Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi calls anti-war protesting "a waste of time". (Edited for accuracy)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:02 AM
Original message
Pelosi calls anti-war protesting "a waste of time". (Edited for accuracy)
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 11:49 AM by seriousstan
"Look," she said, the chicken breast on her plate untouched. "I had, for five months, people sitting outside my home, going into my garden in San Francisco, angering neighbors, hanging their clothes from trees, building all kinds of things -- Buddhas? I don't know what they were -- couches, sofas, chairs, permanent living facilities on my front sidewalk."

Unsmilingly, she continued: "If they were poor and they were sleeping on my sidewalk, they would be arrested for loitering, but because they have 'Impeach Bush' across their chest, it's the First Amendment."

Though opposed to the war herself, Pelosi has for months been a target of an antiwar movement that believes she hasn't done enough. Cindy Sheehan has announced a symbolic challenge to Pelosi in California's 8th Congressional District. And the speaker is seething.

"We have to make responsible decisions in the Congress that are not driven by the dissatisfaction of anybody who wants the war to end tomorrow," Pelosi told the gathering at the Sofitel, arranged by the Christian Science Monitor. Though crediting activists for their "passion," Pelosi called it "a waste of time" for them to target Democrats. "They are advocates," she said. "We are leaders."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/09/AR2007100902006.html

God, you go to lunch and all hell breaks loose. I guess she also didn't imply that the Code Pink protesters in front of her house should be arrested?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. SHAME.
You don't get a free pass because you have a (D) attached.

Opposition is opposition, not giving the worst president in history carte blanche to do whatever the hell he wants, lest you want to be called "soft on terrorism".

Protest is a human and Constitutional RIGHT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaldemocrat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
111. I agree the protest rallies and sit ins appear a waste of time
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 02:36 PM by liberaldemocrat7
when hundreds of thousands of antiwar Democrats should call GOP and war contractor General Electric at 203 373 2211 and tell the person in public relations that we will not buy any GE products until Jeffrey Immelt, the CEO of GE can convince Bush to end the war and then resign with Cheney.

You have to hit the friends of the GOP in their wallet.

Everything else appears a waste in my view.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #111
112. And that solution wouldn't be a waste of time . . .. . . . why?
GE would listen to that less than Congress would listen to us. The money machine wouldn't stop flowing because of phone calls. Such an action would represent an insignificant belch in GE's overall revenue.

Protesting is NEVER a waste of time no matter HOW one does it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MaggieSwanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
46. Yup. I'm with you there.
and welcome to the Underground, you'll fit in with some of us rather nicely.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why aren't they targeting REPUBLICANS? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. Because Republicans don't control the House, or the agenda?
All things being equal, anti-war protesters think that Pelosi is a waste of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #25
78. If we got a handful of GOPers to vote with us, the war would be ended. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #78
84. Only if certain "leaders" made even a vague effort to stop it.
Which I'm not seeing.

The majority of the public wants to see it ended and our leadership should be HAMMERING on that fact, trying to drag the republicans over to a reasoned response to majority opinion - NOT castigating anti-war protesters who embarass them for their lack of action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #84
108. EXACTLY... what's the EXCUSE for not even TRYING?
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #78
123. If Pelosi didn't schedule the funding bill for a vote ... the war would end.
No Republican votes required.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
126. They do target Republicans. Where have you been? Or is your question,
"Why don't they target Repos EXCLUSIVELY?"

I can answer what I assume is your actual question, since anyone who ever checked out Code Pink's web site would see the many pictures of actions at Repos offices.

The reason they don't target Repos exclusively is because they are trying to end a war started and supported by both Repos and Dems.

Now I have a question for you;

Why did Hillary, a Dem, target John Kerry, a Dem, with Repo talking points?

Is she a secret Code Pinker?

Thanks for your answer in advance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nice. I'm so sick of Limosine Liberals I could puke.
Talk about wastes of time...

That said she didn't call anti-war activists a waste of time but their targetting of Dems a waste of time. I guess their time not hers.

That said if the Dems don't do anything much better that the Repukes then target them all I say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
28. Really ! We need a crew of Nash Rambler Liberals who're all greased and ready to KICK ASS !
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 11:36 AM by EVDebs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #28
68. DUzy! DUzy! DUzy!
best. post. ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #68
71. Let's ALL pile into that ol' Rambler, kids, and take it for a spin ! Thanks btw.
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 11:46 AM by EVDebs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. WHAT is wrong here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oh boy
Nancy, I don't consider myself one of those so called fringe groups, but these comments disturb me greatly. Again, we won the majority mostly because of the dissatisfaction of the Iraq War. And here you are, burning your bridges. Not smart, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
125. very well put. succinct, clear, direct.

perfect for emails, ltte's, letters .

mind if i crib?


.......................


you know, we can take heart in the fact that the protests aren't going un-noticed.
a pointless waste of time? eh. maybe not so much.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. she actually claims to be a "leader"
better take another look at those polls, Nancy. Those include D's as well, you know.

You are not perceived as a "leader" - that is what those polls are showing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
36. It's called HUBRIS, and she contracted it from direct contact w/* eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #36
98. But really, she said 'targeting Dems' is a waste of time
but unless the Dems do more to end the war and right this ship of state, we're ALL (GOP and Dems) in for a rough ride the next 18 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. I don't think 'protestERs' is what she said or meant.
I think 'protests' is.

And, to be frank, I've been to nearly all the anti-war protests in DC and I've decided they're a waste of time too. A different strategy is needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. I have been to DC as well and nothing comes of them
because people like Pelosi don't think that they have to listen to the American people. Listen to her for gods sake, she thinks it would be fine to arrest a homeless person who may happen to blemish her beautiful neighborhood. That comment alone is pretty outrageous. The fact that she doesn't feel obligated to listen to any of us is even more disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'm begining to really dislike this woman and wish like hell that we had ...
someone in the position of Speaker that would do the bidding of the people. Once again, these leaders have somehow forgotten what the November 2006 election results were all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. "only the antiwar advocates had the power to wipe the smile off Pelosi's face"
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 11:11 AM by nashville_brook
as in -- they are having the intended effect. she needs to *get serious* about something other than polls and political strategy.

she's not "leading." she's being a politician. she's way off base calling herself a "leader" in contrast to the people who are actually LEADING the antiwar movement. shame on her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. "If they were poor
and they were sleeping on my sidewalk, they would be arrested for loitering."

Is she saying police SHOULD arrest homeless people for loitering? Or just in her neighborhood? Where does she expect them to go?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. she's saying she wishes she could arrest the protesters -- nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. Oh, I understood that.
The unspoken message is that she wishes they were just poor people so she could get them arrested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:19 AM
Original message
yah -- just rubbing the lipstick off the oinker
there's also a subtle message about protesters being "no better" than the homeless -- like she's intimating an aimlessness -- like antiwar protesters have nothing better to do than "go camping."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
96. That's how I read it, too
To say that I'm disappointed in Nancy would be an understatement. I held such hope for her; now she just pisses me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #96
114. I don't care if I'm flamed, I have about had it with her

I am in total shock that she would come out and say such things.

Nothing seems to work with her and I am so disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:42 PM
Original message
Yes she is! And fuck her!
She's not even a decent American, let alone Democrat.

Fire her worthless, betraying ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
30. I thought "WTF" when I read that too.
She comes across as a rich elitist snob. That is not the person I want representing our party. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
60. Sums her up. Again.
I guess we know her position on the problem of the homeless. "Out of sight, out of mind." Like the vast majority of Americans that she DOESN'T represent. We are all "out of sight, out of mind" where she is concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
88. she is just saying it would be seen as loitering. Nothing else!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monktonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
13. Is this real or something from the onion?
My favorite part...."If they were poor and they were sleeping on my sidewalk, they would be arrested for loitering, but because they have 'Impeach Bush' across their chest, it's the First Amendment."
If you didnt know it was speaker Pelosi saying this you'd think it was
Limpballs or O'lielly.

Sorry about that first amendment thing Madam speaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
127. What a wonderful idea! That's a REAL progressive!
She's saying that all we have to do to stop the harrassment of the homeless by the police is distribute T-shirts to them emprinted with political slogans!

I'm impressed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
15. Your title is anti-Dem spin and it's also BS
She called anti-war protestING a waste of time. Quite a big difference.

Of course, that won't matter to the anti-Dems who seem to be taking over around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. It's got nothing to do with being anti Dem as you call it... These people...
were elected on promises to change the current situation both in Iraq and at home... So far they have done not much of either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. And in addition to my previous post, to many of us here it would seem that...
both Pelosi and Reid have become Bush's little enablers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
35. I think you got it wrong too
She called anti-war protestING AGAINST DEMOCRATS a waste of time.

Not sure I agree but I agree with you that the OP is being dishonest, seems to be a trend around here lately on both sides of the liberal isle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
51. I'm a left-of-center Democrat and I happen to think what she
said made her sound like a rich, elitist snob.

Frankly, arresting anyone because they don't have a home OR because they're protesting sounds like a Republican solution rather than a Democratic one.

Sorry these folks mucked up the PUBLIC street on which she lives.

Geesch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #15
64. i didn't say they were monkeys
i said they reminded me of monkeys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
105. no. we are the dem base. the anti-dems are the blue dogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
113. You can support the Democratic Party or you can support democratic ideals
If the Democratic Party supported democratic ideals, then you could have it both ways.

If people keep telling the elected Dems that we're with them even as they betray us, then they will make every single decision with republicans in mind.

Thanks for nothing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ImpeechBush Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
116. Is everyone supposed to just shut up and support the party bosses?
That doesn't seem right to me. If the party is going to be a strong one it needs internal criticism to grow. And maybe some new leadership. How can anyone not be disappointed over what we have had in Congress this past year? The whole antiwar movement is getting tossed under the bus and we are supposed to shut up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
16. So lead already, and act responsibly! And listen to the majority
of Americans who want this to end!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
17. Speaking of a waste of time.....
How ya doing Nancy? Say hullo to Harry for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #17
32. Pelosi thinks they've got another 13 months to kill it seems.
In the meantime, what's going on in Iraq ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
18. yes, dear queen nancy
we subjects need to know our place and shut the fuck up. :sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greenwood Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Afraid she has lost her way....
Sometimes power goes go a person's head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. The woman is paying the price for being
an "Unpopular Politician". Hope she has learned something from this!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
74. Send this to Her Majesty, oh pleeeezee!
Nancy Pelosi needs to step down since she has chosen to betray the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
27. later in the article she tips her hand >>> she's tinkering with the truth
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 11:23 AM by nashville_brook
Even those approval ratings for Congress, in the teens and 20s, didn't evoke regrets. "I don't like the numbers for Congress," she admitted, but "I'm very pleased with the Democratic numbers." She then took an unusual detour into polling minutiae. "Today the Rasmussen numbers were the third time that we were double-digit ahead in the generic," she reported, "and the third month in a row we were in the high 40s."

Holders of high office typically avoid discussions like that because it makes them look, well, political. But Pelosi did not hesitate to plunge into the political, explaining that "it was so important for us to bring the president's numbers down two years ago on Social Security" because it discouraged Republican candidates from running for Congress.


huh? "discouraged Republican candidates" -- ? as if Dems were elected unopposed?

here's the thing, social security wasn't the reason the Dems won in 2006. it was the war. she gladly took bush's low poll numbers ON THE WAR BACK THEN, and now wants to say that he had 80% disapproval because of SOCIAL SECURITY? holy crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
29. Go Cindy!
If I lived in Marin County, I'd campaign for
and vote for Cindy!!!!

And I'll keep protesting my heart out because
it's the right thing to do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
33. This is one of those statements like Barbara Bush would make...
"Those people are used to it"...

"If those people didn't have a sign around their neck, they'd be no better than homless people, and we just don't let those types of people in this neighborhood"

Seriously... who can defend any of these pigs anymore... Rich off insider knowledge and b.s. politics... paid mouth pieces.. no better than pundits on faux noise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
34. "We are leaders."
Ok....when does that start?

We're waiting!:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
38. Considering her track record so far, it would be pretty easy to say that
PELOSI is a waste of time, too.

Do your job, Nancy.

Hint: It isn't what you've been doing so far. You were elected to:

1. END THE WAR.
2. PROVIDE OVERSIGHT.
3. INVESTIGATE THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION'S MANY QUESTIONABLE ACTIONS.


Just do your job. Or get out of the way and let someone else do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #38
45. Now this post I agree with... And put Impeachment back on the &^*( table...
These people are bound to uphold the Constitution and they are not doing it.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:21 AM
Original message
I was SO looking forward to much more from Rep. Pelosi than this....
She is such a disappointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
39. The title of your OP is inaccurate
She did NOT call protestors a "waste of time", she said it was a "waste of time" for DEMOCRATS to target DEMOCRATS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. Exactly!.......n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #39
53. I've sent an alert on this, asking for the entire thread to be deleted because of the lie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #53
56. I've just sent an alert aswell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #53
66. I sent 1 also.........
the 3rd party rallying issues!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stimbox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #66
87. DLC can't handle any dissent
Fuckin' fascists.

We don't like what you are saying about Nancy Pelosi, so we are going to alert it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #87
99. Funny
how well your pic fits DK's campaign. Just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stimbox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #99
101. Just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #101
102. LOL!
Yes. Great pic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #53
69. I hope you alerted on yourself as well.
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 11:43 AM by lwfern
"Do not say that you are hitting the alert link to report another member. You are permitted to tell someone that you are adding them to your ignore list, provided that you actually do so."

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #69
70. It was to delete the entire thread, not against a member. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #70
73. just pointing out that you're violating forum rules
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 11:48 AM by lwfern
It's fine to alert on a thread, I've done it myself, many times. Sometimes the threads are deleted, sometimes not.

The problem is posting in the thread to announce that you've alerted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #73
79. Looks like you are correct.
I've reread and totally accept what you say as true.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:48 AM
Original message
I am a Democrat
and I don't see targeting Democrats who are enabling Bush's policies a waste of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
80. You're once again confusing what you believe with what was actually said
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 11:59 AM by Lirwin2
Nancy did not even use the phrase "waste of time." In fact, she didn't even use the words "waste" or "time"! When your OP states that "Pelosi calls anti-war protesters a waste of time", when she clearly does not, then the title of your OP is inaccurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #80
95. It is not my op n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #95
115. My bad. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #39
128. They're not Democrats
they are enabling, quisling DINOs who deserve to be targeted as much, if not more than, repukes.

Repukes stick to their guns (literally) no matter what, no matter ethically, morally and even politicaly challenged.

But these bastard, lying Dems were elected to the majority for a mission. Fuck 'em if they can't take the heat for their backpedaling excusitis!

And BTW, I'm sick of the meme that there are not enough votes, that we must wait 'til Dems have the WH. Shit, we had it all after the 1993 elections and lost in 1994 because of internal fractious weakness that let repukes get away with undermining a Dem president and forcing him to the right.

Enough already. Screw Pelosi, Reid and all the DINOs.
Protesting is never a waste of time. PERIOD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
40. Pelosi, STOP being the handmaid of this bum!


Wake up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
42. My interpretation of what she said is...
that targeting Democrats is a waste of time (in her opinion, not mine).

It's misleading to state that she called the protesters "a waste of time".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
43. Misleading Subject. She said it was "a waste of time" for them to target Democrats.
There's a difference there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
44. "advocates" vs "leaders" (vs lobbyists) -- advocates are lobbyists w/o money
therefore we have no place in the political process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
47. Your subject title is a lie. You've parsed what she really said. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #47
58. Maybe the subject line was a lie, but the commentary on this site...
tells you just how dissatisfied we are with what is being done in "Our" party by people that are supposed to be leading us. Make no mistake, I am a true blue Liberal Democrat and this is not at all what I expected from my elected officials from the November 2006 election and I know that the American people feel the same way. Get these rat shits out of the White House ASAP is what I voted for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #58
61. The art of disinformation is mixing lies with truths. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #61
129. apples and oranges
Edited on Thu Oct-11-07 11:54 AM by Carolina
The disinformation is truly with our so-called leaders. The OP's slight distortion really amounts to very little because the bottom line: Pelosi is revealing her true self, disdainful of those who would dare come into her neighborhood and protest Dems, the war, whatever ...

For shame that the 'little people' are not those dirty 'thems' (the homeless) whom she could have arrested!
For shame that the 'little people' should exercise their Constitional right of assembly and protest

Screw her, not the poster!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
48. Trouble is Nancy, YOU'RE NOT LEADING.
Therefore it is, once again, up to us, we the people, to get you to move off of your ass and do the right thing. You have the power to defund this war, bring it to an end, and bring the troops home, yet you aren't exercising it. Instead you are willing to continue to play politics with the lives of innocent people. Have you no shame?

If you are tired of the protesters outside your front door, then end the war ASAP. Until then, get used to it. Thanks to your inaction, there are thousands in Iraq who don't have a home, or a meal. Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
49. Apparently people think Pelosi has a magic wand to stop the war today
Ferchrissakes, she has been trying to end the Occupation. Do some homework and learn something about veto-proof legislation. Then do some homework on how long it took to stop the Vietnam War.

Why the protestors are allowed to camp out in a neighborhood without being arrested for loitering is bullshit as well. I lived in SF for a while and some people are just "professional protestors" yearning for attention and offering nothing in return. I've seen them in action blocking traffic, jumping on top of cable cars and smashing windows of storefronts. I guess it beats acting like a hippie making peace signs out of pennies on Haight street. They have every right to protest, but should do it on public property or show up during the day and leave in the evening...

And the OP does the bidding of liars by saying that Pelosi thinks anti-war protestors are "a waste of time". She didn't say that! She said they should perhaps target the people who keep voting for more war and won't join her in legislation to put in a timeline and redeployment schedules.

I like Cindy Sheehan and her original mission and she knows she hasn't a chance in her race against Pelosi. She is being dragged in by the A.N.S.W.E.R. crowd. I hope she figures that out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #49
55. it took years to end the vietnam war (fuck you very much LBJ/Nixon) because so many
in congress were afraid to be blamed for America's defeat.
fortunately, the US was defeated anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #55
109. "losing/winning vietnam" meme has morphed into "support the troops"
which is a much weaker message. there's many ways to support the troops; one way, by bringing them home.

lately i've heard stories about military families wanting US policy to be "stay in Iraq" until we "win" -- and therefore, the "support the troops" meme means "if we bring them home, they'll feel like they were used/abused."

what i don't understand is -- since when do we bankrupt our country (in a land war in Asia) so our troops can have a warm fuzzy feeling about their mission? isn't this where someone says "suck it up, soldier?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #49
63. the way I see it is
people who wear signs of protest are allowed to loiter the neighbor hood and not be arrested.right?.......then maybe all the homeless people should camp out in front of their "city halls" and be guaranteed no arrest as long as they carry impeach signs........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #63
83. Some towns are not like SF
If you're homeless in many towns, putting an "Impeach Bush" sign is like saying "punch me".

As for SF and the City Hall, there are camps outside the building and just about everywhere you go. I've helped them out when I could in shelters when I was there.

If the SF cops arrested the protesters around Camp Pelosi, it would create even more havoc.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
50. Truer words were never spoken. Thanks Nancy!
If your last name doesn't end in Inc. or Corp. you're wasting your time and Nancy's.

She shouldn't have to waste her beautiful mind on war protesters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
52. code pink rocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
54. nice taken out of context quote there
Pelosi called it "a waste of time" for them to target Democrats

- Notice how this is not the whole sentence, its someones interpretation of what she said that has not been posted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #54
76. It's not taken out of context, it is a fabrication
If she said, "If you are looking for an enemies of the state, measures targeting the protesters are a waste of time" that would be taken out of context

Since she did not say "the protesters are a waste of time" in any context, the assretion that she said that is a lie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
57. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
59. I have no issue with teh Speaker's comments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
62. The OP headline is a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #62
67. Washington Post: Pelosi called it "a waste of time" for them to target Democrats
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 11:44 AM by EVDebs
"Pelosi called it "a waste of time" for them to target Democrats. "They are advocates," she said. "We are leaders."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/09/AR2007100902006.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #67
72. Correct. A far cry from "Pelosi calls anti-war protesters "a waste of time"."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #72
77. See post #28. Let's buy Nancy an old Rambler to ride if they call her a Limosine Liberal
In fact, the whole herd should be buying old beaters, for the DURATION, if that's what this 18 month Bataan Death March is until we can vote in a new congress and Prez.

The point of this post really is DO SOMETHING to end this war (and don't go starting more in Iran, either).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #62
124. Yes, indeed!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
65. A pathetic third party kook movement would be a waste of time. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stimbox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
75. Sorry Nancy, we are the leaders.
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 11:49 AM by stimbox
You work for us.
You seem to forget that fact.
We voted you in and we can vote you out.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
81. Your Headline is still misleading.
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 11:59 AM by onehandle
According to the article:
'Pelosi called it "a waste of time" for them to target Democrats.'

Your edited headline:
Pelosi calls anti-war protesting "a waste of time".

Your original headline:
Pelosi calls anti-war protesters "a waste of time".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
82. Your edited title is wrong. (n/t)
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 12:02 PM by Maribelle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #82
97. I am new here
but this is certainly an education. Facts must not be allowed to get in the way of a two minute hate. Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tex-wyo-dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
85. Misleading title aside, this still doesn't detract from the fact that...
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 12:07 PM by tex-wyo-dem
the Dems have been extremely unsuccessful in changing anything with regards to the Iraq "strategy," much less end the war. Every time a golden opportunity raises its head and the warmongers are put into positions of extreme weakness, the Dems fold up like a cheap tent and the status quo is preserved.

What exactly has changed since the '06 elections? Appears to me that the whole fucked up mess continues to be more maiming and dieing of our troops and Iraqi civilians, a treasury draining free-for-all for contractors, fanning of the flames U.S. hatred and the creation of a nightmarish humanitarian crisis. To top it all off, the Dems have been allowing the saber rattling against Iran to change from a low drum beat to an all out percussive chorus...the real kicker being the RW is using the exact same lying tactics to make their PNAC wet dream come to fruition and nobody seems to be the wiser.

Quite a pile of accomplishments by our "leaders," eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #85
130. Exactly
so many here are killing the messenger, but buried in Nancy's words, THE MESSAGE, lurks her real sentiment about protesters and protesting. She's just pissed that she's the target now -- and a deserving one, I might add. She just covers her manure and attitude by saying "protesting Democrats ..."

Truth is she is showing her true self, her disdain for all the little people.
Screw her and hail to the protesters one and hail!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WGS Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
86. Actually
I think she is correct. She only has so much power, she cannot pull funding by herself. People camping out in front of her house is not going to change anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #86
89. She has the power to put impeachment back on the table-----I think that is what
many of protesters outside want (not all).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #86
132. Wrong
People camping out in front of her house is rocking her cozy, elitist world and indirectly (as shown in this interview) exposing her true DINO colors for all the world, notably all of us who worked so hard to put her in the friggiin Speaker's seat last year!

Thanks for nothing, Pelosi.
Good for the protesters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
90. Smile, Though Your Head Is Aching By Dana Milbank


Smile, Though Your Head Is Aching

By Dana Milbank
Wednesday, October 10, 2007; Page A02
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #90
92. the smile seems more akin to that of a barracuda.......... Dana is rather like Maureen
Dowd at times.



........It was a rather fierce response to the party's liberal base, which frightens many a congressional Democrat. But it wasn't out of character for the new speaker. Pelosi's fixed and constant smile makes her appear as if she is cutting an ad for a whitening toothpaste. But when you listen to the words that come from her grinning maw, the smile seems more akin to that of a barracuda..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
91. she's afraid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
93. ...."What do you see as your greatest mistake?" asked one reporter.



......"What do you see as your greatest mistake?" asked one reporter.

Pelosi smiled. "Why don't you tell me?" she proposed. She smiled again, then laughed. " 'Cause I think we're doing just great." She laughed again.

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Even those approval ratings for Congress, in the teens and 20s, didn't evoke regrets. "I don't like the numbers for Congress," she admitted, but "I'm very pleased with the Democratic numbers." She then took an unusual detour into polling minutiae. "Today the Rasmussen numbers were the third time that we were double-digit ahead in the generic," she reported, "and the third month in a row we were in the high 40s."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
94. So it would be more productive to target Republicans?
Lindsay Graham: "Well, you know, I was just about to vote for the funding bill, then all these protestors showed up and they DO have a point. You know what? Next time the Democrats introduce a funding bill, I'm voting against it unless there's a binding timeline to end the occupation."

That would be more productive than addressing the leader of the party that's supposed to be against this war, and ask them to quit funding it with toothless, non-binding caveats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
100. My first reaction was ..
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 01:01 PM by zidzi
"Gawd Damn her!" and then I read it. Nancy's calling herself a "leader" but is she doing that?

Nancy's going to be defending her non-action for a very long long time..so get use to coming up with shit, Nancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
103. she's right
as long as she's in charge, there is no point in protesting. The war will keep on going, until November 2008, at the very least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #103
106. Agree totally
Millions in the streets in the run up didn't have any effect on our representatives. Has something changed that would make the strategy have any effect whatsoever?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaulaFarrell Donating Member (840 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #103
117. I'm afraid you're right
they think the Dems have all the anti-war people in the bag in 2008. they don't realise how many people will be so frustrated they don't bother to vote at all in 08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
104. Well, excu-u-u-uze your electorate
How inconsiderate of them to value soldiers' and civilians lives. How ungenerous of them to want their taxes to go toward health care, social security, medicare, infrastructure - well, you know their own country. Ingrates!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pooka Fey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
107. No, Nancy you're no leader. You're not even a decent public servant.
Lead, follow or get out of the way. San Francisco - please don't renew her contract.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
110. pelosini seems to know how to play the game ... the bush game, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #110
118. The Homeless should all carry Anti-War signs wherever they
go. Maybe that will stop the Police from arresting them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morereason Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
119. I don't expect Clinton supporters to get this
I see the Clinton supporters have come to defend Pelosi. If you don't see what is wrong with Hillary's positions and inconsistancy I doubt you will see the problem here with Pelosi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #119
120. Clinton and Pelosi somehow made it to where they are by doing something right.
"Nothing succeeds like success".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HooptieWagon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #120
121. Nothing succeeds
like being a puppet of corporations and the DLC... but that doesn't make one a leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #121
131. Where I come from, receiving the majority of votes makes one a leader. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #131
134. so you call all those bone heads in DC
leaders?!

Sometimes the cream doesn't rise to the top. The mold does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #119
133. touche
they are all in bed together. We, little people, true dems are so screwed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
122. ZERO surprise...
Civil disobedience is historically proven to bring about change from the bottom-up, so it's no surprise that many obedient Americans would agree, and that Pelosi would be foursquare against it. Just keep on believin' that your votes will make all the difference!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC