|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
donsu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:00 PM Original message |
don't scream - I have to ask this question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
1. Whoever gets the White House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Obama doesn't take lobbyist money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donsu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:12 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. I wasn't speaking of lobbyist - oil Baron pharma Baron coal Baron |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. The percentage of money from those sources is no greater |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donsu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
18. I wasn't talking about money given to Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Okay, so, why single out Obama in particular? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
43. Here are Obama's Top Contributors as of October '07 last filing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
17. Who said I was talking about Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnhtnbb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:59 PM Response to Reply #2 |
36. Obama is up to his a$$ in lobbyist backing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. That's why the PEOPLE need to put Edwards in the WH. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. If he did not wear wife beaters maybe we would have stayed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:17 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. What? What actions? Wearing a certain style of shirt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:23 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. While I agree that to me, Edwards' actions speak louder than his words, what on Earth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. They just represent what has transpired. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Could we be a little less vague? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:34 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Tag teaming a woman is a clue. Back to the silent treatment with me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:34 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. While it was politically idiotic, it wasn't sexist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Right. Hahahahahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yeah. Poor naive colored boy, in over his head. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donsu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. that's not what I was thinking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. It's a rather ridiculous question. What makes you believe Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:20 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Interesting questions indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donsu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. from the Baron's point of view - neo con Barons have been flying high |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:34 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Okay, so why single out Obama? Couldn't the question be asked of any candidate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
42. Back to bare foot and pregnant for women! What issue..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Oh come on! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. So then, why does the OP single out Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. I didn't read the OP as saying he'd be THE ONLY candidate who they'd try to control. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Well, then let's break it down, shall we? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:34 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. I'm glad you decided to do so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:44 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Let's. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Are you serious? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:54 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. "Please... "kiss up" makes "manipulate" unnecssary... " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:58 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. And, it was about race after all, as in #34. Sorry OP wasn't clear enough for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:59 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. Ooooh... a victory post... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. So, in an argument, it is considered bad taste to bring information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. It is insulting, cause it assumes I didn't see it for myself... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:59 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. ..."well, that doesn't mean he was particularly clear to you, either." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. My kneejerking seems to have been warranted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donsu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:36 PM Response to Reply #14 |
28. because we know how it goes with Hill, Edwards, Kucinich, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:47 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Do we really? We know Edwards claims he'll "stand up" to your "Barons". But that's not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donsu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. because the neo con Barons are racists and racists think they can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. He'll be up there shuckin n' jivin' while the record producers...er... I mean white politicians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC