NY Times: Questions about Carville and CNN

There are very few political analysts more closely associated with the Clintons than James Carville, who was a key adviser to Mr. Clinton in the 1992 campaign.

So it’s no surprise that Mr. Carville’s appearance on a round table after last night’s CNN-sponsored Democratic debate is arousing some morning-after controversy.

“Would it kill CNN to disclose that James Carville is a partisan Clinton supporter when talking about the presidential race?” wrote Daily Kos. “Would it kill James Carville to disclose that he is a partisan Clinton supporter when on the air talking about the presidential race? Apparently so.”

Last night, Anderson Cooper of CNN introduced Mr. Carville, who appeared alongside panelists David Gergen and J.C. Watts, as a “former presidential adviser.”

And Mr. Cooper made one attempt at a disclosure: “I should point out David Gergen was an adviser in the Bill Clinton White House,” he said. “As, of course, was James Carville.”

But he didn’t point out that Mr. Carville is also an informal adviser to Mrs. Clinton’s campaign.

Last night, Mr. Carville praised Mrs. Clinton’s performance along with the other panelists. “I agree with David and J.C.,” he said at one point. “I think that Senator Clinton’s people have to be — and Senator Clinton — have to be pretty pleased tonight that they certainly reversed a trend. We will see where it goes from there.”

And he was pointedly critical of Mr. Obama’s debate performance. “I think he might be even slightly intimidated, that he thinks Senator Clinton is more experienced than him, a little more hungry than he is,” Mr. Carville said.

There is also a fair amount of criticism of CNN’s overall conduct of the debate, especially Wolf Blitzer’s questions.

We put in a call to CNN and will update this post when they get back to us.

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/16/questions-about-carville-begala-and-cnn/index.html?ex=1352955600&en=317b271e274e669e&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

As a senior advisor to Dick Cheney?

...why didn't they disclose the identity of Campbell Brown's husband?

Who is he?

Can't stand Carville. I liked him during Clinton's impeachment, but started to really dislike him when Dean was running.

I have no use for the man, or the DLC.

Wouldn't it be great if republicans could pick and choose the people they like instead of following like sheep?

Don't hold your breath!

they should have people speaking for the other candidates too.

Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

all the otehr candidates.

Having him on the panel is worse than the spin rooms where they get a supporter of each candidate to declare how well their particular did. At least that's out in the open.

But having 2 (including Gergan) spinmeisters on as "analysts" without disclosing their connections to a candidate is deceitful.

the truth and democracy.