Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is it that when 90+% of black voters supported Clinton, Gore, and Kerry, it meant that they

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:47 PM
Original message
Why is it that when 90+% of black voters supported Clinton, Gore, and Kerry, it meant that they
were great candidates who did a masterful job of reaching out to a diverse range of voters, yet when 59% of black Democratic voters support Barack Obama, it means that they were 1) tricked; 2) are racist; 3) don't know what the hell they're doing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. You are probably comparing general election numbers to primary numbers. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who said that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Just look around
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I'm not understanding you
How does that article reflect what you said in the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. No one said that as far as I know except the person who
started this thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Then you're just not paying attention.
Edited on Fri Jan-18-08 10:56 PM by EffieBlack
Poll: Obama makes big gains among black voters

"see dirty politics works"

"evidently they heard Michelle telling them to "wake up and get it". If not, perhaps they were afraid they'd be accused of having a "slave mentality" if they dared vote for anyone else."

"The Swiftboating of Clinton on Race has been a Rovian success for Obama. You'd think Obama would be a better man than this."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. It means they have nowhere else to go as Republicans campaign on hating blacks
That's why :tinfoilhat:bama's love of Reagan is so despicable. If you think :tinfoilhat:bama is electable under the electoral college then drink some more Kool-aid :spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. So basically you are implying that we shouldn't vote for
Obama because he is black and that makes him unelectable as president. Wow.... what a thing to criticize him for... His skin color... you should be proud. Ohh and show me proof of how Obama loves reagan. I would get on you about not showing enough respect to actually put the O in his name but at least you didn't "accidentally" write Osama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. He could probably get away with the skin color but the name is unelectable
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 01:34 AM by billbuckhead
Sadly, he brings little to the table except his color and can't overcome the name "Barack Hussein Obama". He can't win and Hillary can win and profoundly change the world. Women are 52% of voters and have never won vs what........................What else is Obama really bringing to the table? Charles Krauhammer laughingly proclaiming Obama is blowback to white liberals. (Yeah, they should have been like him, supporting the almost openly racist Republicans)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Keep thinking that. And if that's the basis on which people think Obama can be beaten, I'll enjoy
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 12:17 PM by EffieBlack
watching him eat their lunch - again.

To paraphrase a line from the film, "The American President:

If you want to beat Barack Obama, you'd better come at him with more than his middle name and a pigment sample.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. I agree, EffieBlack. Because the supporters are black, it's now a
yawner because Obama is, yet when Clinton was declared 'the black president', that was exciting.
I'll admit I was guilty of that, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. Just another way racist thinking rears its head, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. Here is how I heard it explained on a couple of channels.
One reporter said that if it ended up Obama with primarily black
votes--it would be seen as more of a "favorite son" vote.

If say Kerry gets black votes in large numbers, it stands
to reason that Obama would be expected to get large numbers of'
white votes.

This is simply explaining what I heard on CNN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why?
The Clinton machine thought they had the Black vote sewn up a long time ago.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. What does this have to do with my question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. Because in DU land during primary season anyone
who opposes their chosen candidate is reviled...

then, when the candidate is finally chosen we all bury the hatchett and it becomes a big love fest...until....

the candidate loses the election...

the we are back to bickering...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
15. I can say you have never seen me write anything like
that in your 1, 2 and 3 and I would say HRC supporters have not tried to belittle any blacks, latinos or whites.

It was Michelle Obama that first injected race and when Sen. Barack Obama inevitably loses in his bid in the Democratic Primary, his wife has already started laying the foundation of blame.And who is Michelle Obama laying the early blame on? Black people.

Michelle Obama thinks that if her hubby doesn’t win, it’s because black folk don’t have enough self-esteem:Michelle also tells the black community that they should be voting for her hubby for no other reason than they share the same color skin.

Now imagine that the white wife of a white senator blamed their campaign woes on the low self esteem of the black community…



addendum: Early on Mrs Obama gave an interview to msnbc and said the following:Reporter: “The polls are showing your husband is trailing Hillary by 46% to 37% in the African-American community. What’s going on here?”

Mrs. Obama: “First of all, I think that that’s not going to hold. I’m completely confident: black America will wake up, and get . But what we’re dealing with in the black community is just the natural fear of possibility.

Well, as we see in the polls obama has a big majority of the black folk and when he loses I wonder if she will still blame the black folks for his losing the nomination?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJObamaWoman Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yet you fail to mention HRC's pollster who basically said screw
the black vote. Why would any black person, especially undecideds vote for HRC when from her own people they say that black votes don't matter because the Hispanics are going to vote for her. Then he talked about the problems that the "blacks" and "browns" have. Michelle may have been wrong but HRC and her people are just as bad if not worse. They have not done anything to make me vote for her if she does get the nod over Barack. Its sad because I don't want to vote for a republican, nor do I feel right by not voting since my ancestors (blacks & women) struggled to get the right to vote. But this is what HRC has done to me. She has offended me as a black woman and all that is just and right I hope she gets her behind handed to her. HRC is a frigid and dirty politician.

Whats even sadder is that I loved the Clintons when I was younger. I remember watching him win the election the first time as a child. Up until a few weeks ago I was still going to vote for HRC if BO didn't get the nod. I even defended her when a white co-worker said that HRC was terrible. I'm just sick of the damn Clinton's. They have not done anything for me nor my family. I resent the hell out of people saying that they were for Blacks. In my eyes the Clinton legacy has been tarnished and they need to step the hell off before it gets worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ripple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Any quotes to back up your wild assertions?
The quote you provided applies to every race, gender, and demographic. Michelle was asked specifically about black voters and she replied with confidence that they would "get it" and warm to Obama. Most, if not all candidates make similar statements, such as "I'm confident that once Nevada voters have a chance to listen to candidate X, they will 'get' why we are so excited about him."

Spin is one thing, but bullshit is bullshit. Ben David, your post falls into the latter category.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. The notion that Michelle Obama is the reason that race is an issue in this campaign is laughable
and could only be posited by someone who is either not paying any attention or who thinks that the people they're addressing are stupid.

Either way, your assertion is bull.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
18. There wasn't "a choice" and the operative word about this is in past tense (were). eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemIdeals Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
20. Because Hillary can't stand that blacks don't feel she is entitled to their votes
She just can't stand it.

Cryyyy me a riverr, Hillary.

Most black votes now belong to Obama, as the song goes.

I saw the % of black uncommitted voters in the Michigan primary. Hillary was the only major candidate on the Dem ballot and something like 63% of blacks voted uncommitted rather than put a check next to her name.

She draws huge chunks of support from the religious and the elderly in our party, groups which are shrinking in percentage as the Democratic Party becomes younger and more open-minded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Why do you think this is about Hillary?
The media, political pundits, DUers (and not just the Hillary supporters), and many others demostrate this same biased cognitive dissonance.

Frankly, I'm growing weary of having various candidates' supporters trying to turn virtually every discussion, regardless the topic, into a forum for bashing other candidates. Sometimes it is possible to raise a question or discuss an issue without it being about which candidate is more evil than the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC