Obama Camp Hits Back At Hillary's Reagan Criticism

Yes, and that is why Hillary is my last choice for the nomination.

is almost as bad as any run by the Bush/Rove team...I am disliking her and her surrogates more and more as this race goes on-go Edwards and if not then go Obama ABH

The level of enthusiam I'd have if Edwards or Obama is our nominee has been growing. But the Clinton's Rovian smears are going to make it hard for me to pull the lever for her if she is our nominee.

I can tell you that my support goes to Obama and NOT TO CLINTON-and if Mike Bloomberg ends up running I may hold my nose and vote for an independent in November

Obama + Reagan SUCKS, just as Clinton + Bush SUCKS

Clinton enabled Bush's worst policy.

He threw liberals under the bus while pandering to indies and Republicans ~ I don't care if he's not yet able to make policy decisions based on it.

and it just makes me too sick to try and parse it out any further.

anything right on here?

That would put the time period clearly in Clinton's camp would it not? Perhaps Obama meant Gingrich's Contract On America do nothing Repugnant Congress.

Guess we'll never know. We are presently almost 16 years out now from Clinton's election. Before that was 4 years of daddy bush and then we get back to Raygun.

I'd say Obama really is gonna take a serious hit for pandering to the RayGun ratpack. Hope he's working on damage control right now.

He's got zero credibility with me at the moment and he won't get much of it back by harping on the "I was against IWR" issue. Making statements in support of Raygun is almost the same as voting for another new war against some tiny, impoverished 3rd world country like Grenada or Nicaragua. This puts him in a warmonger category like Hilllary and JE as far as I'm concerned.

No shit.

such sad desperation.

and he's just digging that hole a little deeper. It's much better to be on offense instead of defense and Obama's off-the-cuff pro-Reagan riff isn't helping him ... at all.

This story is dominating the news cycle the day before the Caucus and those on the fence, so to speak, who remember Reagan and his Republicans well -- and despise them accordingly -- may find themselves wondering 'just what DON'T I know about this seemingly nice man I know so little about?' and thinking twice before caucusing for Obama.

it's like Hillarite Fever

I could type any words in there and get stories to come up.

try this out:
http://news.google.com/news?oe=utf-8&hl=en&q=clinton+suppression&btnG=Search

Clinton Voter Suppression dominates the News!

They will be the big story tonite on cable news going into the caucus.

The endless cycle loves fresh meat especially ones with soundbites.

What if people would actually vote for her based on her merit rather than her manipulation?

I think your reliance on cable news will prove misplaced.

but even my Dad -- who avoids politics like the plague -- called me wanting to know what Obama said about liking Reagan.

Enjoy your bubble, though.

and I hope he doesn't try pulling out anymore trick shots like that. If he wants to corner the market on the conservative rightwing vote, he should switch parties and run on the Repug ticket. You can't have your cake and eat it too.

Deliberately misleading. I wonder what people who first hear those comments think after hearing Obama's real comments?

I would be pretty insulted. It's one thing to correctly interpret someone's comment and debunk it. But to deliberate misinterpret it and mislead Americans? That's low.

Hillary is battering him with his own words and it obviously stings.

"Senator Obama has been fighting for progressive ideals for over two decades."

Where was Obama for Kyl Lieberman?

Where was Obama when MoveOn was attacked?

Why did he vote present more times than any other IL state legislator?

That's fighting for progressive ideals?

but not your own (or HRC's LIES) facts. :thumbsdown:

Where was Hillary for Kyl Lieberman? Oh yeah, she was voting FOR it.
and where was Hillary when MoveOn was attacked? Oh yeah, she was condemning MoveOn.

:eyes:

:kick: for

judgment and lack of ability to rise about this crap concerns me.

For some time now, Hillary and her minions have been either grotesquely twisting what Obama says (he did not use a superlative when referring to Raygun, he was talking about trajectory, i.e., change) or just making sh*t up entirely and riffing off it (like Rangle going off on an alleged comment by Obama that Obama never made).

Even the cynical pundits like Olbermann, Stewart and Colbert have called attention to this lame strategy.

The Clinton campaign strategy of anything goes is on its own downhill trajectory and they are trying to drag the entire election process and everybody else down into the gutter where they are most comfortable fighting.

I would say it is Clinton that has an affinity for the GOP since she is mimicking their nasty gutter politics.

So much for HRC's illustrious "Pro-Life" or nurturing "it takes a village" B.S. :thumbsdown:

To HRC, *it takes a village* of maimed and decapitated Iraqis, Afghans and Palestinians in order to keep our illustrious manufactures of these DUMB (Cluster) Bombs in business. :nuke:

...what a bunch of fucking losers...

THIS is the best they cna come up with?

This is IT?

:eyes:

So Obama didn 't say the republican ideas were better than the democratic ones.

Obama implied the republican ideas were better than all parties.