|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
SHRED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 11:42 PM Original message |
BREAKING: Obama Says He Will Vote for NAFTA Expansion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-09-07 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. the top "democrats" are repukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:09 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 03:29 AM Response to Reply #9 |
29. I'm just going by their votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:00 AM Response to Reply #9 |
34. And you, of course, have citations to support your fecal claims? (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 09:58 AM Response to Reply #34 |
56. Oh man I must be really tired... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:57 AM Response to Reply #1 |
44. no, you're just viewing them from a psyuedo-socialist perspective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 09:28 AM Response to Reply #44 |
53. Why do so many hardcore Clinton supporters sound like reactionaries? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 09:29 AM Response to Reply #53 |
54. I dunno.... because most of them are? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 10:32 AM Response to Reply #53 |
57. Because this is what they're trying to sell us... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:01 AM Response to Reply #57 |
61. In a nutshell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 09:31 AM Response to Reply #1 |
55. I agree with you.... a paler shade of Republican, but Republican, nonetheless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
2. Oh boy...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fedupfisherman (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
3. This is going to hurt Obama n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SHRED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:04 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Well...he just lost me and I am spreading this info far and wide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:28 AM Response to Reply #5 |
18. make sure you "spread" the correct information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
4. Any word on how Clinton plans to vote on this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:05 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Never lose the opportunity to trash Edwards do you? Sheesh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:06 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Just...anticipating. It's like one of those formulaic movies you know exactly what will happen next |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 02:48 AM Response to Reply #6 |
27. One trick pony...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:22 AM Response to Reply #6 |
64. It's not trashing when it's true, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:07 AM Response to Original message |
8. He answered a question specifically about Peru AND did not say how he would vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:10 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Maybe it's like a "trial balloon." nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:14 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. maybe it's an extrapolation of a brief answer he gave |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
12. This is NOT "CAFTA" nor will it be fought by the AFL-CIO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SHRED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:22 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. The Teamsters are fighting it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:24 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Yes, they are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SHRED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:26 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. From the article...strike two |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:28 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Actually.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:15 AM Response to Original message |
13. At one point he HAD my vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QueenOfCalifornia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:40 AM Response to Original message |
19. Not just NO!!!!! Fuck NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
20. Again, Obama did NOT say he would vote for NAFTA expansion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:55 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. It's all faux outrage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 01:01 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. it's got to be; there is no other explanation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 01:03 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. I think so, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 01:14 AM Response to Original message |
24. More links |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faux pas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 01:43 AM Response to Original message |
25. Another one blatantly crosses over to the dark side. Pity. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Semper_FiFi (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 02:28 AM Response to Original message |
26. Not surprised. Kick and recommend. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 02:49 AM Response to Original message |
28. if he didn't say this, then that shouldn't be the effing title... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 04:02 AM Response to Original message |
30. Good For Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 06:46 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Same here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SHRED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 06:52 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. My goodness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:06 AM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Or read "Screwed" by Mr. Hartmann. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SHRED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:12 AM Response to Reply #37 |
40. It is truly unbelievable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:45 AM Response to Reply #40 |
41. I Guess Paul Krugman Is Screwed Up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SHRED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:48 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. with that statement...he is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:58 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. I Think These Gentlemen Were Smarter Than Krug |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clanfear (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:59 PM Response to Reply #41 |
81. Krugman has good points from time to time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 09:32 PM Response to Reply #81 |
82. Paul Krugman is a professor of economics at Princeton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 08:10 AM Response to Reply #33 |
47. Protectionism Didn't Work And It Was A Rethuglican Idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #33 |
66. Yea, Smoot Hawley worked wonders for the United States and Germany |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:16 PM Response to Reply #66 |
69. The Republican Party Was The Party Of Tariffs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:02 AM Response to Reply #30 |
35. Two Hillary supporters for Free Trade. Gee, color ME shocked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SHRED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:06 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. +10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:08 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Free of charge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:46 AM Response to Reply #35 |
42. We're For Obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 08:02 AM Response to Reply #35 |
46. I'm For Paul Krugman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 08:22 AM Response to Reply #46 |
48. But that's just the thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 08:37 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. I Said That In My First Post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:46 AM Response to Reply #46 |
68. Agreed, now if we could only do something about agriculture subsidies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 10:54 AM Response to Reply #35 |
60. !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaulaFarrell (840 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #30 |
73. 'free trade' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 06:18 PM Response to Reply #30 |
78. So how's Free Trade working out for Mexico? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clanfear (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #30 |
80. So very true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connie_Corleone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 06:50 AM Response to Original message |
32. David Sirota. Why am I not surprised. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:11 AM Response to Original message |
39. An Edwards's supporter attacks Obama - Color me surprise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ethelk2044 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
50. Obama on Nafta |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 08:50 AM Response to Original message |
51. Good for Barack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
52. Obama just lost Iowa and more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
58. Except he didn't say that at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
59. Truth Alert: Peru FTA is not NAFTA or CAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:23 PM Response to Reply #59 |
70. I like your sig line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 06:05 PM Response to Reply #59 |
75. I thought the Panama trade agreement did this too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
62. I don't understand the fuss. Obama will probably just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
63. They are all bastards except Gravel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
65. Corporate Dems have no shame. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
67. The good news here of course... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 05:59 PM Response to Reply #67 |
74. That's what he says. Let's hope they let him in the loop this time if the voting schedule "changes" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
71. don't the Peruvians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 12:49 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. Wouldn't it be nice if WE had a choice in the matter, too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
76. false report. He will reopen it and try to fix it first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
77. Sirota is a dishonest hack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
79. So Obama the 40 Million Dislocations that serious Economists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-10-07 09:37 PM Response to Reply #79 |
83. Opening trade with a county with a population of 29 million will cause us to lose 40 million jobs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 14th 2024, 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC