Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So what exactly is Hillary trying to say?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:12 PM
Original message
So what exactly is Hillary trying to say?
Edited on Thu Nov-01-07 04:27 PM by Egnever
WELLESLEY, Mass. (Reuters) - Democrat Hillary Clinton urged women voters on Thursday to rally behind her campaign against "the boys club of presidential politics" two days after male rivals attacked her repeatedly at a debate




She cant play with the big boys cause she is a woman? Men just hate women? you shouldn't vote for them because they are men?

This is a horrible defense she is putting out here and will do her more harm than good IMHO. Theres just no way to spin "its the guys against me" that I see working for her in anything other than a small circle of supporters.

It just leaves the door open for too many questions.

More stumbling IMHO. I am sure it wont take her out or anything but I think she needs to back off the girls against the guys thing.

Although I must say I am quite happy she is doing it. I really think we have better candidates available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. What are you referring to?
Did I miss something specific?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. her campaign pushing the idea that she was getting jabbed at last night
Because she was a woman. Not because she is the front runner but because the "boys club" decided to turn on her.

I think it will turn what i think was a positive for her into a negative. By changing the focus from a strong candidate running for president that happens to also be a woman to one of a woman running for president that thinks men are against her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. Twice in 24 hours she played the victim .. at Wellesley and accusing
Tim Russert of piling on. Two really bad moves. Poor me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. (d)None of the above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fortunately, she's not spinning it that way.
speaking of spin....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. She isnt?
WELLESLEY, Mass. (Reuters) - Democrat Hillary Clinton urged women voters on Thursday to rally behind her campaign against "the boys club of presidential politics" two days after male rivals attacked her repeatedly at a debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I hadn't seen that before.
Edited on Thu Nov-01-07 04:25 PM by Bleachers7
You should put it in your original post. That's fucked up. Is that what she's going to say about Putin, Ahmedinajad, Sarkozy, and the rest?

Is she just going to say the boys are mean to her? That's not presidential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. Post #20 below adds some important perspective to that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. You can't spin that. It's gyroscopic; it'll break your wrist.
That is playing the gender card by definition. It's equating any resistance she encounters as evil misogyny. This will not go well for her.

Once again, she's trying to have it both ways. So much for the flawless campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. A lot of women support Hillary, it's not stupid....
To call them to arms.

Look, once again this is just politics and people are acting like they have never, ever seen it before.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. Link please.
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. She doesn't need to do this stuff, if it's about the debate...
Edited on Thu Nov-01-07 05:21 PM by polichick
Hillary's tough ~ she should suck it up and keep going; it wasn't that big a deal.

But if she's just doing her Wellesley thing, it's fine ~ the presidential race is one of the last all-boys clubs and she should be proud of herself for taking it on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Strategery"
She has a grand strategy to win the White House by appearing tough and strong...She's changing tactics to suit the current battlefield...

She's brilliant...She's the Ulysess Grant of this election and her opponents are General Braxton Bragg and General Irvin McDowell...

She plays on a such a different level that mere mortals don't understand her...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Ergo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Ya mean, she's "slick?" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Like Brother Malcom Said
"By any means necessary."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. She's a politician
And the better they are at that game the more "slick" they are.

Last time a politician was called "slick" he was a two term president, despite the attempts by the entire opposition party trying to get him out of office for eight years "by any means necessary", heh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. So true. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. That's who I was thinking of...
It's a family trait that serves them well ~ masters of the game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Except it's not a game - it's our entire lives at stake.
Where does the slickness stop -

- when we just torture a few bad guys?

- when we just have a few soldiers dying in a stupid war?

- when we accept a mediocre appointment to th e Supreme Court because we can't get a great judge approved?

- when we accept a half-assed universal health insurance program because we can't get a decent one through Congress?

I'm tired of people peeing on my shoes and telling me what a lovely spring rain we're having!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. I agree, the "game" is a whole other thing...
For me, it's easy to admire the political talents of Hillary ~ not so easy to support her positions or feel good about the money trail and how it would influence policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. Today she continued to validate those of us who have concerns
To her supporters she was picked on, to those of us who feels she is triangulating, fence sitting, untrustworthy, add whatever...she validated our opinions of her. Will she pick up some women with the boys club comments, I don't know. In my opinion she should let it go and move on or pull a Bill and go beat up Chris Wallace. Anything in between will weaken her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
20. Wellesley - is a womens college - and Hillarys alma mater
so it makes perfect sense that she would say:

"In so many ways, this all women's college prepared me to compete in the all boys club of presidential politics," the former first lady told hundreds of students.

"We need to shatter that highest glass ceiling," added Clinton, who is trying to become the first woman president. "We can make history."

I'm not sure why you think it was a problem for her to speak to them about a womans perspective of politics...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I think it's just the timing that has people questioning it...
It's the perfect thing to say at a school like Wellesley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
23.  I just wish logic would prevail a tiny bit more around here at times.
Edited on Thu Nov-01-07 06:12 PM by wlucinda
I've been seeing quite a few things posted lately, by supporters of various candidates, that try and overlay contraversy onto something, and not putting it into context. Makes me a bit crazy sometimes. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. I know what you mean...
Edited on Thu Nov-01-07 07:00 PM by polichick
Some DUers are amazingly reactionary imo ~ maybe it's a sign of the anxious times or maybe it's just the way people play on the Internet. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. If I were still in college I'd be
changing my major, researching it, and doing a dissertaion.
It fascinates and repels me at the same time. :)
Really mind-boggling stuff at times.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. That would be a great dissertation!
Online sociopaths are both fascinating and repulsive too ~ I've actually done quite a bit of research about them and often thought that would've been a fun dissertation. (Not that I know of any sociopaths here at DU.)

The Internets sure are a hoot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. There would be no lack of material to pull from.
Edited on Thu Nov-01-07 09:35 PM by wlucinda
:D

Barring any real research on my part, I have adopted a "they must be alien pod people" theory. I really can't see any other way to explain their disconnect from reality. I am not too sure it would hold up under scrutiny, but it gets me through an evenings board surfing.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tactical Progressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
24. The male pundits are going apoplectic about Hillary's growing support among women
Men have never seen fit to so much as give a woman even a look at running this country for over two-hundred years.

Now at a woman's college she talks about breaking into the boy's club - I can't think of anything that would be more natural than that kind of conversation, frankly - and the men are all up in arms.

It's hilarious.

The implicit understanding is that 220 years of all-male leadership was in no way biased, so how dare she bring bias into it. Yuh, right.

You go girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. "220 years of all-male leadership was in no way biased"
That's exactly what talking heads like Tucker Carlson seem to think ~ it really is hilarious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tactical Progressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Chris Matthews spent his entire show on it
One mention of the 'boys club' that is national politics in a four-second sentence by Hillary, and Matthews spends an hour frothing all over it. According to him Hillary has been engaging in a "torrent" of female victimization, among other inanities.

Some of his guests were like - well, no, not really - but he didn't want to hear it. His guests are either picked to reinforce his opinion, or otherwise pretty much know that they only get on TV to the extent that they are willing to bow down to the Clinton-hating clown. So they let him talk through his mindless antagonism of Bill & Hill and they try to add some rational thought for filler.

I think that the Washington establishment is scared of Hillary. They want their Republicans to stay and they don't want a woman in power. This is double-bad for them.

And fun for me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Poor Chris...
I think he's afraid his nuts will wither and fall off if Hillary is elected!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
27. The Clinton campaign knows well that 60% of Democrats are women.
The gender card will serve them well in that respect but it may turn off men if she keeps on playing it
through to the Iowa caucuses.

As Harry Truman said, "If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. The Clinton Machine Will Play The Right Card At The Right Time
They are playing high stakes poker and her opponents are playing dime ante and dollar limit poker...It's almost embarrassing to watch the Clinton machine run circles around them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. I have no doubt. I only wish they were this good with Ken Starr.
You live and learn, I guess.

However, as I said, manipulating supporter sentiment is a no-no with me. It is essentially dishonest
and disrespectful to do that.

I wouldn't term her opponents in such demeaning terms, either. Clinton will need their supporters
to win in November '08 should she continue her present trajectory and become our nominee
(although Iowa is a dead heat within the margin of error with Obama according to this week's
University of Iowa poll of likely caucus goers). Insulting them is not conducive to that goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
32. Is she just running for President of women only, then? If Hillary
wants to be taken seriously she needs to realize it is what happens to frontrunners and suck it up.
Playing this game will have a backlash against her.
Mostly it is she is embarrassed by being caught playing those 90s style games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
34. I think it was a statement of pride to her all-women alma mater.
And it is an "all boys club."

I would have a problem if she said, "They're piling on BECAUSE I am a woman." I don't hear her saying that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 18th 2024, 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC