Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dear President Gore: I'm sorry, but it is your patriotic duty as an American to

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:24 PM
Original message
Dear President Gore: I'm sorry, but it is your patriotic duty as an American to
to assume the Presidency in 2009.

Our country is in great peril and on the verge of collapse. We have had 7 years of a presidential administration that has instituted policies and undertaken actions that are calculated deliberate attempts to destroy our democracy and the well being of the American People.

In order to rectify this situation, it is imperative to the continued existence of our nation that an experienced, knowledgeable, and sincere Democrat that can unite the Democratic Party campaign for the Presidency.

That Democrat is you, Mr. President.

The current field of Democratic candidates are all wonderful candidates. However, there are valid questions regarding the electability of some of these candidates, and there seems to be a significant media bias that very possibly will hamper the possible election of other candidates.

Mr. President, if you were to announce your candidacy today, there is no doubt in my mind that you would unite the Democratic Party and win the Democratic Presidential nomination and subsequently the general election. I think it is very possible that other Democratic candidates would defer to your candidacy, and drop out of the race, out of a sense of obligation to the needs of our country and an understanding of the necessary party unity that your candidacy would bring. Furthermore, I believe that the energy and unity that an announcement of your candidacy would bring to the Democratic Party would lead to a substantial increase of Democrats elected to both Houses of Congress this year.

Mr. President, you have made it clear that you do not intend to seek the Presidency. But we absolutely cannot risk having another republican in the WH in 2009. Your candidacy would energize and unite the Democratic party, which in turn would guarantee your election to the Presidency.

Our country really needs you, right now Mr. President, to take on what is now possibly the most difficult job in the history of our nation, because it is apparent that you are the right person at the right time to take on this responsibility.

Therefore, I feel that it is my duty to humbly and apologetically ask you to do your duty toward our nation and run for the Office of President of the United States, despite the many valid reasons for your reluctance to do so.

Our country is depending on you, Mr. President.

Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. No thanks. Obama will do fine. Our party is VERY energized. Keep your day job, Al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kinda too late for that. Besides, the Earth needs him more.
The last thing we need is to make climate change look like a political issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. What do you think would happen if Al announced tomorrow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. He'd pick up maybe 5% of the polls, Clinton, Obama, and Edwards would attack him mercilessly
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 12:52 PM by Occam Bandage
for insulting the Democratic party and American voting public, he wouldn't be able to get on any state ballots, and he wouldn't have more than a handful of delegates at the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Awww geez..........


Sorry, the Gore train is done. If he wanted to be president he had several opportunities to jump in the game including in 2007 when everyone geared up their campaign.

I'm sure Al Gore will be an important part of any democrat in the White House in 2008 but Al Gore owes us nothing when it comes to 'assuming the White House'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I agree.
It's too late for that now, though I suppose he could run at a later time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Gore never had much backing among Democrats. On DU: lots of backing
He'd be also-ran in the nomination process - perhaps behind Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. no, the country is not depending on him. In fact, I don't want him
as president. He could have run, he chose not to. that's his right, but no way would it be acceptable if he decided he could just waltz in now.

And it's literally nuts to think that after all their work and slogging, the others should just bow and scrape and withdraw. He's not a fucking king or saint.

He would NOT unite the party. Not at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philly_bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. Perhaps if the convention is deadlocked. Otherwise Dept. of Energy for Al! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. Without Al as our Candidate, We May be Looking at Another Repiglickin President
We are running the second string this year for some reason.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes. Given how John Edwards and to a greater extent Dennis Kucinich
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 02:17 PM by Zorra
have been ignored by corporate media, and given that the two leading candidates have received enormous sums in contributions from large corporations, we might conclude that our candidate(s) have been pre-selected for us by special interests with intentions counter to the continued well-being of the American people.

Furthermore, these two leading candidates seem to have serious electability issues at this time, as polls repeatedly show them losing the general election to very inferior republican candidates.

At the same time, the Democratic candidate that consistently polls higher than the republican field is placed third in the Democratic primary.

I am genuinely concerned that Democrats are snatching defeat from the jaws of certain victory in the general election by nominating a candidate that has significantly lower chances of defeating the republican challenger.

Since corporations and the corporate media have been undeniably favorable to the current extreme RW (p)Resident, his administration, and republican Congress, I have no choice but to suspect that we are being set up to lose this Presidential election, an election that we would otherwise win in a landslide if a much more universally acceptable Democratic candidate were to be our nominee.

So I believe that Al Gore should step in, because I believe that his experience and high profile current appeal as a candidate will make him impervious to corporate/corporate media attacks.

I think the people would embrace his candidacy and carry him into the WH on their shoulders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. This will not happen.
Al Gore is not running. He is satisfied with what he is doing. The media crucified him in 2000. He has no desire to endure that again. I don't blame him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. *rolly~eyes emoticon*
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. Considering Al has more REAL experience than HC, BO, & JE combined...
I'm voting for him anyway -- at least in the primaries. (It'll all be decided before my state gets to vote.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. /applaud if only because as much as the Edwards and Kucinich
supporters cling to their hopes, you have a right to hold yours.

I wish gore were running but I'd be happy w/ Obama or Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. Al would have been the first candidate I could have supported with enthusiasm
As it is, I've got less than three weeks to come up with a tepid substitute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Tepid.
Yep, that's my vote too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. I must agree.
... particularly with this point:

Mr. President, if you were to announce your candidacy today, there is no doubt in my mind that you would unite the Democratic Party and win the Democratic Presidential nomination and subsequently the general election. I think it is very possible that other Democratic candidates would defer to your candidacy, and drop out of the race, out of a sense of obligation to the needs of our country and an understanding of the necessary party unity that your candidacy would bring.


Sadly, I don't believe he will accept this call to duty. I think he has had enough. Frankly, I don't blame him. I still haven't "gotten over" the 2000 election. I can only imagine how the thought of re-entering politics must make him feel.

k&r

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC