Just By Looking At The Designs, Which Candidate Has The Best Bumper Sticker?

...of course! :)
<><><>

GET OUT THE VOTE! http://www.cafepress.com/powerboutique

oy

That's what she said at one of the debates about being the candidate who can take on the right-wing machine ~ remember??

...just let him get in a bit of shuteye first.....SNXXXXX...

I bet some of the campaigns have more than one:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4026352

:hide:

Very nice design.

Duncan Hunter's, by comparison, sucks. Rudy's isn't very good, either.

Glad I'm not alone on this.

Richardson's is up there. :hi:

Can't stand the asshole, but it's the best designed bumper sticker, from the choices displayed.

It sure was hard to do! :P

So did Gilmore's, I guess. (Whoever that guy was.)

Should be pointing left not `

Oh, but then he'd be accused of leaning to the left.

But it looks good against blue, as it appears on his website.

Holy shit...BLACK? Did he bother to hire a marketing consultant? Does he realize black is equated with death? And the star? A star on a black background? Shoot me now.

.

Subtle, eh?

Although McCain's ain't bad.

GOBAMA! FIRED UP!

I would have voted for mitt's sticker but voted Obama instead.

I just can't cast a vote for a republic under any circumstances. It's a disease/mental/physical block for me.

Now I have to punish myself :banghead:

Not the same thing at all. :pals:

I think the ones with colorful backgrounds tend to look better than the whites ones, and I like the writing style and the red and blue star on Richardson's.

But it's pretty clear from this that it works the best ~ McCain and Dodd's just don't do it.
<><><>

GET OUT THE VOTE! http://www.cafepress.com/powerboutique

You're looking for meaning, not just appealing graphics.

Obama's is the best because they've obviously taken the "O" and made it look like a rising sun. So you've got a synopsis of what his campaign is supposed to be about right there. Very clever.

McCain's is good because it references his military experience, which is his hallmark.

Guiliani's is quite plain, and seems to suggest that people should vote for him based on familiarity. That'll appeal to people.

The others look alright, but aren't saying anything to me.

It's very soothing to the eyes

If Edwards was smart, his logo should be a "1".

Biden's should have been a microphone.

Hillary's a kleenex.

Kucinich's = a ufo

Gravel's = a potted plant

Rudy's = the twin towers.

Hunter's = a fence

McCain = The Iraqi flag.

Romney's = a question mark

Huckabee's = a bible.

Just a little silliness on a Thursday afternoon :)

working class image
getting things done
understanding the nuts and bolts of issues
his mom's wit, which he inherited

and it would have gotten people to ask about the story behind it...

I loved that story.
As a matter of fact, I loved most of Biden's stories.
The nuts and bolts story definitely gave you a sense of who he was.


(I was just getting a little silly in my previous post)

:evilgrin:

9/11 9/11 9/11
9/11 RUDY 9/11
9/11 9/11 9/11

A missed opportunity.

Both have impeccable typography. And Obama's logo (without the logotype) is very, very good.

not for president or this year or anything, just support their brands in general.

Hillary and Obama are next and too close to call. :)

The font choice is good, the serifs are reminiscent of words chiseled into marble monuments. The red underscore anchors the copy and provides a dash of primary color.

Too bad I hate his policies.

;)

None have the zing of my favorite: "Repeel Bananas!"

Evocative of morning, newness, the stripes a field of freshly sown grain, the O is round soft, inviting. It's elemental.

Romneys is very clean, well designed.

Dodd for some reason has a neutral color brownish grey, that doesn't stand out in any way. I guess the brown could ssuggest that Dodd has his feet solidly on the ground, but also suggests a pedestrian stolidity.

Rudy and Hillary opt for the familiar, informal approach, first names only. That's all Rudy gives you; you supply the rest. The square design implies stability and strength.

Hillary's name appears over a rolling wave-shaped flag, suggesting her sweeping forward to victory. Three stars indicate confidence, quality, strength.

Edwards' is interesting in that it is the only sticker to include green; a play for Green minded voters? Green also implies freshness, newness, cleaness, moving forward; negatively, it implies inexperience. The rising/shooting star suggests Edwards' upward trajectory.

McCain's is very martial, solid, and aggressive, a clear play to his presumed foreign policy and military experience. The design is spiky, aggresive, and not especially inviting; it does however, indicate strength.

Worst are Rudy's and Dodd's. Where are Kucinich and Gravel's stickers? And what about Huckabee? Is it a cross?

But went with Romney. It's very clean, pleasant on the eyes. It actually looks like something out of the credits of the West Wing...