Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton has never regretted casting her IWR vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
pettypace Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:20 AM
Original message
Clinton has never regretted casting her IWR vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Her support was crucial to it's passage. And she doesn't regret it for a minute.
Not that she's crying over the death and destruction. Just over thinking she might not get to be president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Why was her vote the one
crucial for it's passage? No one knows whether she regrets voting for it, well actually she did say that if she knew that Bush would use it as an excuse to invade, she wouldn't have voted for it.

Her floor speech was NOT in favor of invasion, and unlike John Edwards, who in addition to cheerleading for the invasion, also co-sponsored it, she strongly cautioned AGAINST invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. anyone who voted for that piece of crap SHREDDED their credibility
and has LOTS OF BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. Here's her floor speech,
she didn't vote for invasion, she's responsible for trusting Bush's judgment:

snip: "We and our NATO allies did not depose Mr. Milosevic, who was responsible for more than a quarter of a million people being killed in the 1990s. Instead, by stopping his aggression in Bosnia and Kosovo, and keeping on the tough sanctions, we created the conditions in which his own people threw him out and led to his being in the dock being tried for war crimes as we speak.

If we were to attack Iraq now, alone or with few allies, it would set a precedent that could come back to haunt us. In recent days, Russia has talked of an invasion of Georgia to attack Chechen rebels. India has mentioned the possibility of a pre-emptive strike on Pakistan. And what if China were to perceive a threat from Taiwan?

So Mr. President, for all its appeal, a unilateral attack, while it cannot be ruled out, on the present facts is not a good option.

snip: While there is no perfect approach to this thorny dilemma, and while people of good faith and high intelligence can reach diametrically opposed conclusions, I believe the best course is to go to the UN for a strong resolution that scraps the 1998 restrictions on inspections and calls for complete, unlimited inspections with cooperation expected and demanded from Iraq. I know that the Administration wants more, including an explicit authorization to use force, but we may not be able to secure that now, perhaps even later. But if we get a clear requirement for unfettered inspections, I believe the authority to use force to enforce that mandate is inherent in the original 1991 UN resolution, as President Clinton recognized when he launched Operation Desert Fox in 1998.

snip: So it is with conviction that I support this resolution as being in the best interests of our nation. A vote for it is not a vote to rush to war; it is a vote that puts awesome responsibility in the hands of our President and we say to him - use these powers wisely and as a last resort. And it is a vote that says clearly to Saddam Hussein - this is your last chance - disarm or be disarmed.

http://clinton.senate.gov/speeches/iraq_101002.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #19
56. I just started a thread for her speech
This has been my main beef with Hillary but after reading her speech, I see that she made it clear she was not voting for Bush to wage a lawless war.

The thread is here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4020176

I've been arguing with a friend who thinks Hillary should have known (and probably did) what an untrustworthy person Bush is, however, Senators have to follow certain rules of decorum. I don't think they can just come out and say "He's a liar, I don't trust him." or can they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
32. What I want her to adress is this:
well actually she did say that if she knew that Bush would use it as an excuse to invade, she wouldn't have voted for it.


Simply answer why she felt that she could trust Bush to do the right thing with this power. Did she look into his soul (that's a figure of speech, because we all know he doesn't have one)? Did she look at the long list of promises he has kept? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. She said she regretted it,
the same way that Kerry regretted it, and Edwards, and every other Democrat who trusted the bastard. Did they all think they could look into his soul? If you condemn Clinton for trusting Bush, then you condemn every other Democrat who trusted him too.

John Edwards' speech and co-sponsorship, made Hillary Clinton look like a dove.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #37
44. When? Quote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #44
50. She said she'd never have voted yes,
if she knew then what she knew now about Bush, almost the same thing that Kerry said. If that doesn't constitute regret, I don't know what to say. She didn't vote for the damned invasion, but trusting bush is a deal breaker for some, and I understand it, as long as it's a deal breaker for all who voted yes.

Apologies don't mean shit, especially when they're worn on your sleeve as something to hold against your rivals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #50
60. it should be a deal-breaker for EVERY DEMOCRAT
it is SHAMEFUL to support anyone who was stupid enough to fall for that IWR bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #37
59. I DO CONDEMN THEM ALL
it is DISGUSTING than anyone who supported IWR is running for the presidency - and VERY DISCONCERTING that a lot of DUers are supporting them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Of course she doesn't regret it..
That vote is coming back to her in campaign $$$$ via the defense companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why would she regret it? She was posturing to look strong, and it worked.
If some people get hurt, too bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. this is sarcasm, right ?
it better be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Check the avatar. Of course it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
57. sorry
I don't know but I don't assume people who favor Obama don't care for Hillary; I don't care for either one. This campaign is distressing to me because I detest anyone who supported IWR but Obama just does not impress me. I'll vote my conscience: Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Three responses so far, not a Hillary supporter in the bunch yet
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. Misread this question
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 02:49 AM by The_Casual_Observer
I'll save you the caustic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. The OP's about the IWR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. "Any speculation as to why Obama was afraid to vote on this?"
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 02:43 AM by Occam Bandage
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

This would be the makeup of the Senate at the time of the IWR. There are 51 Democrats (including Jeffords), 49 Republicans, and zero Barack Obamas. They are all laughing at you.

:rofl:

This would be Barack Obama, who is in the Illinois State Senate, laughing at you after having given a strongly anti-war speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. My mistake, I misread the question. I'll be more careful next time.
You must have a very thin skin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. "Thin skin?" I wasn't aware you had insulted me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Apparently...
a penchant for facts means "thin skinned".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. Afraid to vote on the IWR?
He wasn't in office when that vote was held....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fabio Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. On the other hand...
she hasn't apologized for multiple votes - like nclb, the patriot act, china trade, bankruptcy bill and IWR. Some candidates have and for that reason I doubt their principles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
24. Remember Obama wasn't in national office at the time
so he didn't have a chance to vote on it one way or the other.

He made strong statements against the passage at the time, but he's been fairly "safe" in his voting record since coming to the senate, so who knows if he would have voted against it. Maybe he would have felt the same pressure as many other senate Dems...Wes Clark had a similar stumble early on in '04, where he said he may have voted for it.

It's hard to say unless you've actually been there.

I could be wrong, but I am disturbed that Hillary refuses to take proper responsibility for her vote. It was not a good one. I also am not convinced she learned the correct lessons from it, considering her vote for Kyle-Liemberman.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. It was purely political.
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 02:43 AM by AtomicKitten
If it was otherwise, she would have read the damn NIE first.

Yeah war!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. Don't worry the Republicans will remind us all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
13. That is why I'm voting for Obama and only open to Edwards in a VP capacity.
At least John Edwards had the GRACE to admit when he made a mistake. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I knew I liked you from the get-go.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. Awe, back at you AK.
Surprisingly even when we disagree, you're still aces with me.

It's personality! ;) :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
21. Wow! I had no idea she had voted in favor of it! Thanks for letting me know...
and thanks for your concern.:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. The question is why she has not had the sense to regret it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IamyourTVandIownyou Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
23. .. and 19% of Iraqi children are Orphans.
BS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
27. You're wrong, she did say she regretted it. This is an untrue and unfair attack.
She's said several times she regretted it, so your subject line is just false.

You are also using a quote from a while back when it was a big deal to people to call it a "mistake" rather than something regrettable, and some people made a huge fuss over her refusal to use the word mistake. It's crazy on both sides, but after she refused to use that word, she had to stick to tha decision. I understand that. Regret instead of mistake. SFW?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. No, she didn't.
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 02:54 AM by ingac70
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fabio Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. this is from 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. And?
She is no where on record as saying she regrets voting for the IWR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fabio Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #33
40. I am not an hrc supporter but I cant see how posting info from 4
years ago in any way supports your claim that she has never said she regrets her vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. How about her stance from 2007?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fabio Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. ????
I think my point stand re your previous post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #47
51. She doesn't regret it.
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 03:25 AM by ingac70
She didn't in 2004, and she didn't as recently as a few months ago. She is no where on record as having expressed regret over her vote for the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #27
36. I've heard her say she regretted it. I remember when she was badgered to say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. See post #38..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #27
38. Here is a 2005 survey...
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 03:10 AM by ingac70
of Senators that voted on the IWR and whether they regretted that vote or not....

http://www.politico.com/pdf/070205_iraqvote.pdf

On edit. I'm sorry, this was a 2007 survey, not 2005.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #27
42. Here's a Feb. 2007 story explicitly saying she doesn't regret it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #42
46. That doesn't provide any context at all.
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 03:20 AM by seasonedblue
She may not have regretted her vote, because she wasn't voting for invasion in the first place, something that her floor speech confirms. She has said that she'd never have voted yes, if she knew Bush would use the IRW to go to war. How is that different from what John Kerry said. Did you not vote for him in 04?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002
That was the official name of the Iraq war resolution. How could she NOT know Bush would go to war???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. Well I guess Hillary Clinton, and John Kerry, and John Edwards,
and every other Democrat voted knowing they were voting for war then. Condemn them all. Did you skip the 04 election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #52
53. As a matter of fact, I did...
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 03:33 AM by ingac70
I have principles and I don't whore them out.

I only voted for Senate and House, skipped the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. Excellent,
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 03:38 AM by seasonedblue
if you felt that way and stuck to your beliefs, I applaud you. I hate the hyprocrisy of those who only choose to condemn one, and not the all the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #27
45.  *Regret* ?!?
Whoa! We *regret* when we scratch someone's car door with ours, it's a *big fking MISTAKE* when we kill hundreds of thousands of civilians without the true threat to our country.

I'm ashamed of those who voted for the IWR but I can forgive those who are humble enough to reflect the FACT that they made a MISTAKE.

OMG! WE, The People of the United States, have allowed "the political elites" to run roughshod ... as such we also must take responsibility for THE MURDERS and/or SENSELESS DEATHS many precious human beings (both American and Iraqi) on our hands - AND - we, The American People should vow, "NEVER AGAIN!" Oh, BTW we did vow the foregoing after the horrific Vietnam Conflict, but that lesson did not stick. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #45
55. Thank you ShortnFiery.
The DU needs more of this sort of thinking imo. We The People, I think, have some difficulty seeing ourselves as the rest of the world sees us. I am wondering what a million-plus Iraqi refugees think of America right this moment. Do they blame bush or do they blame those who keep bush in power??? I wonder what those who have taken on the burden of those refugees think about America as well.... Lest we forget President Ford opened our doors to over a hundred thousand Vietnamese refugees...(bush is fighting to keep those doors shut tight!)... I wonder what members of Iraq's demolished Middle Class think, when an Al-Quida operative comes along and asks them, "Wanna get even?" That mushroom cloud bogeyman the bfee used to "inspire" Americans with prior to the war may come back to haunt us yet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #45
58. NO
I am DISGUSTED by the number of so-called progressives - including a lot of DUers - who are willing to over look Democrats support of IWR. IT WAS SICKENING, DETESTABLE AND INDEFENSIBLE. I don't give a CRAP if the people who voted for IWR now "regret" it or claim they were "misled" - they were either stupid or complicit and either way THEY F***ING STINK. I cannot believe people voted Democrats into the majority to do something about Iraq but are willing to VOTE for the VERY PEOPLE WHO HELPED START IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
28. It's all politics.
And that's the sad part. Lots of our "leaders" blow in the political winds and do what is popular at the time instead of doing what's right. It's just the way it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
29. I have just as much reservation or more about all those
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 02:54 AM by OHdem10
Present votes of Barak.

Whether we like it or not the Democratic Party has an internationalists
position on Foreign Policy this includes Miliary and a strong defense.
As long as we have the party we will have Militarists and Hawks in
our Party. Even Al Gore believed this.

Hopefully they have all learned their lesson from Iraq. They of course
will not be able to say this in public.

Personally, I do not believe Hilary will be tryign to venture
all around the world "spreading Democracy" I forgive her the vote and
say do not let it happen again.Hilary I believe wwill exhaust all
means of diplomacy and War will be a last resort.

Our party will always have the Military Component. Even Al Gore was
pro Afghansistan War and anti Iraq War.

I am an Edward's Supporter, but I also like HRC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. I forgive her vote, but I don't forgive her arrogance, HRC unapologetically claims that she was
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 03:00 AM by ShortnFiery
duped by the Bush Bots and The Intelligence Community. I'm not buying that load of crap.

BTW, why do we have to remain in a state of "perpetual war" even as we occupy (and thoughtfully draw down troops from) two Countries?

I don't know about you, but I'm NOT at war with a f**king tactic, i.e., terrorism :wtf:.

We can choose NOT to swagger as a Super Power, but be a gentle giant - opting for far more use of diplomatic carrots and intense diplomatic interaction, rather than defaulting to "blowing shit up" as our first response? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
35. Hillary on Iraq... video....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
41. I don't require her to don sackcloth and ashes for that vote, as many here
seem to want.

She has acknowledged that if she had known the facts that came out later, she would have voted differently.

There is also the issue that she -- and a number of other Democrats -- voted for the COMPROMISE IWR in October 2002 because they knew that if it was defeated, then Bush would simply get his preferred version -- allowing him to attack terrorists anywhere, not just in Iraq -- as soon as the new Rethug majority took over in January.

The Dems were between a rock and a hard place. Some chose to sign on to the compromise resolution, in order to prevent a worse one from being passed a few months later. For all we know, if Bush had had his way and gotten his preferred IWR, we would already be in Iran by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #41
48. Well, if you're not former military married to a retired military person, you don't FEEL the pain
when those whom you've served with have died or been maimed thanks to the votes Democratic Hawks. No worries of HRCs little dear, Chelsea, patrolling Baghdad with the MP detachment in the near future.

It doesn't mean SQUAT to those who view it like a fucking PACMAN game but it has hit home for me and many other members within the retired and AD communities around this country. :grr:

I have no respect for HRC's blathering swagger and feigned sighs of excuses that "it's someone elses' fault." (Bush, Rumsfeld, The entire Intelligence Community)

I FEAR when I consider how petty and self-absorbed an "Iron Maiden" Clinton Presidency would reflect our country AB/DC (After Bush/During Clinton)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #48
62. YOU KNOW IT SnF
I AM TIRED OF DUers MAKING EXCUSES FOR THAT IWR VOTE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #48
65. Bush would have had his IWR with or without the help of any Democrats.
If the Dems hadn't agreed on the compromise version in October, he'd have had even more of a blank check in January. And we'd probably be in Iran now with even more dead.

I do feel strongly for you and everyone who has lost people in this war, and I was one of the protesters in the months before the war began. But I don't blame any Dem for our involvement there. If Gore had been in the White House, this never would have happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
61. This article is from February 18, 2007.
It seems to me that that is a relevant piece of information. Why did you leave it out of your post?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fightindonkey Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
63. Because Under the Circustances, If The Information Was Correct Instead of Tainted, It Would Have
Right for her to do. She gave Bush the benefit of the doubt, like the majority of senators. If that info happened to be correct, she would of course have to support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fightindonkey Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. They Originally Voted To Go Into Afghanistan. People Forget That. Barck Continues To Fund It
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC