Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

As a Hillary supporter..I am actually glad she lost Iowa: Here's why

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:22 PM
Original message
As a Hillary supporter..I am actually glad she lost Iowa: Here's why
1. Finally..the media will let go of this inevitability meme that has been the CW.
2. She has to fight harder..if she can come back, she gets the nomination..if she can't, she doesn't deserve to win.
3. Obama will now get the "front runner" treatment, which means closer scrutiny.
4. Edwards will now turn his attention to Obama..if he thinks he can win NH over Hillarys corpse, he is sadly mistaken. My personal opinion is that Edward relentless attacks on Hillary were one of the factors in her defeat. Will Obama be able to handle this? Who knows..we will see.
You will note..that I have gone out of my way not to attack anyone in this topic..
save the empty slogans and attacks for another thread and try to comment with substance..
I think Hillary will rise to the occasion..if she can't she does not deserve my support..
we will see..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Be glad for one reason.
No dem since Carter won Iowa and went on to win the GE.

It's kind of a curse.

Anyway, you are right, now you will see what she is made of. If she can't beat a rookie, she isn't ready for the finals, anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. But that doesn't really say much. There's only been one Dem. since Carter who won the GE...
regardless of a previous win in Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobRossi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Doh!
That is going to leave a mark!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. And the rest won Iowa
You missed the point entirely.

Clinton was the only nominee who lost Iowa. He won the GE.

Doh!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama won't get the "front runner" treatment of closer scrutiny by media because Media wants O - not
Hill or Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. yes, I think there is a lot of truth in your statement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. I completely agree.
The words used to describe Obama compared to those used to describe Hillary or Edwards makes that pretty clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. If all that happens,
then I'll be happy too. lol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think she wil give it her best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adarling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. agreed
I am a Hillary supporter, especially after the debates. Obama just hasn't blown me away yet like everyone else. I am keeping my options open, but i lean strongly on Hillary. I just don't want another republican touching the oval office. the stench in there after Bush leaves will be be so bad, its going to be hard for either one of them when they enter office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. I like the zeal...but I would rather have had her win...
She is a fighter and a leader...so if anyone can come back she can...but it is gonna be tough!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. me too.----would rather have had the wn right up front
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. In many ways, I agree
to a lot of people, I think she comes across as kind of arrogant, and the front-runner status onrly reinforced that image. Now that she's the underdog, people might consider her differently. Also, yes, Obama needs to undergo closer scrutiny, though I don't know if there's enough time between now and NH for that to happen adequately. Either way, as a Hillary supporter, I'm very optimistic about NH and the primaries in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hillary has an uphill climb - especially with younger voters
she is the poster lady for the Clinton dynasty - the people are sick of dynasties and religion (so Huck has no hope in "hell" to get elected)and she voted for Iraq-she should have never done that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Please explain "dynasty" and try not to lie.
One Clinton not a blood relation has held the presidency. Hillary is the man's wife, not his sister. She has one child, a daughter, who has shown no interest in politics for her own life (and who could blame her).

So this "dynasty" consists of a woman running for the same job her husband once held. A WOMAN. Running for a MAN's job. Which the misuse of the word "dynasty" obscures. Which is the goal.

It's a very successful meme. I hear it here twenty times a minute and now Robert Parry has disgraced himself with it.

Please tell me how this is different in any way from the "invented the internet" slander against Gore?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. I mean 'political' dynasty in the sense that the Clintons
were in office for a long time (she was a very active First Lady-I happen to like that) as a team, the Clintons, especially Bill, have been associated with Poppy Bush and George in a more friendly manner than might be expected from Bill and Hillary-- both families have occupied the the WH for long stretches, people want big change-certainly younger voters do. So, as you can see, my take on dynasty is not technical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. and pls don't be calling me a liar...thanks :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. Where was all this "Dynasty" talk when Smirk was running?
The "Dynasty" dig is just another piece of right-wing spin -- a way to attack Hillary. And, mark you, the same people who now view a Clinton "dynasty" with alarm, had not one word of warning to say when George W., the first-born son of the previous President, who was also President and CIA Director, and who was himself the son of a powerful U.S. Senator, was running.

Don't do the right-wing's work for them. Stop this Limbaugh-like "We-don't-want-a-dynasty" spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hey, when life gives you lemons
...make lemonade!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. I think she would disagree and point to all the reasons that a win for her in Iowa would have
spelled trouble for her opponents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. All good points, but...
1. Does loss of this "inevitability" help her or hurt her? It could be a little of each. After all, there's probably a fairly large group of people who didn't think Obama could win, but who are now questioning that. Loss of the inevitability factor could cut both ways.

2. Totally agree. I expect Hillary to come out of the gates swinging. She has to, and she's foolish if she doesn't.

3. New Hampshire's only four days away, and the other primaries follow swiftly after. I don't know if there's time to give Obama closer scrutiny than he's already gotten -- deep digging requires weeks or even months of effort.

4. Even if Edwards attacks Obama, he'll still probably come in third in NH. After that, he's out, and Edwards is no longer a factor in South Carolina, which will be a major battleground.

Anyway, point being, Iowa definitely made it harder for Hillary to win, not easier. But you'd have to be an idiot to count her out. She can still pull off a NH win nicely. One big question -- what happens after Edwards drops? Do his supporters go for Obama or Hillary? I know Edwards supports don't want to hear this, but he put a ton of time and effort into Iowa, without the ground support or cash that Obama and Hillary have. I don't think he's long for the race. When he drops out, and where his would-be supporters go, could be a deciding factor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. If Edwards drops out, even if he suggest
that I go Obama I will go Hillary. Didn't like the loop hole ridden NAFTA and a few other things that Bill left us with and I think she may be able to see now (after the fact) how NAFTA only hurt the american worker. She will be my candidate if JRE drops out, but not until.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. Kennedy, enjoyed your reasons and maybe you will not be
called a racist by obama folks because you said he will come under more scrutiny...WOW! such a racist comment! NOT

I will support HRC till the last dog dies...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
19. The look on Bill Clinton & Madeleine Albright's faces was a look of defeat
though Hillary didn't seem too upset by the results.
I don't think she needs to win New Hampshire, just has to be close.
I like Edwards, but I think HRC will rise to the occassion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. I didn't see a look of defeat, just support for HIll. Of course, they were disappointed.
I didn't expect the wonderful speech that Hill gave. It was grand, and made me very proud and determined that I will swing some voters her way. I hope she prevails. I do believe she is the best candidate for the job. As icing on the cake, it is time for the US to have a female president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. Heck, she might actually have to promise to end the war again.
The close race brought us an eleventh-hour pledge from Edwards. I, for one, am looking forward to seeing the Big Three forced to address real issues. Clinton, finally, is going to have to work for that nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
21. Agree with most of it
Hillary now has to really fight to win and this is good for her to show she can comeback to win. She willl be a stronger candidate if she can overcome this setback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
23. You might be on to something.
The Clintons always do best when they're the underdog. IA is always blown out of proportion, but when the dust finally settles, the nominee is usually someone other than the one chosen in that state.

Either way, I will fight for her in NJ until the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
29. I think this is what people call "spin."
I have a much more down to earth name for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. you sure you want to be such an ass?
you're guy hasn't actually won yet..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Right, right.
I should be sad when he wins and happy if he loses.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
30. Obama handled the "front runner" treatment just fine a few weeks ago.
He got knocked down for a few days and then came right back.

He'll do just fine as "front runner".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
33. BTW - Bill Clinton lost Iowa too
Just saying!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Iowa is weird. (The caucuses, not the state.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC