Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I would love to see Russia counter this with a "Missile System In Cuba again"!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 10:35 AM
Original message
I would love to see Russia counter this with a "Missile System In Cuba again"!
Edited on Wed Nov-07-07 10:36 AM by LakeSamish706
http://english.pravda.ru/world/americas/07-11-2007/100327-missile_system-0

USA plans to encircle Russia with missiles systems and radars

As long as the U.S. administration conducts talks on the use of Russian radar stations in Azerbaijan and Armavir (the Krasnodar region of Russia), the Pentagon harbors other plans. The USA intends to deploy more elements of its missile defense system to the south of Russia in addition to the missile base in Poland and the radar station in the Czech Republic. The chairman of the US Missile Defense Agency, Lieutenant-General Henry Obering said in the beginning of spring that the United States would like to deploy a radar station in the Caucasian region.


USA plans to encircle Russia with missiles systems and radars (podrobnosti.ua)
USA plans to encircle Russia with missiles systems and radars (podrobnosti.ua)


BREAKING NEWS
USA plans to encircle Russia with missiles and radars
US defense system downs two ballistic missiles outside Earth's atmosphere
Girl born with four arms and four legs has her parasitic twin removed


World's largest land carnivores can be terribly cute
More...


Poland’s National Security Bureau (BBN) showed pictures of the draft missile defense system in Europe to Russian journalists at the end of October. A mobile radar station in the Caspian region was marked on one of the pictures. Spokespeople for the BBN said that the radar was marked on the map by mistake. However, the station can be clearly seen on the map posted on the website of the U.S. Missile Defense Agency. It is a centimetric radar that can be mounted on a mobile platform based on both water and ground surface. The radar allowed for the detection of smaller objects and for a more precise targeting of intercepting missiles.

Spokespeople for the US Missile Defense Agency, the Pentagon and the State Department declined to comment the situation.

A source from the Russian Defense Ministry said in an interview with the Vedomosti newspaper that a radar station deployed near Russia’s southern borders would let the USA control the launches of Iran’s non-existent long-range missiles as well as Russia’s tests of new defense technologies that are presumably conducted in the south of the country and in Kazakhstan.

“If the United States had had serious intentions regarding the deployment of an additional radar station in the Caspian region, Russian military officials would have informed the government on that long ago,” the chairman of the Committee for Defense and Security of Russia’s Federation Council, Viktor Ozerov said.

The USA plans to detect the launches of Iranian missiles with the help of satellites. “The radar is not really needed for the early detection of missile launches. However, if the USA intends to deploy more radars around Russia, the station in the Caucasian region will come in handy. The USA already works on a missile defense system in the Far East. They would need to deploy one more radar somewhere in Mongolia to cover Russia’s territory completely,” the Director of the Center for Disarmament Studies, Anatoly Dyakov said.

From the point of view of the classic nuclear strategy, the defense infrastructure, the building of which we can witness now, can be used against Russia in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. A battery of missiles in Venezuela would certainly make things interesting, also.. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Pravda is the National Inquirer of Russia
While some of this is verifiable, this is such a laughable source, that it renders any serious response, pointless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. And your information about this comes from? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. widely known, but here:
"After the paper was closed down in 1991 by decree of President Yeltsin, many of the staff founded a new paper with the same name, which is now a tabloid-style Russian news source. There is furthermore an unrelated Internet-based newspaper, Pravda Online (www.Pravda.ru). A number of other, less famous, newspapers have also been called Pravda."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pravda

Some Pravda stories:

Mummified mother kills her greedy daughter

http://english.pravda.ru/hotspots/crimes/17-08-2007/96052-mummy-0

Dolphins used to look like humans and lived in Atlantis

http://english.pravda.ru/society/anomal/25-10-2007/99516-dolphins-0

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why?
Edited on Wed Nov-07-07 10:52 AM by northzax
Russia knows it has nothing to fear from this system, why not let us bankrupt ourselves? We can't shoot down a fucking scud or taedong II, you think we'll do much against a russian MIRV ICBM travelling ten times as fast? Let alone a couple thousand of them? Remember that old chestnut that missile defense is like trying to hit a bullet with a bullet? Trying to stop an advanced MIRV ICBM is like trying to stop a shotgun blast with a shotgun blast. they know this. Now imagine trying to stop 5,000 simultaneous shotguns blastsknock out 25%, an incredible feat, and you Still have 15,000k20,000 nuclear warheads hitting you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. "Why"? To let this US Administration know what it feels like to be surrounded...
by another Super Power..... I agree with your points though, about bankrupting ourselves... It just seems to me that Putin has got to be seething inside with this shit happening, and I guess my question is not necessarily a hostile one as much as it is a wondering one as to how Bush would react.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. So you want war?
And more nukes sitting around, just to prove a point? How odd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. You'd love to see Russia with bombs aimed at US in Cuba??
Not even funny as a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC