Where is Edwards going to direct his attacks now that Hillary is no longer the frontrunner?

calteacherguy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 07:42 PM
Original message

Where is Edwards going to direct his attacks now that Hillary is no longer the frontrunner?

This is going to be interesting to watch...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

PresidentObama

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 07:43 PM
Response to Original message

1. Hillary isn't the frontrunner, anymore?

Did I miss something?

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

calteacherguy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1

2. Perhaps you did. nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

PresidentObama

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #2

3. I'm not a Hillary supporter, but proof?

She's still the frontrunner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ccpup

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #3

6. probably referring to the Iowa Poll

that has Obama at 30, Hillary at 26 and Edwards at 22, I think

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

PresidentObama

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #6

7. Leading ONE poll in Iowa is enough to topple Hillary as a frontrunner?

Don't think so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ccpup

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #7

10. I don't either

but I'm not grasping at straws, so ... :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

waiting for hope

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 07:47 PM
Response to Original message

4. If you are referring to Obama -

save it, I think there would a serious debate about the issues for once if it came down to Edwards and Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Captain Hilts

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #4

8. Hillary's the policy wonk in that threesome. And she's missed the fewest votes in the Senate. nt

Edited on Mon Nov-19-07 07:59 PM by MookieWilson

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Windy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #4

14. agreed!!!! Wouldn't it be Loverly??? :o) n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Evergreen Emerald

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #4

17. why would they stop what they are doing now?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ccpup

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 07:48 PM
Response to Original message

5. who knows

perhaps Little Johnny Temper Tantrum is going to have to start offering something of substance instead of just yelling about ... well, whatever he's yelling at Hillary about that day.

And I'll never forget the very brief condescending look he gave Dennis during the debate the other night. Almost as if the Real John Edwards crawled out for a second while glaring at the man who dared question one of his most recent attacks/resume builders.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

PresidentObama

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #5

9. "start offering something of substance" Hmmm seems to me Edwards has done that on all issues.

From healthcare, where he was the first to lay out a plan, on down.

Most critics even agree he's been the most vocal in what he'd do as President, and he's showed America exactly how he'll lead as President with his vision and proposals.

And oh, showcasing the differences between himself and Senator Clinton isn't yelling. It's fair criticism and a fair compare and contrast to make. As far as I've seen, and I follow him fairly closely, Edwards ISN'T yelling about anything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ccpup

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #9

11. ok n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

mtnsnake

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 07:58 PM
Response to Original message

12. Is that what you teach your students, that she's not the frontrunner anymore?

Just because she doesn't lead in Iowa?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

PresidentObama

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #12

15. Well, she's not leading in Iowa. Nor is Obama, though. Or Edwards.

The race, from what I'm seeing, is up in the air in that state.

Plus even if she was losing in Iowa, she's still leading in other states (New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina)

As far as I'm concerned, and I don't support her, she's the frontrunner.

Period.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Adelante

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 07:59 PM
Response to Original message

13. We need a few polls to confirm this before we announce

Clinton is dead as a doornail in Iowa and she remains the frontrunner nationally. Still, I am pumped by this poll. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Reno.Muse

(307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-19-07 09:36 PM
Response to Original message

16. He was nailing Bush and the neocons and rich healthcare agencies

when I heard him speak yesterday in Reno, Nevada. Oh, can't forget that he also nailed Blackwater, etc. Want more?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Thu May 09th 2024, 08:59 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.