Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Memo From Obama Campaign Manager Plouffe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:06 PM
Original message
Memo From Obama Campaign Manager Plouffe
Memo From Obama Campaign Manager Plouffe

TO: Interested Parties

FR: David Plouffe

DA: January 19, 2008

RE: The Clintons and the Discredited Caucus

Barack Obama is very proud of the effort that he and his campaign have made in Nevada. As people head to their Caucus sites this morning, we have closed over a 25-point gap in a state where Hillary Clinton was the choice of much of the political establishment and enjoyed huge advantages in terms of name identification. In a very short period of time, our campaign has built an amazing grassroots network and has brought thousands of Independents and disillusioned Republicans into the Democratic Party. These efforts will go a long way to ensuring that Senator Obama wins this critical swing state when he is the nominee.

We expect to do well today and a win in Nevada for Obama would be a significant upset. As University of Nevada Reno Political Science professor put it – “If she loses Nevada, it’s not just a loss. It’s a collapse.”

Our hope is that today’s caucus comes off without a hitch and as many people as possible participate, however we remain concerned that the tactics of the Clinton Campaign and their allies in recent days have confused voters and could lower participation.

And now, according to Jon Ralston, allies of the Clinton Campaign may be planning to challenge voters at the at-large precincts. It is a sad day when Democrats start trying to suppress the vote of other Democrats.

Beginning with the lawsuit filed by their allies to suppress turnout among union members, the Clinton Campaign has been engaged in a systematic effort to discredit the process – a process which was pushed, developed, and approved by their supporters at the Democratic National Committee and in Nevada. It wasn’t until Obama began gaining strength in a state they expected to win by at least 20 points that they began their attempts to delegitimize the process.

Former President Clinton said that this caucus “was not like an election” and that it disenfranchised voters. Even though the lawsuit was rejected as completely meritless by a federal judge, we remain concerned that the specter of the lawsuit has confused voters and threatens turnout at the at-large precincts, which may have been the intent of the Clinton allies all along.

The Clinton Campaign has also repeated the efforts it made in the closing days of the New Hampshire primary by launching knowingly false attacks on Barack’s opposition to Yucca, his 100-percent pro-choice rating, and position on Social Security. There have been push polls and robocalls pushing these false attacks.

And just last night, former President Clinton made two false and outrageous allegations, distorting a radio ad that does not even mention Senator Clinton and accusing the Culinary workers, whose support both Clintons furiously sought, of engaging in deliberate voter suppression. (See full story on the comments below.)

The conduct of the Clinton Campaign in recent weeks essentially makes the case for why we need Barack Obama – it’s the same old-style say anything or do anything to win, divisive attacks that have prevented progress in this country for so long.

http://thepage.time.com/2008/01/19/obama-campaign-slams-clinton-efforts-to-discredit-nevada-caucuses/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Viva Obama!!! And on to SC.
The Clinton camp by proxy filed the lawsuit to suppress the vote. Will they renounce the win on the basis of the specious allegations they are making? My guess would be no. What a sad pathetic spectacle of poor sportsmanship they are showing already. This is going to be a long-ass primary ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. it's already forgotten..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. thanks for the link
No worries. People that care about democracy won't forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. I still say caucus ia not like an election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alizaryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. I was hoping for a win but considering the
"machine" and its (his and her) garbage he did real well. Onwards and upwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Obama's whole campaign is "about to go Plouffe" -
He's fading at least!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. in your mind maybe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. hip hip hoorraaaayyyyy!
:rofl::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think he needs to take her on head to head in the next debate.
Not just attack with snide remarks but engage her on why she thought George W. Bush deserved a blank check to invade Iraq. Go after her in an honest, fair way. Last debate the punditocracy said that there was no difference between the three on Iraq. That is not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. If allowed to ask a question, he should ask, "Why the hell did you vote for war?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Yes, he should take her on head to head..
you have to promise not to cry foul though...she'll hand him his ass, if he's dumb enough to take her on, rather than drop out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. "lawsuit filed by allies" yet 527 ads are THEIR allies...can't do a thing about it
What a bunch of hypocritical cry-babies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. Somebodys cranky...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hmmm...maybe people are catching on to his lies and being
turned off...such as his spanish-language radio ad...even turned Edwards against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alizaryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. HIS lies?
The Clintons calling anything a lie is as credible as Bush's rational for war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC