So 54% of NH voted for one of the CHANGE candidates

Obma 37%
Edwards 17%

NOW do you see why Edwards hitched his wagon to Obama in the debate? Edwards knew that the campaigns of both Hillary and Obama were formidable in NH and with only 5 days there was no time for any real change (pardon the pun) in the infrastructure so he simply coupled himself with Obama. A vote for either was a vote for either.

Okay that is spin I know but it is a way of looking at it :shrug:


So now we go down to So.Carolina and Nevada, right? I thought that Edwards pulled up stakes a while ago in Nevada but a recent interview I saw with him had him saying that they had a good infrastructure out there. :shrug: What does his campaign in So.Carolina look like? :shrug:


Still Feb.5th is the biggee. IF Edwards can have a strong showing in SC and NV we could have a trhee way split on SUPER DUPER TUESDAY or we will indeed know who the nomineeS are the next day.

good one. :rofl:

(Edwards pledges to go the distance) HRC will be in the minority against the combined
Obama and Edwards of change. If Edwards doesn't have the most delegates by then
I can not imagine him releasing them to Clinton, can you?

by holding out until the convention he either gets to influence the party platform OR he establishes himself as a player now and in the future. It would be nice if he and Dean formed a coalition (maybe they have :shrug: ) for the Democratic wing of the Democratic party.

i can't quite remember, did he actually use the 70% voted for change thing, or was it just here and pundits.