|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Tropics_Dude83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:46 AM Original message |
Breaking-First Nevada poll since IA/NH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpeale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
1. there are 3 candidates so i don't believe your poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tropics_Dude83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:48 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. You really are a piece of work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:49 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Hey ass hat -- why only include 2 of the 3 candidates on that link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tropics_Dude83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:51 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Hey asshat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:52 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. When he is in a dead heat tie within the MOE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:51 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. No Need For Actual Name Calling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
51. I'm an up-front kind of guy.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MBS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 05:48 PM Response to Reply #10 |
70. see Tropics' link for full info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GalleryGod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:50 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Thanks for the info, TD! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
61. deleted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #1 |
18. Actually, there are four |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpeale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #18 |
42. i apologize to kucinich supporters. the poll is still BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Earth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 03:11 PM Response to Reply #1 |
56. aren't there FOUR candidates? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 05:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
71. There are 4 candidates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
2. You should include Edwards. He's close 27% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:49 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Apparently the OP doesn't think its relevent enough to include |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
34. He had reached his cut'n paste capacity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #34 |
45. I don't know, but whoever is kicking the ant hill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 12:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
37. Hey, that's great for him! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. Because everyone thought he was at 10% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #2 |
50. Three way race |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
3. John who? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tropics_Dude83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:49 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. John Edwards has no chance of being the nominee n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
28. I guess we all know -- that it just ain't so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 12:47 PM Response to Reply #9 |
38. Why would you say that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
46. Neither did that Bill Clinton guy in 1992. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
31. And a margin of error of 4.5%. In other words, too close to call. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GalleryGod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
5. Are the Clintons still "trying to change the rules" after the Culinary Workers endorsed Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
6. The Swiftboating of Clinton on Race is succeeding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
8. Here is a better link with Edwards within Clinton's MOE at 27% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:50 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. It is the same poll. OP didn't find the 27% relevant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:59 AM Response to Reply #8 |
23. Wow - Go Edwards! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
32. Not just Clinton, but Obama as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
74. Wow a three way split |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
15. Yeah, that's not transparent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TerwilligeRedux (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
16. I couldn't find the poll you are referring to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tropics_Dude83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Here's a better link for ya! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TerwilligeRedux (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:56 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. the most important number in this poll is the Edwards vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tropics_Dude83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:59 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. If RCP had included it, I would have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. You can still edit the OP, I believe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 12:42 PM Response to Reply #25 |
36. They do include the Edwards number |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
20. Premeditated JEDNE... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
22. Your mom's up and wants to log onto the "OK Magazine" site... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
24. Where at your link is this news? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
26. John Edwards almost tied for lead in NV - Obama 32, Clinton 30, Edwards 27 (MOE 4.5%) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
27. Edwards at 27% - great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
29. Great news for Edwards! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 12:23 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Question is, will Brian Williams give him any screen time tomorrow night? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #30 |
40. With only three up there they would look silly leaving him out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Well, if they put John off to one side and use a narrow camera angle, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. J.E. will lead the debate, especially with just the three of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:16 PM Response to Reply #30 |
73. fuck no ..corporate media is scared shitless of Edwards..they are cowards and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:00 PM Response to Reply #73 |
78. Right on fly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
35. Nice. There goes another firewall. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoBorders (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
39. Those 25 points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
47. Wow! A tie! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corkhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
48. "Hillary had been up 25 points." so Obama should now be up by... Doh! there is more than 2 in this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
49. Yes! Huge shift, still close though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
52. Wow, so 38% are undecided? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrdemocrat78 (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 04:56 PM Response to Reply #52 |
66. Wow, someone else who doesn't bother to read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 05:19 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Yeah, I read that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
53. My Aunt is caucusing in Winnemucca NV changed from Hillary to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #53 |
80. w00t!! Thanks for posting this! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #53 |
81. w00t!! Thanks for posting this! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadowLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
54. Wow, good to see Obama in the lead, but it's definitely still a close 3 way race |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TerwilligeRedux (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
55. Woops! I guess you missed the deadline for editing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
57. Well, well, well, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
58. omg plz let edwards overtake clinton!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tgnyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
59. JEDNE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 04:00 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. What does that mean? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slick8790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. John Edwards Does Not Exist. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. Why do people keep posting it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slick8790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 04:27 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Not exactly sure how it started. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 07:03 PM Response to Reply #64 |
79. The Invisible Candidate! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
65. Great news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
68. where is my candidate?? i think this is bullshit..unadulterated bullshit!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jasmine621 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 05:39 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. If the polls are saying it that close, HC will win again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:08 PM Response to Reply #69 |
72. bullhockey!!..it's anyones to win..and people are getting damn pissed Edwards is being ignored.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:24 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. Here is a better link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:26 PM Response to Reply #69 |
77. Like the polls said is was close in Iowa? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
76. Once again, it will all come down to turnout, and this time on a Saturday afternoon. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-14-08 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
82. I think I will just have to kick this up. I might do it many times, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC