Bill Clinton complained that New Hampshire got it wrong by having its primary so soon after Iowa.

Do you think he'd be complaining if Hillary WON Iowa? He also complained, falsely, that Obama got a free pass, never being asked about his "different positions" on the Iraq war (he's one to talk after claiming he was against it from the beginning) when Tim Russert asked him about it on MTP and Bill called and THANKED him for it! (No link-I heard it on MSNBC this morning). How sad that Bill Clinton is ruining his legacy like this.

:cry:

It's so sad that Bill has been reduced to this.

primary up? Hmmmmmm......

He wouldn't be grousing, either, if Hillary had won Iowa.

So I think we can give NH the benefit of the doubt.

sandnsea!~

very vigorously. But, I do think he was in full support of Iowa and New Hampshire and I don't recall him publicly asking Bill Gardner to hold off on New Hampshire's primary. (Why didn't he ask Michigan to not move forward - b/c if Michigan would have stayed put then NH would have stayed put and Iowa would have stayed put).

seen as a whiner and a liar.

while suporting his wife..kinda ruins the whole "legacy" thing.

:shrug:

I blame the influence of Bush I. :(

I don't think it was due to Bush 1's influence.

her inevitability. But, the lying came waaaaaaaaaay before.

I guess they're not used to losing.

C'est la vie

I fear what they'll try to do to him if he keeps winning like this.

weird before..we just didn't have the opportunity to see it up close and personal.

Oh, we have so much to look forward to, don't we?

Tell me again how this will be a change from Republican rule?

"Tell me again how this will be a change from Republican rule?"

If Obama wins it will be a HUGE change from Repub. rule!

it is too soon.

The primaries should be more spread out, not so our candidate is decided before we know who is going to the Super Bowl.

I do question his reason for bringing this up now, though.

Isn't it obvious?

makes me wonder about what it would be like in a two-Clinton White House.

What happens when there are two Presidents (a current and a former) in the White House the first time they disagree on policy?

Would Bill's loyalists in a Hillary Clinton administration lobby Hillary's cabinet members? Would Bill give doubt to Hillary's position with the press?

A few times this campaign I've wondered if Bill wasn't subconsciously undermining her campaign, as if he were thinking, "Hey, I'm the star in this family. I'm the President Clinton."

The potential for mischief with two such large personalities in the White House is there and, I think, worth considering.

I don't say this with fake "concern" for the Clinton campaign but with real concern for what it could mean for the country.

yesterday a TH (I forget who) said that it's against the Constitution for a president to serve more than two terms and a Hillary win would be bordering on breaking that amendment.

all by my lonesome. :)

What's TH?

GMTA. :D

Thanks. :)

That ought to take care of it.

cause they're acting like it's them or no Dems.

:applause:

:toast: