Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Matthews: I Wronged Clinton With Remark

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:36 PM
Original message
Matthews: I Wronged Clinton With Remark
Matthews: I Wronged Clinton With Remark

By DAVID BAUDER – 24 minutes ago

NEW YORK (AP) — With protests rumbling, MSNBC's Chris Matthews said Thursday that he was wrong to say last week that the reason Hillary Clinton is a senator and a candidate for president "is that her husband messed around."

Matthews discussed those remarks at the opening of his show "Hardball" Thursday, the same day feminist leader Gloria Steinem and the heads of four prominent women's groups complained in a letter to his boss that Matthews had shown a pattern of sexism.

"Was it fair to imply that Hillary's whole career depended on being a victim of an unfaithful husband? No," Matthews said. "That's what it sounded like I was saying and it hurt people I'd like to think normally like what I say (and), in fact, like me."

He said that while he has not always taken the time to say things right or be appropriate, "I will try to be clearer, smarter, more obviously in support of the right of women, of all people, to full equality of respect and ambition."

Matthews made the remarks about Clinton on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" program Jan. 9, the day after the New Hampshire primary. Clinton's surprise victory in the primary was ascribed, in small part, on women angry that the press corps seemed to write her off after losing in Iowa.

On the program, Matthews said: "Let's not forget, and I'll be brutal, the reason she's a U.S. senator, the reason she's a candidate for president, the reason she may be a front-runner, is that her husband messed around."

He explained in a later interview with The Associated Press that it was a reference to New York Democrats asking her to run for Senate when she showed dignity in the face of the Monica Lewinsky scandal. He called it an "unexceptional statement."

But now, Matthews said Thursday, "I get it."

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5j37PU4cG6xaIwx9t9nvYJZNA0NBgD8U7VNE80

==================================================================================================


It's a day late and a dollar short for me. I feel the only reason he came out with this is because of all the complaints that MSNBC received.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bingo. If there hadn't been vociferous complaints, he'd have continued
without apology.

He's only sorry he got caught in a firestorm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Thank you Media Matters
They really brought this one to the forefront. And I know there are many links to it here but I'll offer one more
http://mediamatters.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Must have been a lovely blaze.
I'd love accurate statistics on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Take a look at Media Matters' page on Matthews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. OMG, he is composed of a quivering, jelly like substance .
A little noodge, on way or the other, and he gets all flibberty jibberty.

:eyes:

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kudos to all of those who went to the trouble of complaining.
It feels good to see Matthews eat some humble pie for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Of course it's because it was because of complaints,
and talk about being disengenuous! He made it seem as though it was about one statement he made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. its not about forgiveness, its about the sweet taste of a victory.
I like to think my phone call helped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. Go back to screwin' yourself Matthews.....stink up the airwaves as usual
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dude_CalmDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. If he's going to apologize for saying a bunch of stupid shit...
...he'd better get some coffee and throat lozenges because it's going to be a long couple of days.

Why apologize for this? Other than the hate mail, he does this kind of shit all the time and he does it to give himself some semblance of legitimacy. So that the few dumb enough out there to heed any word that comes out of his pie hole can rest assured that if Tweety says something ridiculously biased, stupid, racist, sexist, etc., etc. - that he'll apologize and call himself out on it. Lay down a little harmless to oneself piece of truth that's already obvious to everyone on earth and he's got credit to continue being the same asshat he's always been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Corporations always want the most corporate candidate
Guess he got reprimanded?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. ONE remark that wasn't what was in his "heart."
MediaMatters has a whole compendium of his history of sexist remarks -- it's a pattern that's gone on for years!

This is like the typical "Do SOMEthing so you can say you did something."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Sexism is okay in our society. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzShellG Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hmmmm....
It just seems Chris doesn't want another New Hampshire-esque vote blamed on him dissing Hillary. He's just choosing his words carefully this time. I don't think his feelings about her has changed one bit. Nor should they.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I don't care if he loves or hates a candidate, it gives him no right to be a sexist PIG!
0ink, 0ink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC