Scientists frustrated over 'Edits' of Global Warming Report. Original 14 pages; WH version 6 pages

Scientists Denounce Global Warming Report 'Edits'
Public Health Experts Say Edits Represent Censoring of Science
By RAJA JAGADEESAN, M.D. and CARLA WILLIAMS
ABC News Medical Unit
Oct. 25, 2007
http://www.abcnews.go.com/Health/GlobalHealth/story?id=3775766&page=1

Environmental and public health experts overwhelmingly denounced editing by the White House of a federal health agency head's testimony to Congress Tuesday. Significant deletions were made from the testimony, concerning global warming and the potential impact on human health.

Story The original, unedited testimony presented to Congress by Dr. Julie Gerberding, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and obtained by ABC News was 14 pages long, but the White House Office of Management and Budget edited the final version down to a mere six pages.

Scientists and public health organizations called the move "frustrating," "terrible" and "appalling." The edits essentially deleted all sections that referred to climate change as a public health concern -- including the risks of increased food-borne and waterborne diseases, worsening extreme weather events, worsening air pollution and the effect of heat stress on humans.

"Dr. Gerberding is the lead of the premiere public health agency in the U.S.," said Kim Knowlton, a science fellow on global warming and health at the National Resources Defense Council in New York. "It's shocking that she was not allowed to say in a public discussion some of these vital details.

"One has to wonder why was this is so threatening to the White House."

In response to the controversy that followed, White House press secretary Dana Perino stated that the White House Office of Management and Budget redacted the majority of the information on the basis that the science in the testimony did not match the science reported by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

However, a review of the latest report on climate change issued by the IPCC -- the organization that shared the Nobel Peace Prize with former Vice President Al Gore two weeks ago for efforts to educate the public about climate change -- shows that it contains an entire chapter about the human health impacts.

and mask the true threats to our nation and the world at large, it's all so totally political for them, they don't give a damn about the people.

Thanks for the thread, dajoki.

No, I for one don't wonder at all. I know.

They want a lot of people to die, preferably the "useless eaters" and the poor and those without medical insurance and the chronically ill and the immunosuppressed and the congenitally defective and the homeless and, yes, THE POLITICAL OPPOSITION.

The only way their greed can be satisfied, since the pie can't be made any "higher", is to decrease the number of pieces it has to be sliced into.

it would be this bad, but I agree with you about their feelings toward "THE POLITICAL OPPOSITION".

and isn't afraid of it.

Because they are Always threatened by the TRUTH ...

Barbara Boxer should demand another hearing, this time with the facts on the table.

Democrats press Bush on climate change testimony
Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:07pm EDT
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN2533449520071025?sp=true

<<snip>>

according to documents released by Boxer, were: "Scientific evidence supports the view that the earth's climate is changing. ... In the United States, climate change is likely to have a significant impact on health."