If the Clinton backlash is much ado about nothing, why is Bill doing damage control?
wndycty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:21 PM
Original message
If the Clinton backlash is much ado about nothing, why is Bill doing damage control?
I see a lot of folks on DU mocking and ridiculing those of us who feel that the Clintons have recently resorted to some racially offensive tactics. Saying we are over reacting treating us like we are crazy people making things up. But I have simple question for you. Why is Bill doing so much damage control today? If we are crazy and no one else shares our opinion why has Bill done 3 nationally syndicated radio shows to defend his fairy tale comments?
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good question. No logical answer. nt
Edited on Fri Jan-11-08 05:23 PM by babylonsister
terisan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because his comment was taken out of context. He is setting record straight !
If people twist your words to gain a pokitical advantage you must set the record straight.
K Gardner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't know, but he surely didn't defend them very well. I've heard no positive
coverage in the two different broadcasts I've seen/heard about it. Maybe Bill should just be seen and not heard :-) Although I did hear they were putting a Rapid Response Damage Control Team in his entourage.
goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's damned if he does and he's screwed if he doesn't. At least he's stepping up to the plate.
wndycty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. And while many of you mock and ridicule Bill at least extends an olive branch. . .
. . .that is a lot more than the folks who are telling us we are crazy race baiters.
durrrty libby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Indeed..plenty of "crazy race baiters." Jesse Jackson Jr being
at the top of the list doing Obama's bidding I won't be sad if it backfires on the hypocritical Hope and Change crowd
Fresh_Start
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. gee, maybe because Clinton can't afford to lose supporters
but I'm not politically savvy so maybe it has nothing to do with voters and just has to do with the comments on DU
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. And cry RACE VICTIM will cause mass rallies to Obama?
There is no good outcome here. After decades of hearty welcome in the national black community, suddenly the Clintons are racist bigots? Because what? Nobody noticed before? Pull the other one. We can only have one first: the first woman or the first black man. Two groups of Americans whose hearts will soar or be broken. Anyone who thought the issue was war or health care is wrong.
undercoverduer
(344 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
Oh God. . .your words speak for themselve.
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. You're right. There is no good outcome here. But nobody called
the Clintons bigots. They're just accused of using racist tactics for personal gain. Republicans do it all the time. Most of them are no more racist or homophobic than the average Dem.
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is embarrassing, shameful, humiliating
I don't know what to say to the reaction about these out and out racist statements. I really don't. I don't know how people defend "shuck and jive" and now the imaginary hip friend bullshit, the slam on MLK. I don't know what to say. It's just awful.
Bonobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Didn't you hear? "Shuck 'N Jive" is just a quaintly archaic way of speaking.
Meshuga
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:25 PM
Original message
Kerry was swiftboated in 2004 and didn't want to respond to lies
so he waited and see what a mistake that was. The supid charges of racially offensife tactics should not go unanswered. He should go defend his statement from the smear.
wndycty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. He didn't defend himself he just said the comments were taken out of context
The_Casual_Observer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Racial tactics could probably be read into anything at any time.
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
Anyone here who is NOT self-editing?
The_Casual_Observer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. There have been more than a few posts I never submitted
because they could be totally misinterpreted. Probably this one too. Better to not say anything.
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. he`d have nothing to do...well he could clean up around the bus
i`m sure there`s trash to take out and beds to be made...
ruggerson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. Because Drudge breathlessly reports anything anti Hillary and then it gets reposted here
and on other sites and people around the country read it. I suppose he wants to combat the rightwing machine.
undercoverduer
(344 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. So you are blaming Drudge for things printed in the NY Times, Washington Post and on CNN's website?
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Hell no. I can't see a difference between them is all.
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. Well I for one hope that Hillary's team will be more considerate
concerning those who brought them to the dance. They have behaved like fair-weather friends. I hope they will reconsider their tactis before they destroy the party in their efforts to realize THEIR dream of getting Hillary elected. There are things that are more important than that.
Evergreen Emerald
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. right. She better walk on egg shells and make sure to say nothing
that the press and those who are great at playing politics might distort and shout RACISM!! from the rooftops.
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Jan-11-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
She better be "Miss Peace at Any Price". She better not defend herself - that would be RACIST.
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Thu May 16th 2024, 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.