Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The 2006 Connecticut Senate race proves that there will always be splinterists no matter what.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 10:21 AM
Original message
The 2006 Connecticut Senate race proves that there will always be splinterists no matter what.
Edited on Mon Oct-15-07 10:22 AM by LoZoccolo
They threaten on forums like this one, saying that because they are not getting what they want, they will splinter.

But do they ever say what specific terms would get them not to splinter? I haven't seen it. I hear generalizations like "if they would adopt Nader's/Kucinich's platform" (which neither of them actually have to deliver on) "then I would vote for the Democrats".

My theory is that there is always a certain group of people who like to think themselves more righteous and intelligent than 97% of us, and will act not according to getting more of what they want, but according to what will make them feel that superiority.

My proof? A Green Party candidate, Ralph Ferrucci, ran for Senate against Lamont in 2006.

And my point? People who will never come through with the goods anyways will get ignored. But maybe that's the point; to enjoy the feeling of the superior genius outsider who no one understands. They have a reason to want to lose.

NOTE: If you are going to allege that I supported Lieberman in this race, please respect the other members of Democratic Underground and come prepared with some proof. No one has been able to establish it as yet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. I knew I was right.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hey, gnat gatcher. You missed the beam in your eye named Joe Lieberman...
Edited on Mon Oct-15-07 05:26 PM by arendt
This "splinterist" epithet you just made up to bash people -
why didn't it apply to "Independent" sore-loser ex-Democratic
candidate Joe Lieberman?

Why are you dredging up some asterix-percentaged nobody and
ignoringt Traitor Joe? Oh, maybe because the DLC still loves Joe.

This is a pathetic attempt, really. Give it up.

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Because I'm addressing a specific argument that doesn't apply to centrist splinterists.
Did you even read the fine print at the bottom? Go do a search of my posts from that election which mention "Lieberman" if you want to find out what I thought of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Oh hey wait, you can't do an advanced search, because you didn't donate to DU.
OK then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. what does someone's donation status have to do with anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It means they cannot do an advanced search.
Unless someone donated for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. yes, but why bring it up?
Not like I don't know, but I wonder if you'll come out and say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. I call them the ideological purists. They would rather let the country go to hell then...
compromise even just a little bit. They do not understand that compromise is necessary for democracy to function, otherwise the body politic would break up into a bunch of tiny millitant factions trying to impose their ideals on the world by force, the end result being one of the factions defeating all the other factions and imposing a totalitarian state. All of these ideological purists are totalitarians at heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. And Greens ran against Wellstone too. Hence the name...
G-etting
R-epublicans
E-lected
E-very
N-ovember
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC