Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 09:57 AM
Original message
Edwards
I do like the fact that Edwards is getting a message out that I haven't heard, in my lifetime (51 years), and that he doesn't accept corporate PAC money, and the fact that he is out spent 6 to 1 in Iowa yet finishes 2nd.
Yes, he has flaws...and we could go after him however, the message is refreshing. I just don't know if he can overcome the big corporate money politics that run our country.

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. He didn't take PAC money in 1998...didn't stop him from voting for China Trade...
Yucca Mountain, IWR, first Bankruptcy bill and the Patriot Act...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I won't take the obvious path here and post all of Hillary's "bad" votes.
But she has a slew of them.

Including that nasty one regarding Iran, which some believe opened the door to Bush going to war with them...

At least Edwards has admitted he's made mistakes, and is taking steps to correct them. Where's Hillary's admission of a mistake?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Avoiding the point...which is Edwards hypocrisy...
I didn't say these were all bad votes...I am saying it is these votes which his refusal of PAC money progressives expected not to occur...and which he now apologizes for ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't see the hypocrisy in that.
He made mistakes, he's admitted it and he's taking action to try to correct those mistakes.

I haven't met a human yet who hasn't made mistakes.

I don't agree with Edwards 100%, but I do believe he's in the best position to make the changes we need in America today. And one of them is having a President who can admit when he's wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Rose Colored glasses...
If it was one issue perhaps...and if he hadn't pulled this before perhaps...

On issue after issue he has flip flopped...yet given his track record...he will do it again...

He claims he is an agent of change and he is the one who can do it...yet his record says the exact opposite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You call it hypocrisy, I call it evolution and enlightenment. If no one person
ever evolved from an idea or stance, no human progress would ever have been made to date. I probably said and did some things years ago that I regret, but as I grow and EVOLVE, I would hardly call myself a hypocrite for doing so.

Disingenuous argument, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Blinders...
Edwards has a track record of not living up to his rhetoric...and there is nothing in his background that indicates he has the skills necessary to effectuate any change...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. You're kidding me
Clinton voted for the IWR and the Patriot Act as well! How nakedly hypocritical can you get??

http://www.buzzflash.com/analysis/03/01/14_Edwards.html

Edwards was a more liberal senator than Clinton, even though she represents me from the blue state of New York. And I use the term "represent" loosely. It's more like "take advantage of a large blue state and use it as a platform to run for president."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Hillary isn't disavowing her past...Edwards is...
It is amazing how Edwards rank hypocrisy...his constant flip flopping...and the fact that he has pulled this pseudo populist schtick before is completely ignored by his supporters...

At least Hillary has the guts to stand by her record...a very good one with significant accomplishment..unlike Edwards...who os constantly apologizing for the one time he was in public office...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abburdlen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. He's done a tremendous job
bringing important issues to the discussion. He's put a spotlight on the abuses of corporations.
but whether call it an evolution or flip-flopping, the fact that his history doesn't match the speeches is an issue.

The article in today's Boston Globe highlights the issue fairly clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC