Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's a number: 2007 is 4 U.S. Military deaths away from being the bloodiest year or the Iraq War

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 11:37 AM
Original message
It's a number: 2007 is 4 U.S. Military deaths away from being the bloodiest year or the Iraq War
2007 Toll Nears Highest for US in Iraq

By LAUREN FRAYER – 20 hours ago

BAGHDAD (AP) — With just under two months left in the year, 2007 is on course to be the deadliest year on record for American forces in Iraq, despite a recent sharp drop in U.S. deaths.

At least 847 American military personnel have died in Iraq so far this year — the second-highest annual toll since the war began in March 2003, according to Associated Press figures.

In 2004, the bloodiest year of the war for the U.S. so far, 850 American troops died. Most were killed in large, conventional battles like the campaign to cleanse Fallujah of Sunni militants in November, and U.S. clashes with Shiite militiamen in the sect's holy city of Najaf in August.

But the American military in Iraq has increased its exposure this year, reaching 165,000 troops — the highest levels yet. Moreover, the military's decision to send soldiers out of large bases and into Iraqi communities means more troops have seen more "contact with enemy forces" than ever before, said Maj. Winfield Danielson, a U.S. military spokesman in Baghdad. "It's due to the troop surge, which allowed us to go into areas that were previously safe havens for insurgents," Danielson said. "Having more soldiers, and having them out in the communities, certainly contributes to our casualties."

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gkx-3oYeFwuWKCusr2jrojs98w8wD8SN23400

Press Briefing by Tony Snow
James S. Brady Briefing Room

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
June 15, 2006

Q Tony, American deaths in Iraq have reached 2,500. Is there any response or reaction from the President on that?

MR. SNOW: It's a number, and every time there's one of these 500 benchmarks people want something. The President would like the war to be over now. Everybody would like the war to be over now. And the one thing that we saw in Iraq this week is further testimony to the quality of the men and the women who are doing that, and the dedication and determination to try to ensure that the people of Iraq really do live in a free, effective democracy of their own creation and design.

Any President who goes through a time of war feels very deeply the responsibility for sending men and women into harm's way, and feels very deeply the pain that the families feel. And this President is no different. You've seen it many times. You saw it, you saw it when he was in that ballroom, Terry, and you had this crowd of servicemen and women who were cheering loudly for the President, and he got choked up. So it's always a sad benchmark, and one of the things the President has said is that these people will not die in vain.

And part of what happened this very week when the President went to Baghdad, and he sat down with the Prime Minister and he sat down with the cabinet, and he sat down with the President and Vice President, he sat down with the national security team, and he sat down with the leaders of all the major political parties, what he saw now is that after all of this, what you have in Iraq is a freestanding government that has been elected by the Iraqi people. It has a Prime Minister who is going to be there for four years, who is determined to act as a Prime Minister, who is determined to lead, who is setting priorities, and he's somebody we can work with. You have a Minister of Defense who has significant experience and is already working with his colleagues, not only here at the Pentagon, but also General Casey and others in the field. The President understands that those deaths cannot be in vain, and you've got a government now that can help ensure that that is not the case.

Q Was he told about the benchmark, the President?

MR. SNOW: I don't know. I'm sure he will hear about it.

David.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. This can't be true
Because the unelected President just said last week that we have turned the corner
and our troop being killed per month is going down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The Boy King has no time for foolish things like the "troops killer per month"...
It's like those companies that post the "X days since a work-related injury" signs. I see a low number on the sign and think "Who died last week?"

I'm currently reading Harvey "Swim With The Sharks" MacKay's book "Dig Your Well Before You're Thirsty." He references a quote from Stalin, "A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic." Maybe that's what Tony Snow was thinking of. But MacKay talks about the difference between stories that appeared in The New York Times and Fortune Magazine on the boom in corporate downsizing.

"The Times reported what was happening; Fortune told its readers how to survive it."

So the Bush administration puts a happy marketing face on the war: "FEWER SOLDIERS KILLED THIS MONTH!"

Meanwhile, there's a husband or wife or mother or father or son or daughter who's never going to see their family member again. Ever.

It's not a matter of quantity. It's a matter of we need to get the fuck out of Iraq, once and for all.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I read The Iraq Study Group's report & The End of Iraq by Galbraith.
What this unelected junata failed to say was;

1) Deaths are down overall in some areas because the Shi ites "cleaned out" all
the Sunnis already.

2) In Al Anbar we are paying millions to thugs, war lords, and Islamic Clerics that think
that the 1100's were the the good old days to keep a lid on it for awhile.

Bottom line is we a seen as an army of occupation by the vast majority of Iraqis and
al Qaeda in Iraq (founded 2004) is less than 2% of the people we are fighting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC