|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
penguin7 (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:10 PM Original message |
Wasn't Edwards Supposed to Win Iowa? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tired_old_fireman (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. Who is going to have that discussion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
2. He sure did beat The Clintons/DLC and corporate media expectations though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
penguin7 (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Didn't Edwards travel to every county in the state? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. All I know is he beat the "inevitable" Mega-media Stars, the Clintons. That's big. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
27. I like Kucinich, really I do. But you are saying Edwards should drop... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
32. So, Edwards should drop out for not being viable, but Kuchinich should stay in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
3. So second-place Edwards should Drop Out? That's absurd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Absolutely absurd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
penguin7 (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. How is Edwards viable if Iowa was his best chance at a win early? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
24. W/O the independent voters, Obama and Edwards basically tied. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 02:02 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. W/O the independent voters, Obama beat Edwards and so did Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. My mistake if those numbers are accurate -- I have never heard of "ENTRANCE" polls before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #9 |
31. He's viable because he can win in a general election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
4. If that's the way you feel, why (for the same reason) doesn't Hillary just drop out now too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Edwards has been campaigning in Iowa for years-never left after the '04 election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slick8790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
6. He placed above someone who's raised over 100 million dollars. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PVnRT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
8. Wasn't Clinton Supposed to Win Iowa? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
penguin7 (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:19 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Clinton is not perturbing the discussion on the war and health care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slick8790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:23 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. She isn't? Since when? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
penguin7 (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Clinton is not the anti-war single payer pretender |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Thats some damn fine crack you are smoking! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. Perturbing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:29 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. The OP is Hoisted by his own Perturb! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
penguin7 (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:30 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Edwards has no credibility on the war in Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. If Penguin7 says it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
10. He has no reason to drop out now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy823 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
13. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
penguin7 (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
16. There is now no reason to support Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Said the Fucking Shill to himself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peregrine Took (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:37 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. Tee hee - good one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #16 |
30. So him placing 2nd settles the "electable" issue? POP QUIZ: Where did the last two Dem presidents... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MzNov (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 05:02 PM Response to Reply #16 |
36. WRONG again! Now there is even MORE reason to support Edwards! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
19. Three is a Good Number--To Expect Only One Is Absurd So Early |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
28. I sure thought he would. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
29. You should consult with Lovelace the Guru ... he'll set you straight ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moloch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
34. Edwards ego... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 05:17 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. If Huckabee wins the GOP nom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 05:19 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. if Edwards had an ego, he would still be the best Trial Lawyer in North Carolina |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
38. you're taking a lot of crap on this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-04-08 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
39. Honest discussion on Universal Healthcare between |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC