Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What States Do You See Obama NOT Winning In, As In "No Way In Hell"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
fightindonkey Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:05 AM
Original message
What States Do You See Obama NOT Winning In, As In "No Way In Hell"?
Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Entire South With The Exception Of FL and VA But That's True Of Any Democrat
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Are you serious? You have to be joking. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. Texas, Alabama, North Carolina, And Mississippi Haven't Went Democratic Since 1976
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 11:14 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
Florida has went Democratic once since 1976...

Georgia has went Democratic once since 1976...

Louisiana, Arkansas, and Tennessee have went Democratic twice since 1976 with two southerners on the ticket...

Al Gore, a southerner lost every southern state except Florida*...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. But yet I think he can win Virginia, and that has gone democratic once since 1952
and that was in the 64 democratic landslide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. I Said VA And FL Are In Play
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Sorry, didnt see that was you
I dont think Florida is in play though, especially with the controversy there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Why?
It's a purple state....

Clinton won it..Gore won it*...Kerry made a credible showing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomreedtoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
57. Why? Florida HAS no primary. Or a Democratic Party.
There is an organization that calls itself the "FLorida Democratic Party," sure. And the Washington Generals were a genuine basketball team that always just happened to lose to the Harlem Globetrotters.

Florida's Democrats are a bunch of good ol' boy layabouts, none of them supporting anything like positions you'd expect from Democrats, and bending over for their masters in the Florida Republican Party. That's why they're attacking Dean, for daring to discipline them for breaking the rules - on Republican order.

Sorry, but Florida does not count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. In the primary or the GE?
He'll be strong in the entire south for the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
53. Yeah, he'll be strong in the primaries across the South, but lose
most of them in the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. Count Florida out, we never get it right! Fl will probably select McCain
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 11:12 AM by demo dutch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
33. It wouldn't be if the party would
1. Drop gun control from the platform

2. Advocate revisiting NAFTA and GATT/ come up with a very solid plan to increase blue collar and farming opportunity

The south was the base for the Democratic party before the party was taken over by the urban intellectual and elite who have completely abandoned the rural blue collar Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaulaFarrell Donating Member (840 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #33
62. That's a misunderstanding
The south was the base for the Dems because the Republicans were the party of Lincoln. All the true elections in the south occurred during the democratic primaries, because the democrats always won the actutal election. So there may have been liberal dems in the south but there were also plenty of conservative ones. That all changed with the civil rights act.

You may be right about those changes increasing the dem vote in the south, but the heydey of the democratic south was based on racism. George Wallace was a democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. None. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. General election or primary?
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 11:12 AM by demnan
In the Primary I think Obama will carry most of the states, unless there is is a native son or daughter involved. I would imagine that New Mexico will go for its governor. I think someone posted about Ohio possibly going for Edwards. I also think New York will probably go to Clinton.

I'm pretty sure Virginia will go to Obama. Our Governor endorsed him about two months ago and there is a lot of support for him here.

In the general election expect the usual nearly 50-50 split. I actually don't see him winning the general election. We lose Arkansas if we choose him over Clinton. But we might lose that to Huckabee anyway. But we may pick up a surprise state in the south, such as Mississippi if the black vote organzes behind him. I really hope that is the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
28. Huckabuck won't draw 20% in AR.,,,, Blacks in Ar. will not vote
for Obama, or at least the majority won't,,,Most Afr/Amer I know don't vote color,,,Hillary will most probably win Ar. Edwards maybe,,IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. Louisiana.
that's about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. There Are Southern States That Haven't Went Democratic Since 1976
Mississipi, Texas, and Alabama come immediately to mind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. Largely due to low Black voter turnout.
Not this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Do You Forget Jesse Jackson's Campaigns To Increase African American Registration?
I'd like to see research that indicates African Americans don't vote in Southern states in proportion to their population...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #20
31. Even without winning
a lot more enormous and costly pressure can be put across the board. We have mostly loss by "big state" strategy that did nothing excpet play defense and provide countless giveaways to the GOP strategy. JFK did not expect to swing the South but the black voter turnout in itself, without having to publicly acknowledge for fear of white backlash, was an important part of the strategy. More important than just winning states. With Edwards or Obama we will show up in the South big time, thanks also to Howard Dean and recent successes. That means too that coattails and a landslide swamping into their stronghold will grow the new prez a big mandate for change and less room for the success of fraud.

Pessimism is only warranted in the event of massive GOP fraud. One way to weaken right from the start it is with Obama or Edwards. As long as Bush is in power and the fraud unchecked, you are well allowed to be pessimistic, but don't restrict the burden on the Dems who could win several red states right now without the GOP and media crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #31
41. Patrick, I respect what you are saying but my friend the gop
slime machine knows full well how to play the game. For every new black person that registers to vote they will register a white, hell maybe two.

I'm reminded of the really old Popeye cartoon where somebody convinced Popeye he'd be better off without his spinach.Popeye threw the can away - it landed on the back of a truck and as the truck pulled away, the spinach can called out to Popeye, "You'll be sorry!" I wanted a knife fighter to go against the Republican Slime Machine, but it seems like the Democrats want a pony called "Change," instead.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #20
39. Looks better than I thought, but still 6% lower turnout.
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 11:30 AM by rucky
Don't know if that's enough to sway an election, but it's safe to assume that Obama or Clinton would increase turnout among Blacks.

http://www.eac.gov/clearinghouse/docs/voter-registration-and-turnout-in-federal-elections-by-race_ethnicity-1972.pdf/attachment_download/file
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. I Agree
But look at the Magette race in Georgia and the Kirk race in TX... They were both African Americans running for the Senate and were unable to change long established voting patterns...

We'll see...

Much is inferred from Obama's great showing in IA but what is ignored is he ran behind Edwards and Clinton in many rural IA districts...


Are rural Iowans surrogates for white southerners?

We shall learn shortly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. In the general? Utah. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. None in the Primary
If he wins in NH and Iowa. Its hard to believe he will lose in the states where there population is more and there is more of a minority vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. Utah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
54. Utah i the only one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. The South... they might vote for Edwards but not Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
12. Michigan
With Obama and Edwards off the ballot, Hillary should win.

I'm voting "uncommitted". "My" uncommitted vote goes to Edwards, though the uncommitted votes will be claimed by whoever gets to the press first.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. Texas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:11 AM
Original message
Primary, or General?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. Texas. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
19. This post baits South-bashing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
21. Texas, Mississippi, that kind of states..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
22. I think he will also have a hard time in
Wisconsin, New York, Mass, Maryland, West Virginia, North Carolina, South Caroline, Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, Kentucky, ESPECIALLY FLORIDA WITH ALL THE ELDERS. You know the ones Obama is slurring and slamming. Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyo. Utah, Oregon, Washington, California, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Arkansas, California damn have I missed any. And I doubt that Oprah will pay to bus all those students back to Iowa because they can't vote in the general election like they did in the caucus.

Oh of course he will take Illinois.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. i wish i could recommend your post
you should make it an OP so we can. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latteromden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. you really think he'll lose BOTH Californias?
man, that's harsh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. BitWit Is Being Bitter
But his supposition is almost as wrong as Obama sweeping the South...

Unless the Republicans nominate a real loser I see a replay of 00 and 04 with a twist...

FL, OH, VA, IA, NM, CO, will be in play and the Dems will win enough to get a EC win...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #32
44. IA and OH, barring some unusual event, will almost certainly go blue.
Both took a swing left in '06, and most accounts indicate that the trend should continue in '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #22
46. Excellent point!
Very insightful, you should make this its own thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
24. ...all of the toothless states for starters...
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. What is a toothless state???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #24
37. Typical elitist attitude which has lost the party it's base
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 11:30 AM by pipoman
truebrit...truetwit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #37
51. Aaah yes, because the South has given us so many great Democratic victories recently...
..you know GA, MO, MS, TN, KS, OK, great bastions of forward thinking liberal intellectuals...

What a base to lose....:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. Since the party has been hijacked by urban intellectuals
who hate rural and blue collar Dems. Why do you think we lost in 2000 and 2004? It wasn't because we lost urban centers it is because Al couldn't carry Tenn. because he abandoned the base in his own state. Keep shitting on rural and blue collar Dems and expect more of the same, or drop some of the elitist positions and pick up those votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. And this is one of the reasons Obama will lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #51
58. All of those states routenely elect Dems
in fact TN, KS, and OK currently have Dem governors, Georgia has its first pug gov. since reconstruction right now. How do you explain that? Could it be that the National Dem party has abandoned the values of rural and blue collar Dems?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #58
65. Naah...must be because they got those Dems to go to a few NECKCAR races...
...YEEHAW!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #24
49. Are you saying he won't get the infant and old people vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. Ed-Zackery!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #49
60. He's just demonizing a huge section of the base to make
his elitist point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #60
66. Yeah, because being a liberal is soooooooooooo elitist...
...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. You are elitist, your attitude is NOT liberal..
so many Dems want to point to the Pugs as being racist, corporate whores while espousing your bigot views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. Not even close..tell you what though...as soon as the north gets a rep for intolerance...
...bigotry and homophobia HALF as bad as the south we'll stop being "elitist snobs" m'kay?

:eyes:

Southern Dems have a name, they're called R-E-P-U-B-L-I-C-A-N-S....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #24
61. How Progressive of you..I would expect a statement like that from
a sexist, bigot pug not a Dem...oh yea, I forgot the party doesn't need the rural states to win as has been evidenced in the last few election cycles. :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #61
67. Well ya know it is a 'big tent' and all....
..:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
34. In the general election?
NE/ New England - he'd probably take everything except possibly New Hampshire, which can be kind of libertarian-twitchy. In fact, I was amazed that Kerry actually carried the state in the general in 04.

SE - Mississippi, Alabama, Kentucky, Tennessee - reliably, reflexively Republican states.

Midwest - Indiana

Great Plains - Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota

Intermountain West - Utah, Wyoming, Idaho - Alaska also questionable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
35. Primary? Clintedwardia. General? New Dumbfukland. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
36. He won't win Florida...
he doesn't have the Jewish vote, and it's a red state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #36
70. I agree.........he'll never win Florida.......n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fightindonkey Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
38. Sorry, I'm Talking Primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. Too Soon To Tell
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abburdlen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #38
45. Michigan
Michigan will be the toughest primary for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlertLurker Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
43. If Obama gets the Dem nomination, the entire South will secede.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #43
48. Most of the Black population is in the South.
I've got an extra bedroom, and I'm about an hour's drive from the Underground Railroad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlertLurker Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. My entire "Southern Experience" is two years in Texas...
But I travelled extensively through the Gulf States while I lived there (hubby worked for a Telecom company down there)...

It's a frightening experience to be "off-white" and female down there, let me assure you - especially when you are married to a white man. It still scares me just to think about some of it. Up until then I had quite literally, never experienced true racism.

I wouldn't ever go back. Nevernevernever. I am sure there is just as much racism elsewhere in the USA, but in the Deep South it is both immediately palpable and amply demonstrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpeale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
47. the gulf states hit hardest by Katrina
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
52. Utah, Idaho, Wyo. Nebr., Dakotas, Kans, OK, TX, Ala., SC, Ga, Miss, Alask, Indiana AND
North Carolina, Louisiana, Tennessee, Kentucky, Montana, Arizona, Arkansas, Virginia, West Virginia,
and Missouri.

No shot in hell in these 25 states for Obama (or any Dem for that matter), with the states in the subject line the biggest no shots in hell.

Almost no shot in hell for Obama: Florida

Slim chance, but likely defeat for Obama: Nevada, Colorado and Ohio

Toss-Up: Iowa and New Mexico

Good chance for Obama: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, New Hampshire

The rest are the Democratic base: no shot for any Repuke

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
63. It depends who the Republicans end up running
but my guess is that any Democratic presidential candidate will have trouble in Alaska. We may be getting rid of a couple of our Republican congressional representatives, but I think the presidential race will be the Republicans' to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
64. Depends On How Lousy The GOP Candidate Will Be
I'm thinking Reagan-sized victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC