Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rasmussen Daily Tracking Poll: Clinton 38% (-2), Obama 34% (-2), Edwards 13% (+1)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:15 PM
Original message
Rasmussen Daily Tracking Poll: Clinton 38% (-2), Obama 34% (-2), Edwards 13% (+1)
No change over the last couple days with Clinton keeping a national four point lead in the Rasmussen poll.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/daily_presidential_tracking_polling_history
\
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. If Obama picks up wins in NV and SC, Super Tuesday looks good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rasmussen inaccurate as usual
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Maybe, maybe not, but you certainly have
no way of knowing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Cali and others -- smell the horse manure
Here's is an exquisite example of a troll, identifiable from his other threads and posts as well. It would be useful for authentic progressives, instead of putting people on 'ignore' (which means these folk still proliferate but aren't answered), developing a list of them at least for our own edification.

From a 'terrible 22' it would likely rapidly expand to a 'slimy 61' etc.

I am sure that my forwardness probably offends at least some, but I really put an effort in longer posts of developing arguments and linking and documenting things accurately, and not (protestations to the contrary notwithstanding) mischaracterizing fact situations in my posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nice.
Thank you!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC