Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Giuliani prevail & win the Pukes' nomination?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 10:14 AM
Original message
Poll question: Will Giuliani prevail & win the Pukes' nomination?
Edited on Sun Nov-11-07 10:16 AM by Old Crusoe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, maybe not a puma, and maybe not on Xmas eve...but.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. I voted for the puma, but...
No, he will not. I think it's going to be Mittens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Don't count out Jeb quite yet.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Recent polling shows Giuliani leading nationally but trailing in Iowa & NH
and in strong contention in South Carolina, with Romney beginning to move up on the inside rail.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. Let's just hope that Gullini is their choice. He will not stand a chance against any Dem.
and it would be sweeter to beat his sorry ass than just about anyone else they could put on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
37. That's what I thought about bush in 2000. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. He must be rewarded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. An interesting, recent variable is Huckabee's discernible rise in the Iowa
polling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes
Edited on Sun Nov-11-07 11:44 AM by MuseRider
this was being discussed a bit the other day. My big fear now that Brownback is out is Romney/Huckabee. Huck would counter the LDS that the fundies might fear and relieve them enough to allow them to vote for the ticket. Huck is a very likable guy in his interviews and we all know how a regular Joe appeals to the masses. Then there is the good looking factor of Romney. I don't see it but apparently a lot do. These days these qualities seem to matter the most to an awful lot of people, the kind that would vote for a Romney/Huckabee ticket.

I really have no clue but that is where I am right now with the other side.

Edit to add Hey! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Hey there, MuseRider.
Good analysis. I thought of you a bit when ol' Sam dropped out. I was surprised in a way, because in that GOP straw poll in Iowa he almost beat Huckabee.

But evidently his internal polling told him the well was pretty dry and he's stepped aside. Agree with your concern with Huck on a GOP ticket with Romney -- it might serve to neutralize fundies' misgivings about Mitt the Mormon and make that ticket more difficult to defeat.

Still, I'm hopeful. The Pukes are in disarray. They don't know what's happening and it's only a matter of time before they turn on each other in a pre-New Hampshire feeding frenzy, "like rats in a slumfire," to borrow Hunter Thompson's memorable phrase.

Good to run into you on DU. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickgutierrez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. I noticed that, too
If Huckabee finishes second or better in Iowa, he wins the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. That could be exactly right, antiwarwarrior. And I believe Huckabee is
positioned to do just that. I think maybe 2nd to Multiple Choice Mitt. It's still early to say but that would put Rudy at no better than 3rd.

Which would make for an interesting lead-in to New Hampshire a week later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickgutierrez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. The thing I've noticed from Republicans...
...is that they absolutely hate all of their top candidates. Multiple Choice Mitt, 9/11 Giuliani, Empty Suit Thompson, Senile McCain, all of them have easily exploited weaknesses in a general election.

This guy would have the advantage of being a religious nutjob that came out of nowhere, which will give him the 20-something percent that still backs Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Yes -- Huckabee would have that residual % and then some measure of
voters who for various reasons won't support ________ (whichever Democrat is nominated).

The likelihood of the economy or Iraq either one getting suddenly better in the next year is remote, though, at least given current conditions, so the GOP ticket will be laboring in the long shadow of Bush's failures in both Iraq and New Orleans, etc.

We can slam the Republicans on Veterans issues as well, and just never give up until the polls close next November.

Huckabee is dangerous because he could mollify more dissatisfied Republicans than the others, who as you say, are dragging ball-and-chain issues around with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. I don't think so.
Guiliani has wayyyy too many things against him. (Abortion, Gay Rights, Catholic in a fundie world, Kerik, marital situation, and a bunch more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. All true, and it would seem that the steep climb ahead is insurmountable,
but his national polling remains strong.

It kinda makes me nervous. He's one of the most appalling human beings we could possibly find to put in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. If we are very lucky. I certainly hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. You said it. I wouldn't miss him one iota.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yes, I think he will. Rudy has moxie. Mittens does have the
persistence and drive, but voters will end up liking Rudy better, I predict. Huckabee will serve to keep Mitt from getting any momentum out of Iowa--Mitt would have to win by big double digits, or he'll be pronounced a loser there. Rudy will then run a close second in NH, thus being pronounced the "real" winner, and then he'll carry the mojo to SC, MI and the big states. That's how I see it shaping up. I think Thompson was originally hired by the neocons to stop Mitt and help Rudy, but it's not working, so now Huckabee is being promoted relentlessly to fill the role of taking down the Mittster. He may or may not be rewarded with VP. He's a scary doofus, so I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Hi, wienerdoggie. You serve up a plausible scenario. Kind of a SCARY scenario
Edited on Sun Nov-11-07 12:45 PM by Old Crusoe
but plausible just the same.

Rudy does have that iron nerve thing going, which is one of his many more appalling characteristics. I'm hoping that he never again sees the larger poll numbers he had last spring and early summer. I hope his numbers keep falling, and he finishes a dismal third in Iowa (likely behind Romney and Huck) and then just can't put it together for NH or SC.

But I admit that your version is persuasive.

The guy really makes me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thanks. I'm serious about Thompson--he's Cheney's boy, and he
looks like he's sleepwalking through a campaign, almost like he is just going through the motions and has no intention of actually winning the primary. He took hardly any poll numbers from Rudy. May have taken some from McCain. He did knock Mitt down a little--but Mitt sprang back up, so now Huckabee is needed. I don't know if Fred's wife is in on this--she really seems to think she might be First Lady, sadly. Fred is going to leave the race with an acting or radio gig waiting in the wings, a few million in campaign funds, some Turtle Wax and a supply of Rice-a-Roni.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Thompson really does seem like a spectacular dud. For having some acting
experience, he certainly doesn't show much skill at speaking in front of an audience. Maybe Fred likes camera set work and not live stage work. It likely wasn't an issue with Reagan because after a certain point Reagan didn't know where he was at all.

Film director: "You're on a film set, Ronnie."
Reagan: "Great."

Campaign manager: "You're on a political stage, Ronnie."
Reagan: "Great."

It was all the same to Reagan. Thompson doesn't seem to be able to manage his own campaign appearances. So it lends credence to your theory. Agree also on Fred's wife. She doesn't appear to be aware that her husband's polling is tanking big time.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. Yeah, he was like the little engine that could but in this case he
got some bad gas and he needs an oil change not to mention his brakes and shocks need replacing.
I like him still though on Law & Order as an actor but I would not ever vote for him as I disagree with him on to many issues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. Damn it! I voted "no" before I saw the option about the puma and Christmas Eve....
Wish I could change my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Your intention to vote for the puma option is duly noted and genuinely respected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Thank you....At this point, it seems the most logical assumption under the circumstances.....
But I've been wrong before
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. Ron Paul's campaign is said to be buying upwards of $100,000 in ad time in
Iowa, beginning early this coming week.

I don't have stats at the ready to suggest that a more prevalent profile for Paul would subtract from Rudy's totals from "independent Republicans" or "libertarian Republicans" but if that percentage is even slightly significant, combined with Huckabee's possible surge among the more far-right Republicans who vote in primaries, plus Rudy's own lackluster Iowa effort, it could mean he gets buried alive by midnight January 3rd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejanocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. Does $100,000 get you much air time in Iowa? In Texas it's $1,000,000 a day to do a half-assed job
of covering most major media markets statewide. I figured Iowa would be cheaper but I didn't realize it would be THAT much cheaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Hi, Tejanocrat. Good question.
And quite a bit would be riding on it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. GOP voters are largely ideologues
Can't really know who's going to win. Polls say Giuliani, but the ideologues hate the guy. And they vote in droves without fail. So who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. They do vote just as you say they do. They might really knock Rudy for a loop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejanocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
27. No. He will finish 3rd (at best) in Iowa after Willard and Huckabible; 4th (at best) in NH after
Willard and McCrazy and/or Paul and/or Huckabible.

This will cause him to drop to 3rd (at best) in SC.

With three primaries where he finishes 3rd or worse, he'll fizzle on Super-Duper Tuesday.

I'm saying the Repub nominee odds are 50% Willard, 30% Ghouliani, 15% McCrazy, 5% Huckabible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. A bit off topic but gotta say I love your nickname for Huckabee -- Huckabible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #34
44. "Huckabible" sent a little coffee toward my computer screen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
29. I went with the puma but that's wishful thinking.
I think he'll get the big states on Super Tuesday after losing Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
31. He's dancing to their tune
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
35. No. It's Romney for sure (nt).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. Romney's the one with instutional support
He's got the nom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #38
41. Multiple Choice Mitt has a pile of cash he's dumping into the race, too.
His old man was unexceptional. Willard is evidently smarter and shrewder but has a very high creep factor.

And he leads in Iowa and New Hampshire, which augurs ill for Giuliani. Losses in both those two "headline" primary states would weaken Rudy for the big Tuesday cluster to follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
36. Bernard Kerik is the albatross Rudy now wears around his neck. And it stinks.(eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
39. Hey Crusoe
I'm hoping not, but thinking so...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. Hi, BBDB. Well I definitely hear you on the "hoping not" part. He's a guy
who seems to like to bully and shove to get his way, and he sounds a lot more belligerent than Dubya.

No a good mix for a president after 7-8 years of alienating our allies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
42. If Republicans had any brains, they would just concede the election and go quietly to jail.
Edited on Mon Nov-12-07 07:37 AM by Perry Logan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. And a desirable outcome that would be. The jail part, I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. With the candidatest they have to offer this go around they kind
of conceded already in my opinion. Guiliani could do ok in the general. Only hope for him is if he is running against Hillary. I think any other R get's crushed pretty good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC