Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fox News asks Ron Paul why he gets most military support while calling for Iraq withdrawal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:49 AM
Original message
Fox News asks Ron Paul why he gets most military support while calling for Iraq withdrawal
Edited on Thu Oct-18-07 10:50 AM by RamboLiberal
-----

Fox asked Paul about a study showing he is the candidate with the most support from members of the US military, even though he is calling for immediate withdrawal from Iraq. "We take the traditional position that you should only go to war under a declaration and win and get out," Paul explained. "It's protecting the troops ... and the fact that we get the money from the military more than all the other Republicans put together is a pretty darn good endorsement."

Paul finished by noting that his positions are based on Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, which he regularly cites as the basis for his view of limited government. That section enumerates a limited list of Congressional functions -- including punishing piracy on the high seas, granting letters of marque and reprisal, and regulating commerce with the Indian tribes -- but does not cover many of the functions routinely assumed by government today.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Ron_Paul_tells_Fox_We_are_1017.html

Yep, sure does boggle those Faux empty-heads that there are military members who are tired of the multiple Iraq tours and the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well - Let's see, withdrawal, troops, troops families?
Gee, I wonder why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good for him
He's stealing the voice of the other Repubs as "supporters of the troops"- something I wish the Dems would do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. They don't know?
:eyes:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SergeyDovlatov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yep and Obama is second most.
Notice that Obama is the least warmongering of the top democratic tier and he got most military donations (after Ron Paul)

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/politics/5223477.html

Paul leads in donations from military voters, with Obama next

WASHINGTON — Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul, the congressman from the Houston area who opposes the Iraq war, has gotten more contributions than any other White House contender from donors identified as affiliated with the military.

According to a Houston Chronicle analysis of campaign records from January through September, Paul received $63,440 in donations from current military employees and several retired military personnel.

Democrat Barack Obama, another war critic, was second in military giving. The Illinois senator got $53,968 during the nine months.

~~~

But.. but .. but they are not supporting the troops? Those traitors Obama and Ron Paul for calling for surrender, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hmmm...military and their families no longer wanting to be pawns in the neocons' insane ideology?
Gee....imagine that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hard to imagine NOT supporting a guy who doesn't insist you get your ass shot off for nothing.
How does this escape the sharp folks at Fox News?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Its a damn shame
the military gravitates to a nutbag though. There are better choices for a responsible withdrawal + a well run government too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. Real soldiers sign-up to protect and defend their country.
Real soldiers know that their country is safest when there is no need for soldiers to be put in harms way.

Only phony soldiers crave a fight or a war when none is necessary, or when it makes the country less safe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Sort of a reverse
Rush Limbaugh argument. Suggest you reconsider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. That's precisely why I formulated it the way I did.
If the Republicks think it's okay to call any soldiers phony, then let THEM be the ones to wear the label.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. If they don't know by now, then they will never know
or they are too cowardly to admit it. Fox News fears the truth. They want to fight the war on fear by spreading fear.

ter·ror·ism /ˈtɛrəˌrɪzəm/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes.
2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.
3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.

While that sounds like the official Republican party platform, it's actually the dictionary definition of terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. that sure is a lot of phony troops n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. Commie, Nazi and Bushie propagandists have no choice but to believe their own lies
or lose their jobs & healthcare, among other things.

Given that, of course they would scratch their heads as to why the people they have rolled over like Hitler rolled mentally over the German, would not behave as they were tolds.

Those Ron Paul donations represent, Quite literally, one of the few remaining freedoms Americans have remaining to influence or change government. The imperial Subjects of Amerika, where possible, are going to take advantage of our few remaining freedoms in this area to express what they cannot anywhere else, especially the voting booth (we have all seen the method by which the Bushes steal thousands of Black soldiers' votes).

I no longer include the "vote" because I do not believe our Stalinist voting system has any validity left to it as an accurate or even semiaccurate expression of the Will of the People.

Of course those Commie-style liar and propagandists would scratch their heads. The support for Paul comes from that place outside the Lying Bushie False Reality Bubble, which has successfully destroyed the old USA and has aims on the rest of the world.

But the rest of the world ain't buying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. hahaha
RACK YOUR BRAINS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. Obama got more military donations than Paul. EOM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC