Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The torture issue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 09:01 PM
Original message
The torture issue
The US has lost it's position as the good guy in the white hat with the revelations of secret renditions and torture (er, I meant "Harsh interrogation techniques")

In the mind of the average voter, is torture:

A) A great idea that should be practiced on most Muslims
B) Not an issue that really impacts my job/home/business
C) A practice we need to stop in order to begin to restore our world standing
D) A morally repugnant practice that has brought shame to our nation


Here's where I'm going. I think most Obama & Clinton voters are in C & D thinking. I think most Indys and Reps are somewhere between A & B. How do we campaign against torture, while not appearing weak and naive with the respect to terrorists who have shown no compunction to kill, maim, and torture?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. E -- I think that the average voter thinks it's a necessary evil in our "War on Terror"
Edited on Sat Jan-12-08 09:12 PM by Time for change
The average voter doesn't understand that the vast majority of torture, and perhaps all of it, including that practiced by the Bush administration, provides little or no intelligence value for us, and what little it does provide is greatly outweighed by all the negatives, including serving as an impetus for the recruitment of more anti-American terrorists.

Here is an article I posted a few months ago on it:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=1156927

The average voter needs to be educated on the facts. I think that all of the Democratic candidates did a fine job in the debates on this issue when Tim Russert tried to bait them into condoning torture.

Welcome to DU OmahaBlueDog :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Excellent point! "E" is also a often held view
I'll check out the article.

I've read many of the Steven AMbrose books on WWII (Citizen Soldiers, Band of Brothers, The Wild Blue). He makes two really good points about torture.

1) The threat of torture makes opposing forces far less likely to surrender; conversely, the knowledge that your opponent takes decent care of prisoners makes surrender more likely in a tough fight.

2) Torture gets you whatever the victim thinks you want to hear or whatever he can convince you is the truth. We all love the ticking bomb theory, but it's rarely the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes, those are very good points too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Since Bill Clinton is the one that started CIA renditions in 1994
perhaps torture will be embraced by the Democratic convention in Denver, depending as to whether Bill returns to the White House or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anouka Donating Member (712 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hi. Can you explain?
was that in response to the Contract with America? what was the story of that? what happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Bill Clinton coundn't have started CIA renditions
... since they trace their origins to their parent organization, the OSS, and President FDR, who also sanctioned "harsh interrogation techniques" "secret courts" and other pleasantries.

Nice try, though.

While we're in the mile high city, discussing whatever it is we Dems discuss, you Greens can amuse yourselves in whatever high school auditorium you rent for your convention. You all can discuss the good ol' days when Ralphie boy stood up to Al Gore and kept him outta da White House! You Greens have to be proud of that moment ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Watch it on knocking the green party
Insulting people who care about labor, environmental, and other issues is not cool. Despite the labels being recycled, both the major parties were considered "fringe" by someone at some point, and their positions have changed dramatically over time. In a presidential rather than parliamentary system, 3rd parties don't have as much pull, but if that's what it takes for voices to be heard, that's what it takes. I suppose you're also on the Kucinich-and-Gravel-should-shut-up wagon. And you take having money to rent a big convention hall as evidence of quality? Great.

I lived in a guaranteed Democratic state in 2000. I voted Green to help the state party get enough support for public financing etc. and as a protest against Lieberman being on the ticket and the ineptitude of that state Dem. party at the time. If I lived in Florida, no I wouldn't have. But voting for L. would have been hard.

Blaming the Greens makes the GOP happy. Blame Bush Sr.'s supreme court appointments, Katherine Harris et al. in Florida, Gore for not winning Tennessee, Gore for stifling his real passions, what have you, but blaming it all on Nader is the easy way out.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I'm Oh So Sorry if I Offended a Green
You can't handle the truth! Greens, we live in a world that has Republicans, and those Republicans have to be opposed by people with at least a snowballs chance in Hell of being elected. Who's gonna do it? You? You, JoeIsOneOfUs? Democrats have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Ralph Nader, and you curse Katherine Harris. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know - that Ralph Nader's candidacy, while tragic, probably cost Al Gore the Presidency; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves us from more Sam Alitos and John Roberts'. You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want the Democtats elected -- you need the Democrats elected. We use words like "Change," "Fairness," "Universal Healthcare." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to Greens who rise and sleep under the blanket of the very freedom that Democrats provide and then questions the manner in which they provide it. I would rather the Greens just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you start a petition and run for office. Either way, I don't give a damn who you think I shouldn't insult!

By the way, check out a wonderful web page: http://2act.org/p/33.html It'll give you the facts on Florida.

.. and I might have jumped on the Kucinich-and-Gravel-should-shut-up wagon, if even 1% of America gave a rats behind about a word they said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anouka Donating Member (712 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. This issue is deeper than Dem vs. Rep -- ask McCain.
I wonder what one's opinion of law enforcement and/or the military would have to do with how one feels about torture?

Also, how closely one empathizes that one could be on the receiving end of such tactics?

McCain is a Republican, but as a victim of real torture, he's as Anti-Torture as they come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. I seriously doubt that a man of Bill Clinton's respect for his fellow man
Edited on Sat Jan-12-08 09:53 PM by MasonJar
sanctioned torture. I would need solid documentation of such a charge. However, having experienced the sociopathic W, I feel certain that he would have no compunction about torturing his next door neighbor....unless of course that neighbor happened to be Dick Cheney, who would have W on the rack at a moment's notice in retribution. If I see W and Cheney when I enter the next life, I will know immediately that I have been sent to the darkest corner of Hades. Seeing them here on Earth is already hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC