Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Edwards Not Planning to Quietly Fade Away

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:21 AM
Original message
John Edwards Not Planning to Quietly Fade Away
Huffington Post
Marc Cooper
January 17, 2008

Las Vegas, NV - As he pinballs and caroms through Nevada union halls, vet centers and community meeting rooms packed with cheering, sometimes fervent crowds vowing to stand for him in this coming Saturday's caucuses, Democratic candidate John Edwards is showing absolutely no inclination toward quietly fading from the 2008 presidential race.

Though written off by much of the media and the punditocracy as the third-running and under-financed national contender behind rivals Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, the former North Carolina senator seems nevertheless buoyed by a cushion of support from organized labor, as well as from some statewide polls that put him within a few points of striking distance behind his two higher-profile opponents.

As a pulsating crowd of hundreds of union-jacketed supporters jam-packed into the local Carpenters Union hall Thursday night repeatedly stood on their feet and chanted "Go, John, Go!", a beaming Edwards, wearing jeans under his blue blazer, proclaimed himself a serious contender in the coming Democratic primaries. "The other night in the debate," he said referring to Tuesday's televised Vegas stand-off among the candidates, "a lot of caucus voters realized that contrary to what the media's been telling them for the last year there's not two, but rather three candidates in this race."

~Snip~

Edwards appeared on the stage as a conquering hero and, brimming with confidence and determination, he immediately brought the crowd to its feet when he vowed with a rising voice and an extended right arm: "When I'm president, and when it becomes necessary... to go on strike, to be out walking that picket line - when I'm president--nobody, but nobody is gonna cross that picket line!"

While Edward's Nevada base is rock-solid organized labor, not even close to a majority of Nevada unions have lined up with him. When his campaign began to lag earlier this year, the long expected endorsements of the powerful Culinary workers and the Service Employees (SEIU) never materialized. They recently went with Obama. Meanwhile, the teachers union and the public employees in AFSCME lined up with Clinton.

But union members don't always vote with their leadership and that's one factor Edwards is counting on. Apart from the formal endorsement of the 12,000 members Carpenters Union, Edwards is hoping to siphon off rank-and-file members of other unions attracted by his increasingly fiery denunciations of what he calls the "corporate stranglehold on America." Indeed, among the audience Wednesday night were numerous supporters wearing the colors of the SEIU. "Everyone knows our union wanted Edwards from the beginning but settled for Obama when it looked like he had a better chance," said one long-time SEIU member at the Edwards rally. "A lot of us are going to caucus for John."

~Snip~

More Here




Tomorrow is the day! Come on Everyone - Let's show the Media and the World that John Edwards is the One!



www.johnedwards.com/contribute
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Love this!
"Everyone knows our union wanted Edwards from the beginning but settled for Obama when it looked like he had a better chance," said one long-time SEIU member at the Edwards rally. "A lot of us are going to caucus for John."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. the SEIU has a history with Edwards..count on the fact that many many will caucus for John!!
the others will stay home!!

FLY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
be inspired Donating Member (305 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I sure hope you're right.
I really really hope you're right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pauldg0 Donating Member (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
60. I agree
Edwards has been in the trenches with all the labor unions the past five years straight. I don't know as much about Obama, but as far as Hillary is concerned....

. Would you vote for a member of the Board of Directors of Walmart...a company that sells predominately Chinese products.
. Also non-union.
. Also cozy with Republicans?

Yes, I think many will go Edwards way..............I'm praying..I want God to favor Edwards !! I am now an unemployed engineer in Detroit....off for more than six years.

GO JOHN EDWARDS 08
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Friends in Las Vegas have told me that the buzz is that many of the
Union members are not going to vote with their leadership. Word on the street is that the majority of the votes will go to Edwards. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Also a lot the Culinary Workers Union members..
are Not Happy with the endorsement of Obama. Who knows who the'll caucus for...some of them undoubtedly for Obama, but it's not a given. Members have expressed their displeasure at not being notified or asked to be part of the endorsement process. Apparently Union officials did this without involving the members. Could be a backlash there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
be inspired Donating Member (305 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. And they are being bullied.
The caucus sites set up along the strip are being used by the Obama camp for the purpose of herding culinary workers in there from their workplaces and then intimidating them into caucusing for Obama, from what I heard. Their bosses will be there and a caucus is very public, so many are feeling pressured. That pressure could work, or there could be a major backlash against it. I'm hoping for backlash.

Check this out from the Las Vegas Sun.

On top of that, Angers and DeFalco said, the reps handed Antuna an Obama pledge card, telling her she had to sign it to participate in the caucus and that today was the deadline.

"The lady told all of us: Nobody can go to the caucus unless you're voting for Obama," Angers said. "They have no right to do what they did. This is America. You should be able to vote for who you feel like. It doesn't matter who the union is endorsing. They can try to persuade us but it doesn't mean people have to vote for them."

But Antuna tells a different story. She said she was filling out a voter registration form when the union reps approached her about Obama. When she told them she wasn't sure about caucusing for him, one rep took her registration form, indeed telling her that she couldn't participate Saturday if she wasn't supporting Obama.

At that point, Antuna said, Angers and DeFalco, who were sitting at a neighboring table, engaged the union rep in a heated discussion. Antuna said she sat silent while both sides swapped words. She doesn't recall the bit about the pledge cards.

One key fact: The union reps spoke broken English.

"It's possible it was a miscommunication," Antuna said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. That is worrying.
I hope there are enough around with the courage to act in their own best interests, and not that of their union bosses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
be inspired Donating Member (305 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. This is part of the reason for the lawsuit.
There's a lawsuit going on to stop these caucus locations from being so close to the strip so that the workers can caucus without being intimidated by their coworkers and bosses. That's my understanding of what that suit is about, anyway. Hope it succeeds.

And John Kerry, who wouldn't stand up for our right to have our votes counted in 2004, has flown out to Nevada to make sure the on the strip caucus sites are left in place so that the voter intimidation on behalf of the candidate he's endorsed, Obama, can succeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashlarah Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #21
58. The casino caucuses will be getting a disproportionate
share of delegates, too.

Of roughly 10,000 delegates to Nevada's presidential-nominating convention, more than 700 could be selected at casino caucuses, depending upon turnout, which could make them more valuable than some sparsely populated Nevada counties, the lawsuit said.


http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=nevadacaucus17&date=20080117&query=casino+caucus+delegates

It is that part which troubles me, not that casino workers will have easy access to caucusing. As to being pressured, I hope there are many bloggers with video cameras at every casino caucus site. That should keep it honest. Maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. GO J.E.!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kingmaker is fine, but...
...this country NEEDS John to be our President!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. Edwards is in to make sure Obama beats Hillary.
The Republicans fear Hillary the most and they know she has reasonable chance to win the Presidency, especially after such a royal fuck-up like Bush. The Rovians and the MSM know that this nation is not ready to elect a Black man as President. Even blacks who would love for this to happen know this fact about American racism. They don't take pleasure in supporting HC over Obamas but they have been in the game long enough to know that they need to vote for a candidate most likely to be in a position of power when this election is over. Hillary would be the Repubs with the gender vote. It will be split with Obama at the top of the ticket and the Rethugs would win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
be inspired Donating Member (305 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Edwards is in to take America back
...from corporate politicians like Obama AND Hillary. All of us are screwed if either Obama or Hillary gets the nomination. It HAS to be Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. B.S.............Edwards is in it to become president..i guess you don't know the man!
or his wife..obviously you don't and you are spewing bullshit!
or in other words..spin..bullshit spin!
fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. No - John Edwards is in to win this.
I don't care for the King Maker comment, but it was a good article on the Union situation in Nevada. The Fat Lady hasn't even warmed up, and don't delude yourself, the Republicans want Hillary to win, she has the most baggage to swift boat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. No, Edwards is in becuase his supporters think he is the best person for the job. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
29. Your logic is correct but your premise is wrong
Edwards takes from Obama not Clinton. Clinton has from the begining hoped that there would be a three party race and not a 2 because her entrenched negatives are so high. In other words she knows that she can get 40% but not 51. This in fact is the exact strategy that propelled Bill into the Whitehouse by cleverly encouraging Perot into the race.

Some have whispered that there was clandestine Clinton help in helping Obama at the start but that they never calculated that he would get so popular so fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zazzle Donating Member (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
42. Washington and corporate lobbyists funded Obama's political career - until Jan. 07
when he "stopped" accepting their donations to run for prez based on "changing Washington" - ha!

If Obama had wanted to "change Washington" he could have stopped taking their bribe money when he CAME to Washington!

His only reason for rejecting their bribe money now is because Edwards has never taken a dime from Washington lobbyists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sparkleon Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Never, never
will JRE fade from the news or the media. John Edwards has class and appeals to just about everyone. I think he is very capable of becoming our next President, and I hope all Nevadians will turn out in huge crowds and give JRE their vote. He's the man that can! You heard it here first! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
13. " union members don't always vote with their leadership " - this can work for anyone
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 11:46 AM by robbedvoter
and d it's true - was never brought up before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zazzle Donating Member (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
41. Edwards is right - "corporate stranglehold on America"
Corporations control:
the media
the media pundits
the "news"
the debates
the debate questions
the polling
the voting machines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
15. Candidates plan, voters laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. .
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. It's true. Obama was planning his national campaign going into New Hampshire.
Candidates plan, voters laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. It's insulting and derisive and you damn well know it.
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 12:11 PM by redqueen
Please note how I'm not stooping to your level to insult Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I would be terribly offended
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 12:13 PM by Occam Bandage
if you were to use an aphorism to counter a silly claim by Barack Obama.

Oh, no, wait, I wouldn't, because my skin is thicker than a sheet of rice paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Do you see me in positive Obama threads, stirring up shit?
This isn't about me having thin skin. It's about my decreasing tolerance for substanceless shit-stirring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Sorry to have run afoul of your decreased tolerance.
I find the turf mentality of minority candidates to be hypocritical. Sure, you have no problem with people outright attacking endorsement-celebration threads, or inserting "shuck-and-jive" or "Reagan" remarks in pro-Clinton or pro-Obama threads.

But someone dare say something ambiguously negative in a pro-Edwards or pro-Kucinich thread? Outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Whatever. You don't pay enough attention, obviously. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #35
62. "ambiguously negative..."
Oh - is that what you are? Congratulations!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
16. He'll be excluded from debates soon and, since he didn't stand up for Kucinich,

he'll have no one to blame but himself. The media, or more accurately the media's corporate owners, want the race narrowed down to be between Clinton and Obama, figuring that any Republican white man can beat a black man or a woman. That's their strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. "since he didn't stand up for Kucinich"
What in the hell does that mean? and what does it have to do with the rest of your "argument"? Hey, I feel for DK, but face it, he doesn't have the organization and single digit numbers, both in polls and votes, is not John Edwards problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. Well, more to the point, he conspired with Hillary to keep Kucinich off-stage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Ohh, and let's see -
that was over seven months ago, and since we all know what kind of power Edwards welds in the media...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Karma's karma. He pushed out Gravel and tried to push out Kucinich. Now he's the victim
of the same force he tried to wield.

(Edwards seemed to do pretty well with the media in the 2004 primaries, didn't he?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. In 2004, there wasn't a woman and
a black man in the race, and why I am even bothering here is beyond me, but seriously? John Edwards hasn't pushed anyone out and your claim is outrageous and flame bait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. "Our guys should talk," Clinton said. Gravel was not invited to the next debate.
2004 had a black woman in the race, and yet she didn't get any coverage at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Proof? Link that Edwards
actually had the power to exclude Gravel. And as for Carol Moseley Braun:


If there was tremendous promise in Carol Moseley Braun's career in 1992, it had very much dissipated by 1998. There was a sense that she had squandered a tremendous opportunity. For starters, she was accused of (though never formally charged with) campaign finance irregularities, her then-fiance (and campaign manager) was accused of sexual harassment by female campaign workers, and her "private" trip to Nigeria in 1996, where she visited with and defended dictator Sani Abacha, was widely panned, even by many Democrats. Considerably outspent, she lost her bid for re-election in 1998, the only Democratic incumbent to be ousted that year, and the first Illinois Democrat to lose a Senate race in 20 years. (She was subsequently appointed by President Clinton as ambassador to New Zealand.)

in that context, it seems a bit surprising to find Moseley Braun throwing her hat into the presidential ring. Her late entry into the race may help explain her paltry fund-raising totals for the first quarter of 2003 ($72,000), but in a process where money brings media attention and supporters, she is well behind the other eight White House wannabes.
http://www.npr.org/programs/specials/democrats2004/braun.html



I think you are just an attention seeker.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Denial runs deep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. If you can not provide proof and
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 01:45 PM by waiting for hope
resort to poo flinging, I suggest you piss off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. OOPS... My Head Is Splitting Open... Migraine... Just Donated...
wrong day... do it again tomorrow! So stupid!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. LOL!
I don't think anyone is going to mind!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
27. Just curious ... has Obama stood with SEIU or Culinary Workers when they were on strike?
I know that John Edwards actually picketed with some of them, what did Obama do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. It's kinda like the Ned Lamont thing -
Don't do something based on Principal and Decency, do it because you think you'll get something BIG in return. When are people going to realize the bigger picture? Speaking of Pictures, I think I'll try to email this to Ned Lamont:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
48. Really great picture.
I remember that day well. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #30
51. Makes me sorry I sent Lamont a dime...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. That's was a big disapointment...
I was hoping for him to try another run at an elected office but it seems he wants to buy .. oops, endorse his way in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benny05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
33. JRE is in the driver's seat
Lot more than the MSM give him credit for. He will force a brokered convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
34. Didn't think he would. The man has conviction...
...and I'm glad he's not afraid to show it this time around.

:patriot:

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
37. Will be in Las Vegas Saturday!
My wife and I are taking a small getaway this Saturday to Las Vegas, but be sure we'll be wearing our John Edwards buttons around the the casino's!!!! Go John!!! :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #37
46. Yay you!
:yourock:

And good luck. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
47. Yeah - Self Kicking....
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
49. This needs more of this:
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 04:11 PM by Nutmegger
:bounce::kick::bounce::kick::bounce::kick::bounce::kick::bounce::kick::bounce::kick::bounce:
:bounce::woohoo::bounce::woohoo::bounce::woohoo::bounce::woohoo::bounce::woohoo:
:bounce::kick::bounce::kick::bounce::kick::bounce::kick::bounce::kick::bounce::kick::bounce:
:bounce::woohoo::bounce::woohoo::bounce::woohoo::bounce::woohoo::bounce::woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Thanks Nutmegger!
:hi: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: all the way to the White House!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
53. Edwards has the strongest platform and is the most courageous.
Edwards will definitely hang in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judaspriestess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
54. I remember when the realtors association in Las Vegas endorsed
john ensign for senator (when he ran against Harry Reid). I was hopping mad, as I sure as hell did not endorse this asswipe and I wanted to know who in the hell decided it was ok to endorse someone without asking for my permission.

I'm sure there are a lot of culinary union members who did not agree with the Obama endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pamela Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
55. Thanks for this.
The comments are good, too. Lots of people talking about tomorrow's fundraiser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bratfavre Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
56. I respectfully believe Edwards is toast n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stravu9 Donating Member (945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
57. Go, Johnny, Go. Go, Go!
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
59. I created a Video, attacking the MSM and in support of "Go for the Gold" $7 MILLION 1 DAY FUNDRAISER
You can check it out here. I have two versions this link is the REVISED Version. Corrected some glitches and took the effects out of the VO.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...


This is the original version.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

I composed the background music as well, if anyone is interested.

Also if you guys could go to youtube and rate it, would be really sweet. And hopefully more coverage.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #59
64. Part of the url was missing..... CRAP, now I have to hunt down my other post to correct 'em if I can
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
61. Edwards is polling the best among union members in Nevada
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
63. I just donated--I hope that they start Friday on East coast time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC