who voted for the war: how can you give the President a blank check and then act surprised when he cashes it?


Clearly this kind of talk only appeals to netroots people. He needs to shake it up a bit and start dealing with important issues like raunchy video games.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. They all are to some degree, and there's nothing wrong with that:
Meanwhile, Hillary hired press critic Peter Daou as her internet outreach chief. The Hillary campaign took great care to play up Bill Clinton's on-air attack on Fox's Chris Wallace as a way to get cred with bloggers and Dem activists. Both Hillary and Chris Dodd competed to most aggressively attack Bill O'Reilly when he went after YearlyKos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Great article. I hope he keeps this up!
I wish he'd come out and say that she didn't even read the intel. before voting for the IWR! He needs to do more than just keep saying he was against it from the beginning, since she keeps coming back with her line that she voted to give Bush the ability to use more diplomacy, and if she knew then what she knows now she wouldn't have voted that way. He should go strong against her, saying that even after how many years "experience" she had in 2003, she didn't know to read the intel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oh yeah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. Regardless of what we think the political motivation may be behind this
speech, he makes a lot of valid, excellent points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. "these lines is tightly in sync with the liberal blogospheric critique"
(quote truncated to fit subject line, full quote below)

"What's striking about these lines is how tightly they're in sync with the liberal blogospheric critique of the Beltway media."
Interesting place to go for policy ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC