Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT - Make Walls, Not War

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 12:46 PM
Original message
NYT - Make Walls, Not War
Peter Gabraith's OP in today's New York Times:

<IN a surge of realism, the Senate has voted 75-23 to acknowledge that Iraq has broken up and cannot be put back together. The measure, co-sponsored by Joe Biden, a Democratic presidential candidate, and Sam Brownback, Republican of Kansas, supports a plan for Iraq to become a loose confederation of three regions — a Kurdish area in the north, a Shiite region in the south and a Sunni enclave in the center — with the national government in Baghdad having few powers other than to manage the equitable distribution of oil revenues.

While the nonbinding measure provoked strong reactions in Iraq and from the Bush administration, it actually called for exactly what Iraq’s Constitution already provides — and what is irrevocably becoming the reality on the ground.>

snip

<Let’s face it: partition is a better outcome than a Sunni-Shiite civil war. There is, in any event, little alternative to partition. Iraq cannot be reconstructed as a unitary state, and the sooner we face up to this reality, the better.>

Peter W. Galbraith, a former United States ambassador to Croatia


More: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/23/opinion/23galbraith.html?_r=3&hp=&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Recommended for those who are unsure of Biden's plan for Iraq. I found this
helpful and I'm for it already! Just more info to help you reach your decision.

Great article, tsegat - thank you! :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It is a rather impressive endorsement of Biden's plan
though Galbraith did refer to it as a partition, which it isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree - it's difficult to stop people from referring to it that way. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Peter Galbraith's plan for Iraq is more extreme than Biden/Gelb
He is for a partition, where Biden/Gelb are hoping for a loose federation.

Similar - but not exact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC