|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:32 PM Original message |
Poll question: Now that Edwards has completely tanked, who will rise to third place? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
1. Tanked? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
2. Clinton or maybe Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Superman Returns (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
3. Biden or Richardson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. "Clinton/Clark or Clinton/Richardson" sounds reasonable to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihelpu2see (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:13 PM Response to Reply #17 |
49. yuck and maybe nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 02:13 AM Response to Reply #17 |
109. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 11:29 AM Response to Reply #3 |
132. Right now it looks likes Clinton - Obama - Biden - the others. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bright Eyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
4. I don't think he tanked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:41 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. "it'd be Kucinich" that'd shake things up, wouldn't it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:28 PM Response to Reply #4 |
55. I agree on both counts. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueStater (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
5. Keep dreaming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
6. I'm not sure he's tanked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:42 PM Response to Reply #6 |
21. "Biden seems to be attracting a lot of notice" He might be the smartest candidate, imo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:45 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. I know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginchinchili (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 10:06 PM Response to Reply #21 |
90. I, too, supported Wes Clark in 2004. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 01:32 AM Response to Reply #90 |
102. I didn't know that, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brothertheodore (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 12:07 PM Response to Reply #102 |
139. moving ahead with Biden... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 03:17 AM Response to Reply #6 |
115. Not much. Yet. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lyonn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 01:17 PM Response to Reply #115 |
142. Kinda like Hillary tanked a few weeks ago? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacebird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
7. Tanked? Really? LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
8. hum, I'd say Biden or Richardson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:44 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. Joe and Bill deserve more attention than the MSM have been giving them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
9. I doubt the debate will make any difference at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
10. He was already in the tank... the only reason he was EVER considered "top tier" is because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:46 PM Response to Reply #10 |
24. If not for Kerry, he'd be "who was that guy, again"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueStater (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:47 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Talk about irony |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:49 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Go do some research on her background before you make a fool of yourself. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:51 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. a wealthy attorney somewhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueStater (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:53 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. No need to be a dick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:56 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brothertheodore (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 12:15 PM Response to Reply #34 |
140. No Bill, no Hilary... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:59 PM Response to Reply #25 |
37. And If Edwards hadn't saved Clinton's sorry butt by representing him in the Impeachment proceedings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:19 PM Response to Reply #37 |
51. Urban legend, being sold by the Edwards shills. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 12:06 AM Response to Reply #51 |
93. This is a really uninformed statement.Edwards is easily the best trial lawyer in the nation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas_Kat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 01:36 AM Response to Reply #93 |
103. Maybe 'best' plaintiff's attorney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 12:37 AM Response to Reply #51 |
95. And here are some "facts" for you and they are just the basics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
desi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:45 PM Response to Reply #37 |
68. Sorry... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:50 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. Oh no! Facts!! You know how the Edwardians hate facts!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 12:39 AM Response to Reply #71 |
96. And a "repeat of "facts" for you! Sheesh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 01:11 AM Response to Reply #37 |
98. I am late responding to this late but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 01:42 AM Response to Reply #98 |
106. It's very sad isn't it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 01:59 AM Response to Reply #106 |
108. No, it's not sad. But it's very telling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 02:36 AM Response to Reply #108 |
111. Go ahead.It was Clinton's sorry butt. If he had never gotten a blow job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 02:41 AM Response to Reply #98 |
112. Certainly not.Where did you even get that from? Clinton didn't deserve |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 11:53 AM Response to Reply #98 |
136. Thank you, cat_girl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:49 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. The guy lost a debate to Cheney for christs sake... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:01 PM Response to Reply #28 |
39. That was really embarrassing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:05 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. At least Edwards delivered the South! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:06 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Well, he can't win elections but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:17 PM Response to Reply #28 |
50. People were terrified |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katmondoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 09:02 AM Response to Reply #28 |
124. I agree with Lirwin2. This has always been on my mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 08:00 AM Response to Reply #24 |
122. That's because.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 03:21 AM Response to Reply #10 |
116. Brrrrr! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
11. I don't think it's Edwards who's "completely tanked" right now. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
12. I wish Kucinich would move all the way up, but realistically Biden wil be the one to surpass Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:47 PM Response to Reply #12 |
26. "...Richardson or Kucinich will also end up ahead of Edwards before it's all over." Both, imo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
13. Supposedly Hillary tanked after the last debate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:40 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. C'mon, lets be honest- there was nothing for Edwards to tank |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:55 PM Response to Reply #18 |
32. You sure are a great persuader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:12 PM Response to Reply #32 |
48. Haters can never be convinced anyways |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:34 PM Response to Reply #48 |
59. Got a mirror handy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:41 PM Response to Reply #59 |
65. I admit it, I'm a hater |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:48 PM Response to Reply #65 |
69. Like the Republicans you have a rationalization why your behavior is ok and others are wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:50 PM Response to Reply #69 |
72. Sorry, my position is unchanged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 09:49 PM Response to Reply #72 |
88. That's ok, neither has mine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lyonn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 01:46 PM Response to Reply #72 |
143. Some of us are not haters, just disappointed....nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
14. A flawed premise to begin with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 09:47 AM Response to Reply #14 |
126. all I ever see are flawed premises disguised as polls from certain posters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
15. Hillary the air buzzard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Josiah1982 (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 12:55 AM Response to Reply #15 |
97. wow, that sounds like something one would see on another site. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 02:47 AM Response to Reply #97 |
113. It doesn't count if it's about Hillary, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Josiah1982 (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 04:28 AM Response to Reply #113 |
118. hello seasonedblue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 11:54 AM Response to Reply #118 |
137. I don't know, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 08:12 PM Response to Reply #97 |
150. No! It is something you'd see in the sky or the desert. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
16. Nice try. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
29. Now that the Hillary shills have tanked, can they manage four sentences in a thread starting post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #29 |
36. Ding! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
33. From the looks of this poll, looks like people who voted think you mean with the MSM. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
35. Considering he's in a 3-way statistical tie for first place in Iowa, I'd say this OP is premature. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. Your "new" poll was taken before Las Vegas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:33 PM Response to Reply #42 |
58. So, You're Assumption Is Worth More? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:37 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. You rely on out dated polls if you want, I'll stick with keeping up to date. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 07:07 PM Response to Reply #63 |
147. Since when is "keeping up to date" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
38. Now that you've stopped beating your wife... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:09 PM Response to Reply #38 |
46. It's a litttle deeper than that:: the OP hates trial lawyers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:27 PM Response to Reply #46 |
54. Only the ones who think they deserve 1/3 of the victims settlement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueStater (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:35 PM Response to Reply #54 |
61. "Ambulance chaser". Amusing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:41 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. I rest my case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:45 PM Response to Reply #64 |
67. That's lawyer-speak for I can't bill anyone for more hours, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 01:57 AM Response to Reply #67 |
107. And Hillary represented her corporate masters for free? Give me a break! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:43 PM Response to Reply #61 |
66. Oops. I mean O! He's so wonderful riding down from the Rainbow on his Unicorn!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:55 PM Response to Reply #66 |
75. He's so dreamy too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:57 PM Response to Reply #66 |
76. I'm not the one obsessed- that distinction seeems to belong to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fadedrose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
40. Gee I hope not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
41. Well, I don't know if he's "tanked" but the angry man thing isn't working... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
45. I guess you only read News that has been certified by Clinton apologists... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:11 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Here is your link.... read it and weep ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last_texas_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:27 PM Response to Reply #47 |
53. Hey, what are you doing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:31 PM Response to Reply #47 |
57. Your linked to blogger says Edwards has tanked. Thanks for the link! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
52. Biden 68%, Kucinich 24% - just about what I though the result would be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
56. Biden-nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:34 PM Response to Reply #56 |
60. I voted Biden too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
62. I don't think Edwards has tanked. He is doing fine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alteredstate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
70. Edwards hasn't tanked. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
73. I don't think he did as poorly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 09:08 PM Response to Reply #73 |
83. Well yes, he did better than Obama, I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 09:11 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. He just needs to stop attacking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 09:13 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. He'll stop. Sooner or later, he'll stop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 02:34 AM Response to Reply #86 |
110. Now if only you'd stop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 09:49 AM Response to Reply #110 |
127. Qutzupalotl, may I ask: "Have you ever posted that to the Hill Haters?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 05:07 PM Response to Reply #127 |
144. Is that what this is about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
74. Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
77. Deleted message |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 09:02 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. thank you - well said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 09:37 PM Response to Reply #77 |
87. Bullshit posts such as theirs only solidify my non-vote if she gets the nom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 01:40 AM Response to Reply #77 |
105. Amen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
here_is_to_hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 11:42 AM Response to Reply #77 |
133. Thanks for expressing what I am feeling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
78. Definitely THE best poll of the week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
80. This poll is BULLSHIT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 09:08 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Deleted message |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 09:10 PM Response to Reply #80 |
84. When a HillHater puts a Clinton logo in their posts, is that sockpuppetry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Josiah1982 (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 04:33 AM Response to Reply #84 |
119. This place is starting to get really bizzare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 10:13 AM Response to Reply #119 |
129. It's always puzzled me why somethings are allowed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
81. Biden 63%, Kucinich 27% - Dennis is closing the gap!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
89. your attempts to diminish edwards are transparent and pathetic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginchinchili (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
91. I don't think Edwards has tanked, but I do think he's hit his ceiling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
92. I'm not so sure that Edwards has "tanked" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rowdyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
94. In what alternate universe did Edwards tank? Was Kirk, Picard or Cisco captain at the time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CyberPieHole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 01:14 AM Response to Original message |
99. Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elelctric Slim (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
100. Nice try |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 01:32 AM Response to Original message |
101. i don't believe any voting has taken place yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FatDave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 01:38 AM Response to Original message |
104. Get ready to hit "alert" MethuenProgressive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 03:15 AM Response to Original message |
114. Biden. And then he'll be second place, and then the front runner, and then.....nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 09:41 AM Response to Reply #114 |
125. I agree Biden has the best chance to move the highest, and Edwards has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 03:24 AM Response to Original message |
117. What the hell are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 07:17 AM Response to Original message |
120. Richardson has been in fourth for some time, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 08:17 AM Response to Reply #120 |
123. Actually, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 08:09 PM Response to Reply #123 |
149. "subtle uptick"???? You mean from 2% to 4%? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreeStateDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 07:47 AM Response to Original message |
121. .Puke spin rule: If you tell a lie enough times some dimwits start to believe it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 10:09 AM Response to Reply #121 |
128. Yeah. "Warmonger" "Bad Tipper" "Cat Killer" "Corporate Whore"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 11:55 AM Response to Reply #128 |
138. Don't forget: "Unelectable" "flip-flopper" "masculine" "shrill" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 06:51 PM Response to Reply #138 |
145. And the latest: "Poor Personal Hygiene" how low will they stoop? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluecrush (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
130. A leading question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
131. Biden increase lead! 72% to 20% over Kucinich!! Richardson gets 5 votes!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 11:44 AM Response to Reply #131 |
134. The fact that 20% of people here believe Kucinich will become a top-tier candidate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 11:49 AM Response to Reply #134 |
135. Kucinich has huge DU support, I think the DK folks are being realistic in the poll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
141. I don't think he has tanked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
146. biden, almost by default |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 09:17 PM Response to Reply #146 |
151. I think... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 09:29 PM Response to Reply #151 |
152. you could be right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-17-07 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
148. Desperate Spin by the Edwards haters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Steely_Dan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 02:39 AM Response to Original message |
153. Little Doubt About... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 07:44 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC