Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Any Edwards supporters here explain why Edwards didn't congratulate Obama on his Iowa win?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:20 PM
Original message
Any Edwards supporters here explain why Edwards didn't congratulate Obama on his Iowa win?
Last night did I miss it? Maybe I'm wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Edwards did congratulate Obama.
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 12:24 PM by AndyA
Chapel Hill, North Carolina – Senator Edwards released the following statement after calling Senator Obama to personally congratulate him on his victory in the Iowa caucuses:

"Earlier tonight, I called Senator Obama to congratulate him on his victory in the Iowa caucuses. Tonight's results shows how clearly the American people are sick of the status quo and ready for a president who will fight for the bold change America needs.

"I would also like to extend my best wishes to Senators Biden and Dodd and thank them for their service to our country. They ran impressive campaigns focused on the real issues that matter most to hard-working families, and I have faith that they will continue to work to build the better America we all believe in."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Releasing a statement is not the same as congratulating him in his speech right after he lost to him
Very poor form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. this would be exactly the sort of picky-assed crap
that turns me off to Obama every time I try to warm to him. It seems you have to hold your nose and ignore his supporters in order to form an opinion of the man himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Same here, frogcycle. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Please. What SHOULD turn you off is Edwards' ungracious move ov NOT congratulating him in his
speech like Hillary did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. don't tell me what should turn me off
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 12:47 PM by frogcycle
I am in no mood for ANYONE to tell me how I SHOULD fucking feel

get off your fucking high horse and focus on some fucking legitimate fucking issues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Did you wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning?
:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. No thanks.
Cheer up. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. i agree -- Obama supporters can be like that sometimes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
48. I'm right there with you
Any goodwill that Obama is able to build on his own accord is instantly snuffed out by his more rabid supporters.

In Obama-land, if Edwards had congratulated Obama for winning in his speech, it still wouldn't have been "enough" according to this supporters. A marching band, song by Amy Winehouse, and anecdotes by Mary Matlin would have been more appropriate to mark the glorious ocassion of the win.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #48
76. Regardless, it was an oversight on Edwards part. Congratulating the winner is always de rigeur
after a primary (or caucus) vote. I love John Edwards so I prefer to think that he just overlooked it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #76
78. Overlook it?
Never - Edwards is just craven and selfish, and his hair told him not to congratulate Obama. /sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #78
81. Hey, it's not in my etiquette book what he did. But I can see how lack of sleep
could factor into his lapse. It happens...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoveRage Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
53. Hey, we're excited, give us the pleasure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
57. You know the democrats do the same thing, but republicans fall in line when told who to vote for
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Releasing a statement saying that he "called" Obama...
...to congratulate him isn't enough? Would you like him to post the call on YouTube or something for your own personal
reassurance? I don't mean to sound snotty, but releasing a statement saying that he called Obama and congratulated him is good enough for me, and probably should be for anyone else. He also gave props to Biden and Dodd, which he didn't have to do. That not classy enough for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. No, it's not. He should've said "congratulations to Obama on his win" during that speech
like Hillary was smart enough to do during hers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. A public admission of defeat is being demanded.
I agree that it seems ungracious not to have spared three seconds in a congratulatory salute, but good lord, why belabor the point? Obama's supporters can have their (well-deserved) end-zone wiggle without it.

If we're reading the tea leaves for character indications, voting records count for much, much more--or should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. you miss the point
this is really a game of pin the tail on the donkey

don't you understand what is really important?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. "It is not enough that I win...my enemies must lose."
B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. Edwards is a fighter.
Obama does not need Edwards' to congratulate Obama publicly. Edwards was talking to the press and to his own campaign workers. It is enough if he congratulated Obama in private. We do not know what was said in the privacy of their conversation. If Edwards did not feel like congratulating Obama, that is fine with me. They are both good candidates. Obama won the Iowa caucus not the candidacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
37. He called him up and personally congratulated him.
You are trying to make something out of nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. He should've done it publicly...to look gracious or to at least aknowledge the win.
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 02:01 PM by jenmito
Hillary did it and looked like the bigger person for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. You are nitpicking. Gracious is when you win and don't gripe
about the conduct of people you beat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. No I'm not. It seems like common courtesy. Every other candidate who didn't win congratulated the
winner, regardless of party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. I don't think you'd be satisfied with that, frankly.
You'd find something wrong with his tone of voice, or his eye contact or some other crap. Edwards called Obama up and congratulated him at the first opportunity he had, and he wasn't even "required" to do that. This primary race has gotten ugly and ugly things have been done and said by all three leading campaigns about each other. I don't think as people they are even obliged to be polite to each other at this point.

This politics, not debate class. It's gonna get worse, not better. Get used to it and grow a thicker skin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. Yes I would. I can't stand Hillary but she was good to congratulate Obama in her speech.
Edwards didn't. He was too busy crowing about beating Hillary by 1% after campaigning in IA for YEARS. Edwards should stop the "angry man" act already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #51
73. If you aren't angry, you arent' paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #44
80. you like common courtesy? yet you are here acting like a fishwife?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
40. He called him on the phone personally and congratulated him.
That's about as good as it gets.

What do you expect, a free shoe shine? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. No. Like I said,
He should've done it publicly...to look gracious or to at least aknowledge the win.
Hillary did it and looked like the bigger person for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. You really need to focus on what's important, and this isn't it.
You might ask how Obama is going to repay all those lobbyists who've donated money to his campaign. They're going to want something for all that money, and Obama is going to be in a compromising position when they call in their favor.

We need real change in America, not more of the same. Hillary and Barack represent more of the same. They owe lobbyists and big corporations BIG TIME. How are they going to fix the problems, largely due to those corporations, when they owe them so much?

You're wasting your time and everyone else's with this pitiful attempt to make someone look bad. Edwards called Obama personally first chance he got, which means a heck of a lot more than one line in a speech.

Get over it and move on to something IMPORTANT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Obama doesn't accept money from lobbyists.
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 02:22 PM by jenmito
Get your information straight. And as you should know, Edwards was not going to accept matching funds until he couldn't raise as much as he had hoped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Ugh. Don't be so naive:
Obama’s Refusal of Lobbyists’ Money Has its Limits

by Dan Morain

WASHINGTON - While pledging to turn down donations from lobbyists themselves, Sen. Barack Obama raised more than $1 million in the first three months of his presidential campaign from law firms and companies that have major lobbying operations in the nation’s capital.Portraying himself as a new-style politician determined to reform Washington, Obama makes his policy clear in fundraising invitations, stating that he takes no donations from “federal lobbyists.” His aides announced last week he was returning $43,000 to lobbyists who donated to his campaign.

But the Illinois Democrat’s policy of shunning money from lobbyists registered to do business on Capitol Hill does not extend to lawyers whose partners lobby there...

(It also doesn't include the spouses of lobbyists, etc, etc. In short, it's a show policy.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. Edwards did the same thing AND was involved in a hedge fund...
Edwards is a hypocrite who gave lobbyists' money back when he was caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #47
55. Obama doesn't need money from corporate lobbyists, he has them working his campaign instead
Obama, Cozy with Corporate Lobbyists, Risks Much with Edwards Attack

By Christine Escobar, HuffingtonPost.com. Posted December 31, 2007.

http://www.alternet.org/election08/72079/

I still haven't figured out what people do when they chose their candidate but it sure looks like they have very facts in hand when they do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #55
74. No kidding.
Accepting a candidate's representations at face value is a bit absurd. I fully expect that both Edwards and Obama have lobbyists supporting them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #47
77. Data contrast with his theme - PACs and lobbyists aided Obama's rise
By Scott Helman, Globe Staff
Using campaign appearances, e-mails to supporters, and Iowa TV ads, Illinois Senator Barack Obama has repeatedly reminded voters that his presidential campaign does not accept contributions from lobbyists or political action committees, casting his decision as a noble departure from the ways of Washington.
He hit the theme hard again in Tuesday's Democratic debate in Chicago as he sought to capitalize on rival Hillary Clinton's remark last weekend that taking lobbyists' cash is acceptable because they "represent real Americans."
"The people in this stadium need to know who we're going to fight for," Obama said at Soldier Field. "The reason that I'm running for president is because of you, not because of folks who are writing big checks, and that's a clear message that has to be sent, I think, by every candidate."
But behind Obama's campaign rhetoric about taking on special interests lies a more complicated truth. A Globe review of Obama's campaign finance records shows that he collected hundreds of thousands of dollars from lobbyists and PACs as a state legislator in Illinois, a US senator, and a presidential aspirant.
In Obama's eight years in the Illinois Senate, from 1996 to 2004, almost two-thirds of the money he raised for his campaigns -- $296,000 of $461,000 -- came from PACs, corporate contributions, or unions, according to Illinois Board of Elections records. He tapped financial services firms, real estate developers, healthcare providers, oil companies, and many other corporate interests, the records show.

http://jjb.yuku.com/topic/213794
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
59. Are you trying to say Edwards isn't gracious.. oh my some would call that funny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. What he did by not congratulating Obama was an ungracious act. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
68. He said he called him.
That's speaking to him directly. That's enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
79. Bullshit. It is how it is done.
Take the fucking win and stfu.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. That's a nice statement, thanks nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. delete
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 12:57 PM by cat_girl25
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. delete
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 12:57 PM by cat_girl25
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. That's it??
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 03:11 PM by indimuse
Sounds like a smack in the face ..... Hillary's! :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. You missed it. He did.
Chapel Hill, North Carolina – Senator Edwards released the following statement after calling Senator Obama to personally congratulate him on his victory in the Iowa caucuses:

"Earlier tonight, I called Senator Obama to congratulate him on his victory in the Iowa caucuses. Tonight's results shows how clearly the American people are sick of the status quo and ready for a president who will fight for the bold change America needs.

"I would also like to extend my best wishes to Senators Biden and Dodd and thank them for their service to our country. They ran impressive campaigns focused on the real issues that matter most to hard-working families, and I have faith that they will continue to work to build the better America we all believe in."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
61. What sore winners! You're gonna need our support so it's best
to kiss up to us Edwards supporters now than try to bring us in to the fold later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because he's eeeeeevil!!!
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 12:26 PM by Moochy
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Did Obama congratulate Edwards on his second place finish?
Give me a break. Sore winners are not cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. That's not how it works. You don't congratulate someone for losing to them. You SHOULD
congratulate your opponent for beating them, though. Unclassy move on his part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
72. How Old Are You??? Just Asking, This Seems To Be Kind Of Like
Nana, Nana, Boo, Boo! I guess Edwards supporters show write him and tell him to send an "engraved apology" for NOT congratulating him the way YOU seem to think he should.

I believe Edwards called Musharaf about Bhutto too when others made public statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misskittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Because he hadn't slept for 36 hours?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Anybody wonder why this has been posted and answered 50 times already?
Did I count wrong? Was it a hundred times?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. No need to wonder
Some of the Obama supporters are extremely pissy today for some reason. Maybe they stayed up too late last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. all together now, DU:
one,


two,


three,


Stick it where the sun don't shine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. Just to piss you off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. Because he focused on the issues
which is what he should be focused on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
24. because he was too busy calling hil the status quo and gloating that she "lost."
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 12:56 PM by annie1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I think you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. yes, he was concentrating on the real competition
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. He's in good company
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThePhilosopher04 Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
34. No reason why he should...
No one congratulates the winner in the first stage of the Tour De France.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
35. Its called Sour Grapes
Its one of the reasons people don't get excited about Edwards. He's a phony. I live here in NC, And you wouldn't know he was from here. There is so little excitement for him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #35
54. You ever been injured in a car wreck and had to sue the guy that hit you?
Then you'll want a plaintiff's lawyer, which is what Edwards did for decades. He earned that money by working damned hard.

He is the only candidate other than Kucinich talking in DETAIL about pocketbook issues and the economy and jobs and such. Nobody else is talking about it. Everybody else is taking lobbyists' money and pretending the economy is great for the rest of us because they and the politician/pundit class is making lots of money.

I don't think Edwards is phony. I think he's got conviction. I don't think he could have fought big companies on behalf of grievously injured and dead people for years unless he had that fire in his belly and that conviction that he is doing the right thing.

You don't know much about the legal profession, do you?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #35
64. It was pretty classless of both Edwards and his wife
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 03:54 PM by zulchzulu
If you're a decent, respectful person, you congratulate the winner in the race. Yeah, I know, it's a couple fucking words you have to utter....but, if you don't, in 99% of cases, you're an ass. Anyone with a half a goddamn soul would at least congratulate the winner. Neither Edwards or his wife had the courage to admit they lost.

Maybe he'll apologize later for his mistake. :eyes:

Hillary did. Wow, was that ever hard... :shrug:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #64
69. ...
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #64
71. He did.
It was the Iowa Caucus, not the November election. In any case, he DID congratulate him. This is beyond petty and annoying, your candidate won the caucus, can't you( Obama supporters) be happy for a few minutes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
36. You missed it. I believe Edwards said he called Obama.
Chapel Hill, North Carolina – Senator Edwards released the following statement after calling Senator Obama to personally congratulate him on his victory in the Iowa caucuses:

"Earlier tonight, I called Senator Obama to congratulate him on his victory in the Iowa caucuses. Tonight's results shows how clearly the American people are sick of the status quo and ready for a president who will fight for the bold change America needs.

"I would also like to extend my best wishes to Senators Biden and Dodd and thank them for their service to our country. They ran impressive campaigns focused on the real issues that matter most to hard-working families, and I have faith that they will continue to work to build the better America we all believe in."

http://www.johnedwards.com/news/press-releases/20080104-edwards-congratulates/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #36
66. Yeah... after his handlers brought it to his attention that he didn't concede gracefully
That "released" statement was obviously damage control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
49. Talk about being a sore winner!
Geez. Get a grip.

It's great that your candidate won - why worry about rubbing the face of others in it? It's unbecoming, and would make me think that I'm responding to a troll if most Obama supporters weren't so nit picky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. You couldn't be more wrong. I don't really have a candidate right now.
But Edwards is my first choice if I had to choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejanocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
58. Any Obama supporters here explain why Obama left the cap off the toothpaste last night?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #58
62. Or left the toilet seat up?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
63. He did, though not in the speech
He released a statement and called Obama. That's fine to me. No need to nitpick over something like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
navarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
65. Geez....
I got nothing against Obama, I'd gladly vote for him if it came to that, but....

I think maybe we ought to take up a collection to buy jenmito a tall glass of STFU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
67. Wow, talk about sore winners!
Jeez. Your candidate won, and deservedly so, and you want to carp about someone who didn't publicly genuflect? Wow. Just wow.

BTW, sincere congratulations to Obama for his victory, from an Edwards supporter. Not what the OP demanded, but hey, best I can do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
70. Thanks for making such a valuable contribution
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 04:44 PM by Moochy
to DU. You brighten everyone's life with your joyful postings!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
75. he felt the need to use a National Podium to underscore the plight of the poor
and the need for Universal healthcare?

Just a wild guess.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #75
82. Given the sobering economic indicators released today ...
...(coincidence?) ... that kind of talk about the plight of the poor is going to be reaching a lot more folks as they become "the poor".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC