Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama speaks on private equity firms

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 09:48 AM
Original message
Obama speaks on private equity firms
The Washington Post today reported that the United States Senate will not address the taxation of private equity firms after millions of dollars in industry lobbying.

Here's how Senator Obama responded:

If there was ever a doubt that Washington lobbyists don't actually represent real Americans, it's the fact that they stopped leaders of both parties from requiring elite investment firms to pay their fair share of taxes, even as middle-class families struggle to pay theirs. When I'm President, the American people won't have to spend record amounts on lobbying to get their voice heard in Washington. I will close tax loopholes for big corporations, provide 90% of working Americans with a tax cut, and pass the strongest lobbying reform in history.



Gobama!
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/group/ObamaHQ/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. More welfare for the uber rich.
Tax breaks and government assistance to elite wealthy carpet baggers. Just how Friedman planned it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is very good
I hope the entire bundling system is next. Talk about loopholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I hope so too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. So, the inference is the other candidates took money, and he didn't?
Any one care to back that up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kudos to Obama and shame on the DLC Dems!
This kind of Democratic cave will only give Nader ammo to say there's no difference between the parties when it comes to the moneyed special interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Viva Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. More on Harry Reid's gift to private equity managers...
Reid's assurance all but ends the year's highest-profile battle over a major tax increase. Democratic lawmakers, including some presidential candidates, had been pushing to more than double the tax rate on the massive earnings of private-equity managers, who the Democrats say have been chronically undertaxed.

<>The move to tax private-equity earnings began last spring after some of those companies, also known as buyout firms, started to sell themselves to the public. Their initial public offerings forced the firms to disclose how much their managers earn, and the amounts reached into the hundreds of millions of dollars.

Several prominent lawmakers expressed surprise to find that the managers' profits, known as carried interest, were taxed as capital gains, for which the rate is usually 15 percent. That is less than half the 35 percent top rate paid on regular income.

A leading legislative proposal, which originated in the House, would tax carried interest as regular income. By one back-of-the-envelope calculation, the change could raise an extra $6 billion a year in personal income taxes.

That proposal was authored by Rep. Sander M. Levin (D-Mich.) and sponsored by Rep. Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. Rangel has said he wants to pass "the mother of all reforms" and that the carried-interest provision might be included. So far, though, the tax-writing panel has not scheduled a drafting session for the measure. And with little hope for Senate concurrence, a House-passed measure on the subject would have only symbolic value.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/08/AR2007100801704.html?hpid=topnews


Senator Chuck Schumer had earlier indicated he did not support this legislation, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC