Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So what will be Bush's next excuse for staying in Iraq?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 03:48 PM
Original message
So what will be Bush's next excuse for staying in Iraq?
Edited on Tue Oct-16-07 03:51 PM by Seabiscuit
The Iraqi parliament recently declared that reconciliation (between Sunnis and Shias) is "off the table" and will never be "on the table".

Reconcililation was Bush's last excuse for remaining in Iraq.

After the lies about the pretexts for invading Iraq were exposed (WMDs, ties to Al Queda, harboring Al Queda, Saddam preparing to nuke us, implications Saddam was behind 9-11), Bush has shifted his justification for the war and our continued presence in Iraq so many times that if you're head's not spinning, it must be empty.

Then it was to capture Saddam. Then it was to try Saddam. Then convict him. Then execute him. Done, done, done and done.

Then it was to give Iraqis an election. Done.

Then it was to give them time to draft a constitution. Done.

Then it was to quell the violence by allowing the "surge" time to work. His own military mouthpiece testified last month that it "worked". so: Done.

Then it was to give them time to reconcile their differences.

The violence will never end while we're there, and there will be no reconciliation while we're there.

So what will be Bush's next excuse?

Will he have to begin telling the truth about the PNAC agenda??? Oil, military bases from which to launch invasions of Iran, Syria, and ultimately Saudia Arabia and Egypt?

I doubt it.

So what will be his next spin??? Al Queda, Al Queda, Al Queda, 9-11, 9-11, 9-11? Sorry, but he's already worn that empty excuse out for years.

My guess: We need our troops in Iraq to defend us to help us fight Iran.

(sound of my head exploding).



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. There's still money in the meter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's the oil .... the only reason we are there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Of course, but what will Bush's next excuse be to hide that fact?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Fight over there, not over here?
Edited on Tue Oct-16-07 03:59 PM by tekisui
Easier to get to Iran?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. It's always blown my mind how many people fall for that "over there" crap.
And he's having a hell of a time selling his invade Iran before they nuke us crap. I think he'll need a lot more support for a "bomb Iran" campaign before he can use the excuse about keeping our troops in Iraq to help fight Iran.

Meanwhile Vladimir Putin is personally in Tehran, Iran today making Bush look like a one-upped fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Mercury is in retrograde.
No, wait.

That was Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. LOL!
Reagan's mercury was probably perpetually in retrograde.

While Bush's Uranus has probably always been in retrogate. That's why he's always talking out of his ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. I care more about why Hillary states it will be the end of her first term before
the troops begin to return home. First she stated; "make me president and I'll end the war" but it wasn't until two months later that she said, this would occur -> 4 years AFTER I'm elected president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Fine, but why don't you start your own thread? That's pretty off-topic here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC