|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:04 PM Original message |
If Obama supporters run "Vote Uncommitted" TV ads in MI does it break the pledge of no campaigning? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. I hope Uncommitted wins. I like it's open mindedness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ccpup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
2. sounds like it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:12 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Don't expect that unless Hillary runs away with the nomination and delegate counts no longer matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
3. Another possibility - take delegates away from Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
5. John Conyers is smarter than you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. "But, yes, in the end it shows support for Obama." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:22 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. So you're arguing that it is ethically wrong for Conyers to do this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:27 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. I think ethically wrong is far too strong a term. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diamonique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. He's smart enough not to OVERTLY make it an ad for Obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
6. Hey MI: Vote for Kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue State Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
9. A show of hands, or K-n-R's..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. In my opinion especially because of the ballot issue, MI delegates should not be seated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. It was my impression that the delegates will not be seated??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:30 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. That is the current situation. However there have been whispers and rumors. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Meldread (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nailzberg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
16. It's an independent expenditure. Obama is not running in Michigan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
18. It will keep Hillary from proclaiming victory and calling herself the "comeback kid". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
19. You tell me... Hillary is the onl;y contender to who chose to pay the fees to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Dodd & Kucinich remain on the ballot (Kucinich much to his consternation) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
20. Or perhaps Hillary and the others should take their names off the ballot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC