Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Great quote from Charles Pierce on Obama's 'message'.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:41 PM
Original message
Great quote from Charles Pierce on Obama's 'message'.
http://mediamatters.org/altercation/index

"As to Obama, well, I'm still waiting. He gives a good speech and he plainly can get people off the parliamentary side of their arse. However, after seven years of God Told Me To Screw This Up, and people telling me that it's the president's job to "protect" me and my family -- Give me a break. I wouldn't hire the incumbent to park my car -- I am very wary of messianic appeals to the better angels of my nature. I don't want reconciliation with this party full of vandals until we have truth first. Does the current frontrunner have an opinion on what should happen to the people who stonewalled the 9/11 commission? Is that something we have to "get beyond" so as to march together into bipartisan Shangri-La? Well, f**k that. How's the damage get repaired that way? If it's OK, I'm not kneeling at the grotto just yet."


Kind of says what I feel about Obama just now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, let's pass on the potatoes and get to the meat of matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Me too. You wont find me at the altar of Obama either, now or later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. kind of says what I feel...
about our democratic controlled Congress. I have no bitch about speaking the truth...but I do find it a little disingenuous to blame the Senator from Illinois for the state of our democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wouldn't hire the incumbent to park my car
:rofl:

JESUS, this guy is funny--they should give him his own column, and maybe make him a talking head on tee vee if he doesn't scare the children with a freaky face or whatnot!!! The paragraphs that precede are pretty brilliant:

    Well, early on in the evening, Chris Matthews used the word "pissant" on live television. (Another barrier falls!) While I did slide nerdfully over to C-SPAN to watch some actual caucuses, I kept coming back to MSNBC and the evening zoo crew. Whatever points they accrue for giving some PT to the great Dr. Maddow, they lose for not bundling Matthews off to the Happy Farm very early on, before he started babbling about the revelatory moment of good ol' Ioway's signing up with a transformational "Third World" figure wha-dee-doo-dah while poor Olbermann sat there groping blindly for the Thorazine. By the end, after Barack Obama's latest oratorical candy floss, Matthews looked like he'd caught the whole dinner show at Lourdes. Can we please have one election where we are not told it's our obligation as citizens to swoon over someone? Can't we just, you know, HIRE someone to do the job?

    (Editorial note: :rofl: :rofl: )

    That said, it was a good night to be a Democrat and a very, very bad night to be a Romney. How'd you like to spend seven million on TV ads, lose to a Bible-banger with a name out of Al Capp, and then see John McCain on your teevee, already in New Hampshire and taking further bites out of your hide? How do the R's square this circle? Romney's a self-evident fake, and the establishment plainly wants to sell the Huck down the river. How does it do that without fomenting a Wall Street/Wal-Mart split that will take a generation to heal? I think they suck it up and run St. John on his latest platform of keeping American troops in Iraq for 100 years. Have fun, kids.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Mitt does look to be dying a painful (and much deserved) death out there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is the key point we need to be pressing him on: prosecution of BFEE criminals
If he plans to forgive and forget then he's not qualified to be president, IMHO.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. For a minute, I thought you meant THIS Charles Pierce (who I used to see
when he performed in San Francisco):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Pierce




But he passed away a few years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cornus Donating Member (720 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. That's what I thought too!
I also saw him in SF back in 1968...fun times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. Charles Pierce? Don't know him, but I remember Hil claiming credit for Media Matters creation in
a forum last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Charles Pierce seems to be someone who wrote to the site. A commenter. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. This "Kill 'em All" attitude held by the far left was rejected last night.
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 04:03 PM by Bleachers7
I'm not saying anything about falling in line, but the people pushing the "kill 'em all" BS like Pierce were rejected in both parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Sorry, but what 'kill 'em all' attitude do you see in what he wrote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. "Is that something we have to "get beyond" so as to march together into bipartisan Shangri-La?"
"Is that something we have to "get beyond" so as to march together into bipartisan Shangri-La? Well, f**k that."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. So you want to forgive all crimes and injustices done for the last 7 years in the name of
bipartisanship? I still don't see how that equates to a 'kill 'em all' attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. No, not at all.
That's the closest example of this in Pierce's comments. Look around DU and you'll see far more of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. OK, I give up. I have no idea what you're talking about with the kill 'em all statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. This example is weak.
I'll bring it up again when I can support it better. What I'm saying is that there are people that don't want to "come together" or "end the division." Those people lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yep...I think it's unfortunate that
the under-30 crowd in Iowa are so easily swayed by good speeches. And btw, I don't Oprah would have endorsed Obama if he didn't live in Illinois.

I don't trust him....and as Michael Moore said, the Corporations would eat him for breakfast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I love Michael Moore as a filmmaker, but he doesn't have a good track record
on picking candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. But he certainly has a
good mind when it comes to judgment of character. Obama has never worked in the corporate world...non-profit, academia, government...but never the corporate arena. I, too, believe the Corporate sharks will eat him for breakfast. One can't afford to be just 'present' when dealing with these dog eat dog types.

And I don't see the Red States any more inclined to vote for a black man than they would for a white woman. The Repugnants are licking their chops at running against either of them.

I know Michael regrets supporting Nader in '00...he never thought that Nader wouldn't put his support behind Gore as the election approached...but that's all history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Under 30 crowd - you are mistaken
As you can see

Age

(22%) 17-29 - Obama 57% (Edwards 14%; Clinton 11%)
(18%) 30-44 - Obama 42% (Clinton 23%; Edwards 21%)
(38%) 45-64 - Edwards 31% (Clinton 28%; Obama 27%)


http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/#val=IADEM

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. What I see is that over
half (57%) of those under 30 voted for Obama....so how am I mistaken? Is Mercury retrograde or something? Am I speaking French?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Forget it
What you are speaking is bullshit. You're interested in pretending Obama only attracted the youth vote. Feh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. You are gladly and completely forgotten.....
you must not have passed Algebra I...or maybe the class before that...the one that deals with percentages.

And I bet you're under 30 and are charmed by charismatic speeches and want everyone to be nice and sing songs around the campfire with religious wingnuts who have finally seen the light and want to adopt all of the unwanted foster children in the world.

You're the one who is bullshit. Go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. A good speech doesn't equal a good leader.
Words. Just words. Gimme some substance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. You said it! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. has clinton or edwards said what they'd do re: 911 stonewalling?
just curious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. I had the same question while reading this thread
I don't remember either of them bringing it up either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yep, he just about summed it up!!!
I also loved what he said about Tweety!!!!! LOL!!!!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
24. It's how I feel about Obama too. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
28. Talk about missing the point.
Does this guy really think Bush is "the people" that Obama wants to unite with? I guess some people will never get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
29. Amen to the first post - like the republicans are suddenly going to
play nice after De Lay and Rove and Newt have shown them how to be the worst sunuvabeechs this side of the universe....they rubberstamped everything Cheney and Bush wanted....and they're suddenly going to change? I think not...I think
if ever Obama gets in there he'll be one of them....a middle of the roader not so different from Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
31. Hear, hear.
The "Democrats are wimps" meme has got to go. It's time for us to fight for the Constitution of the United States. If we're too weak to fight Republicans, why should the American people trust us to fight terrorists?

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC