Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sam Tannenhaus of AEI on C-Span II laid out the case for Clinton Conservatism.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 09:41 AM
Original message
Sam Tannenhaus of AEI on C-Span II laid out the case for Clinton Conservatism.
Edited on Sun Nov-25-07 10:23 AM by KoKo01
Very interesting discussion on C-Span this a.m. discussing Politics in America by Tanenhaus (NY Review of Books) about conservatism in America focusing on the Straussian, Frum,Kristol, Buckley, etc. views and differences in the Conservative movement through Hoover, Nixon, Johnson, Reagan.

His theory was that Conservatives who compromise like Nixon, Reagan and Johnson contrast with Bush II's policies. He claims that Bush II started out as a great compromiser and he feels that it was "9/11" and the holdovers from Nixon Administration who felt that Nixon had been destroyed by the liberal Washington Post that molded Bush's Imperialism in his Presidency. His view is that Conservatism must get back to "compromise" to survive.

His view about Bill Clinton was that he was like Eisenhower...a benevolent Republican Compromiser but it was the hard uncompromising Conservatives who attacked his Presidency. He feels Hillary will be like Nixon. She's an unloved figure but could be a very good Compromising Conservative who would restore Congress to it's role. He feels that Giuliani would be the best Compromiser for the new Conservatives, though.

THE AEI has spoken. William Kristol and the rest would be very happy with either Hillary or Giuliani. And, it doesn't matter what the Religious Right thinks because Tannenhouse feels their time is over in influence because our culture has become so much more accepting of race and gender that the issue is dying.

As I said...the American Enterprise Institute has spoken. (In the audience were Kristol, Frum and assorted other intellectuals of the Right. We've got your choices now of which candidates the DRE Machines will elect in '08.


----------

TPM's Jim Sleeper has a great critque of the nutty Tannenhaus here....

http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2007/oct/10/the_cloud_over_sams_book_club
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Comments on Sam Tannenhaus's Views by TPM's Jim Sleeper..
Edited on Sun Nov-25-07 10:23 AM by KoKo01
The Cloud Over Sam's Book Club
Jim Sleeper's picture
By Jim Sleeper | bio

A former editor at the New York Times Book Review who read my remonstrance here about its war-hawkish bent referred me to something I’d missed: In July, Book Review editor Sam Tanenhaus took to the literary section of The New Republic to pen his second elegy to American conservatism in those pages. His meditation on the allure and dangers for writers of false promises of politico-moral clarity could have been an elegy for his own stewardship at the Times. And maybe it was.

Reminding us that the anti-Communist crusader Whittaker Chambers eventually escaped the "haunted air" of ideological crusading in his later years, Tanenhaus decides that were Chambers alive today he would dismiss the Bush Administration’s zeal to rid the world of Evil: “Not every good fight is a millennial fight. George W. Bush's worldview is precisely the one that Whittaker Chambers outgrew. It is a punishing irony, and one can imagine all too easily how Chambers himself would have greeted it: with the sly half-smile of a melancholy man who knows better.”

I think that Tanenhaus is signaling that he knows better now, too. It is too late for him to say that he knew better all along.

section break

His earlier elegy for conservatism in The New Republic came in a twilight portrait of William F. Buckley, Jr., and it put me in mind of a younger conservative -- Scott McConnell of The American Conservative magazine -- who “knew better” what had happened to American conservatism years before Tanenhaus and Buckley acknowledged it. Regrets like theirs might have mattered in 2004 had they and other conservatives joined McConnell to oppose George W. Bush's re-election.

In an American Conservative editorial McConnell ignored the quasi-triumphalist reviews of pro-Bush books which Tanenhaus was then pumping into the national bloodstream (one lauded tabloid mini-con John Podhoretz’s pugilistic defense of Bush). Instead McConnell tendered an anguished endorsement of John Kerry because, he warned, Bush’s “continuation in office will discredit any sort of conservatism for generations.”

more...and it's a great read...
http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2007/oct/10/the_cloud_over_sams_book_club
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC