Chris Dodd's perfect squelch

http://www.salon.com/politics/roadies/

Chris Dodd's perfect squelch

MARSHALLTOWN, Iowa -- The boast remains the centerpiece of Hillary Clinton's campaign and the former first lady sold it aggressively during Thursday night's Democratic debate: "It is important that we have a candidate who is tested and a president who is ready to lead from Day 1." Chris Dodd, who has served in Congress during six different presidencies, has been responding with the perfect squelch.

Speaking Saturday afternoon at the local Democratic headquarters here, Dodd took aim at the front-runner when he declared, "Anybody who stands before you and says, 'I'm ready to do the job on Day 1' ought to be disqualified. This is unique, this job. {When} you can sit behind the desk in the Oval Office, you can be better prepared and I believe I am. But you can't be totally prepared for this." In an interview afterward, Dodd suggested the proper attitude for anyone who inherits the White House in 2009: "They ought to be nervous."

During the question period in Marshalltown, the silver-haired Connecticut senator went after Clinton's television-ad claim that only she can pass healthcare reform because she "has the scars to prove it." With his voice dripping with derision, Dodd said, "The political scars are nothing. The scars" -- for people still without healthcare -- "are far more important than any bruises you got because you were in a political battle ... If repeated failure is an advertisement for the presidency, then George Bush should be considered the greatest American president in history."

A Sunday morning hunch: This is the first time that you are encountering these Dodd quotes. Calling Dodd a voice in the wilderness understates the loneliness of his underdog campaign. Nonetheless, it is a vile rumor that you can reckon the number of Iowa voters at a Dodd event on the fingers of both hands. To count the house properly in Marshalltown would have also required the removal of both shoes. And instead of network TV crews, Dodd was trailed by a photographer who specializes in taking pictures of candidates with an updated version of a 19th century hooded view camera.

Yet there is a reason to take Dodd and his Senate counterpart Joe Biden (half) seriously. Surprising candidates can emerge out of the cornfields during the closing weeks before the Iowa caucuses. There remains a glimmer of a possibility (please, please do not call your bookie upon reading these words) that Dodd, Biden or Bill Richardson could have a spotlight moment by successfully hijacking the ready-to-lead-on-Day-1 issue.

For all of Hillary Clinton's eight tumultuous years in the White House, for all of Barack Obama's legislative victories in the Illinois state Senate, for all of John Edwards' courtroom triumphs, the three Iowa favorites collectively have only served 17 years in elected national office. In contrast, Dodd and Biden have each spent more than three decades on Capitol Hill. Yes, they often sound like stentorian senators rather than carefully choreographed candidates. But they do boast the traditional kind of Washington experience that was supposed to be required for future presidents after the towers tumbled and our world was upended on 9/11.

Having written these last two dreamy paragraphs, I will now rejoin political reality by rushing off to spend the afternoon trailing Obama.
― Walter Shapiro

'stentorian senators' than 'carefully choreographed candidates'. That's probably why I'm so strongly drawn to them over The Three.

Thanks for another good and thought-provoking read, babylonsister.

I'm watching both closely and both have actually been leading by doing important work lately.

I thought it is worth emphasizing.

Wading waist deep through all the shredded paper is going to be exhausting.

They should at least start the primary race in September if only to conserve energy.

Thanks a lot for this, babylonsister. Kind of reassuring to know that there is at least one reporter out there who is paying attention, even if temporarily, to the so-called "second tier" candidates.
But, even more , his article also has important things to say about the election process and the presidency that are definitely worth reading, and thinking about.

He values the importance of saying what you feel, not what others want to hear.

Maybe other DUers will come to the same conclusion? :-)

:hi:

he's my number two, and i may vote for him instead of kucinich depending on how he does prior to my late state's primary.

Bam! Down goes Hillary.

Does anyone else remember that great Saturday Evening Post feature, "The Pefect Squelch"? (Is anyone else as old as I am?) :)

:evilgrin:

Babs, as usual. Always a fan of your finds, but you need to stretch your wings and write a few pieces. You know quality writing when you see it, but I want to see some of you personal scathing criticism in print.