Second choicers broke heavily for Edwards, Obama just had too much turnout
Herman Munster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-04-08 12:48 AM
Original message
Second choicers broke heavily for Edwards, Obama just had too much turnout
saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-04-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
DadOf2LittleAngels
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-04-08 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
They are basically claiming Hill really finished 2nd what they are ignoring (and wiat I love about the caucus) is that people who dont like her hate her! I could vote for Obama or Edwards but not Hill..
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-04-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
When they are voting for a Democrat, we can't have too much.
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-04-08 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Too much was perfect, finally. nt
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-04-08 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. You mean, he actually won it based on his appeal!
frazzled
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-04-08 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. Nowhere else does second-choice matter--turnout is everything
Now, I don't know if this Obama machine can get similar turnout results in other states, but if it does, jeebus.
Capn Sunshine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-04-08 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. well, that's been the plan all along.
Most of us DO know how to win in this organization......
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-04-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Too much? Hardly. Great to see Obama bringing in more voters!
City Lights
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-04-08 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. Are you trying to say too much turnout is a bad thing? eom
LordJFT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-04-08 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. damn him, causing high voter turnout is a cheap political trick!
Herman Munster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-04-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I'm just saying the facts
Edwards own people said he needed turnout of 135,000 to 140,000 to win.
mhatrw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-04-08 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. Young, first time caucusers were STRONGLY for Obama. n/t
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-04-08 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. obama and edwards won everyone but those over 65......
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Thu May 16th 2024, 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.