Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The DMR poll raises the stakes for Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KingofNewOrleans Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 12:52 AM
Original message
The DMR poll raises the stakes for Obama
The poll portrays him a the frontrunner and bases his frontrunner status on a huge influx of first time caucus goers, including large chunks of Independents and even a sizeable number of Republicans.

If this does happen, then Obama is going to get a huge Mongo-sized bounce out of Iowa, especially going into NH where independents can play a big role too. He doesn't just win, he generates big turnout and crossover (or apolitcal) support while winning.


The flip side is that if the surge of new caucus goers don't turn out (or never knew where to caucus or were too busy doing 18-34 yr old stuff, etc...) then Obama probably doesn't win and the fabled crossover appeal means doo-dah.

The logistics and reliability of getting new caucus-goers to show up is quite daunting, so there's reason to be skeptical that it will occur. The turnout he generates at many of his rallies suggests it's possible.

Either way, the stakes for Obama have definitely gotten higher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obama has TREMENDOUS crossover appeal...
that is represented in the new DMR poll. Independents love him, and more than one Republican has supported him publically. It's not outside the realm of possibility that he'll draw an entirely new group of voters. He's the only CANDIDATE...not only Democrat, but CANDIDATE that can SWEEP the General Election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zueda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I also believe his background in community organizing...
is going to play notable roll in turning out the votes. He has an awesome grassroots game. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingofNewOrleans Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. We'll find out
If the newcomers turn out, it'll confirm that, if they don't then he ain't got game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Independents in the DMR poll
Obama 39%
Clinton 15%
Edwards 24%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Um....err....don't we need the independents to win in november?
Who has the best shot at winning them over?

There are basically 40% Republicans no matter what. And 40% Democrats no matter what. It is the remaining 20% that decide every election.

Seems like Obama scores best among the independents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. People are spining the piss out of this poll
but the one truth they can't get around is what it says about Obama's electability relative to Clinton and Edwards. He gets indies, Republicans and new voters (i.e.youth) to come out for him in big numbers. This is the main message that I hope will sink in with primary voters around the country. This guy has the potential to win by such a healthy margin that he actually might be able to govern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingofNewOrleans Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. It says he wins if he get indies, Rep, and new voters
out to vote for him. He has to prove that Thursday night. If they don't materialize then it shoots a big gaping whole in that argument. That's why the stakes have been raised for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. I like your thinking
I agree whole heartedly. It will be interesting to see this one pan out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. It also creates a "comeback kid" scenario for Hillary
Which we'll know happened if the poll proves to be wildly off base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Gees....the hillary crowd is dissing the validity of the poll...but now she is a comeback kid
...on the basis of a poll they thought was suspect in the first place?

Only Hillary Triangulists could come up with a mouthful like that. The poll is either accurate or not. If it is not, then she can't claim comeback kid status as a result. That is just silly!

I know the phrase comeback kid is dear to some clintonians' hearts. But come on now. Just 12 hours ago, people were pretty grim about Obama here. So if anything, Obama is the comeback kid for the time being at least! That may change tomorrow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Psst, I am not a Hillary supporter
Edited on Tue Jan-01-08 01:35 AM by sandnsea
I'm simply saying that the only possible benefit this poll can have to Hillary is that it creates a possible "comeback kid" scenario. I have watched enough wild goings-on that I don't put anything past anybody. Meaning it wouldn't surprise me AT ALL to learn somebody intentionally screwed with the poll to help Hillary, or anybody else for that matter. People aren't as ethical as they pretend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. So Republicans Are Crossing Over To Vote For Barack Hussein Obama?
Edited on Tue Jan-01-08 01:03 AM by BeatleBoot
Wow, who would have thunk it? :sarcasm:

We are so fucked as a party.

And the people here are too stupid to get it.

Unbelievable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Are you suggesting Obama supporters are somehow stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Are you putting words in my mouth?
As a Barack Hussein Obama supporter, it's a prerequisite to do that isn't it?

Because that's all I have heard from Obama supporters on this board: create a strawman, then tear it down.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'm asking you a question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Okay, here's my answer.
The question: Are Obama supporters stupid?

The answer: No.

Meanwhile, back in reality, the Republicans want Barack Hussein Obama to be the Democratic nominee.

Rove et al are licking their chops, thus the cross-over vote in Iowa.

Not unlike McCain winning the Michigan primary in 2000 (it was an open primary and Dems could vote. They voted McCain because they disdain Bush)

We are so fucked as a party.

So fucked.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Some would disagree with your assessment
Some would see Hillary as the candidate that the Rovians would most like to see as the nominee.

Obama may be quite different. Unlike Hillary, Obama has a more positive message, speaks of hope, can attract independents and crossovers whereas Hillary cannot. Hillary cannot even campaign on the iraq war because she supported it and would look like just another of her switching sides for political gain flip flops if she did.

I think it amazing, actually, if the des moines poll is accurate that so many independents are now drawn to the race. If this is true we have a new wave in politics that the old way of thinking couldn't predict or understand. Attracting new voters to the mix. This is absolutely inspirational. And, the great thing about it, the candidate doing it is a black man, someone who in times past people would not think he would have a chance to run, let alone attract new voters. Heck, the only ones I have seen saying a black man can't win are Hillary supporters. So much for the old fashioned way of looking at things. So 90s....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Great post, earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Thank you for a civilized post. I appreciate that.
Let me be clear.

Barack Obama is okay with me. I am a Yellow Dog Democrat.

But are you sure they are all independents crossing over? Or are Republicans, too? And what is their motive?

I am old enough to have seen this play out before.

Michigan Dems were all saying to each other back in 2000, "we can't believe the Republicans opened up their primary so that we could vote."

And Michigan Dems despised Bush. We all went out and voted McCain to spite Bush. McCain won Michigan in 2000 if you can recall.

I see the same thing happening in Iowa.

Plus, a few of my Republican friends have already brought the whole scenario up and laughed at me. That's who they want as a candidate to face.

Just saying.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. lol spare us the melodramatics. And sorry, the Republicans want Hillary for our nominee
because there's no chance she can win the GE with such high negatives and little independent/moerate support. Get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Actually, I agree with you.
Mr Melodramtic-man.

Jumping to conclusions is all you can!


I don't think either Obama or Hillary can win a General Election. Not that I don't want either to. I do.

the end.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. And you know, some Republicans aren't to happy with the republicans right now
so, OMG!, they are deciding to vote for Obama. My father is a Republican and is seriously considering him. So yes, some republicans probably do want him in the white house. If that upsets you...that's your problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. ...And Stuff!
snook'ems!

Tee,hee!






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. um now you're just making yourself look ridiculous.
if you're ok with that, that's all that matter I guess....:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. "That's all that matter"
Edited on Tue Jan-01-08 02:30 AM by BeatleBoot
yep.

"that's all that matter".

;-)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. That's two failed attempts at a coherent post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
24. Well, thank you!
and byte me.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Yeah we are so fucked as a party if we can attract independents and crossovers....
Wouldn't it be so much better if we didn't do that and just attracted the ones who voted with us when we lost? SARC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Read post 17



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC