Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why are only 16% of U.S. Senators women, when women comprise more than 55% of the U.S. population?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 10:42 PM
Original message
Poll question: Why are only 16% of U.S. Senators women, when women comprise more than 55% of the U.S. population?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Boobs just aren't Senatorial. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Too many sexist dingleberries vote.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. being a man..i know for a fact....
that mostest of the womams arnt as smart as us men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Women are quickly closing the gap
It wasn't all that long ago that there was only 1. Now three states have two women each with another 10 having one. To my knowledge only two women running this time are in any kind of trouble and one of those will likely face a female opponent. One of our best shots at a seat is a woman. I could easily see us gaining another couple women this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Because you don't have enough women running.
The men are the ones running and they usually don't have women opponents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-22-07 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. We need more women in local and state government
The "farm team" (if you'll excuse a sports analogy) is short of women. We need to encourage women to run for city councils, school boards, state legislatures. From there they can aspire to and run for higher offices. There are many organizations that seek out and train women to run. I encourage as many women as I can to get involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. look no further than this------->


for a reason
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Maybe U.S. Senators should be paid no more than minimum wage?
Then the problem of pay equity might tend to convert the U.S. Senate into a pink collar ghetto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. I had a twenty minute conversation with the first woman ever elected
who had not been previously appointed. Gosh I am old, but not as old as she was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-22-07 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. why run ...
when there are so many shoes to buy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobendorfer Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-22-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. another interesting question
If you removed all of the lawyers from Congress, how many senators/reps would be left? 3?
I'm sure it's not that bad, but certainly laywers are serve in Congress far, far beyond their proportion of the population ( < 1% )

The _Ecotopia_ guy (Callenbach?) wrote another little thought-experiment called "A Citizen Legislature".
In this book he proposed electing representatives and senators by lottery.
I don't think he was serious about it really, it was just a rhetorical device to demonstrate just how NON-representative of the American people Congress is.
In such a system, assuming a good random process, you'd get proportional representation by gender and ethnicity, but ALSO by economics criteria too. That is, out of 535 congress-critters, you would have 3-4 lawyers ( instead of the 400+ we have now ), a couple of doctors, a couple of business executives, a somewhat larger cohort of teachers ... but the overwhelming majority of reps and senators would be blue-collar and retail workers.

J.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC