|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 02:35 PM Original message |
women are never front-runners |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. I'd say no, they couldn't be president, but not just because of gender. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 02:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. why do yo think women cannot be president in this "great" land? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #4 |
19. Their collar bones are too wide, so they have trouble lifting that big veto stamp all day long |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hydra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. What democracy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
3. Neither are corporate toadies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sulawesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
5. Why do I get the feeling that some are trying to pit different disenfranchised |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bad Thoughts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 02:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Amen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 02:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. It's a tough choice to have both a first black and a first woman.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. May I suggest assessing the candidates based on their actual qualifications instead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. "May I suggest assessing the candidates based on their actual qualifications instead?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 02:46 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. take a look at your history. the suffrage movement had to wait, women have always |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bad Thoughts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Come on, now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. the point is, they were IN the constitution, which, to this day, women are NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bad Thoughts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 04:17 PM Response to Reply #13 |
24. Would white women change places with black men ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demnan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
6. We will have our time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 02:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. we have been waiting since even before abigail instructed john to "remember the ladies" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
11. Gloria Steinem, once the outsider, has been schmoozing with the Democratic Establishment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
14. *sigh* This is pure shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. and you don't think the kind of coverage she has gotten has anything to do with it-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. Laughing in the face of confrontation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
15. Here, I fixed the analogy for her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
17. I don't think that being a woman is as big of a disadvantage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
18. It seems like just yesterday I was wondering when someone would post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. you really didn't understand whose resume that "theoretical" black woman's was? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 06:26 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. I assumed she was talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 06:28 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. "in an attempt to prop up hillary". wonder dismissive bullcrap from denialists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. So, here's an article from a Hillary supporter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC