Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reid got his way ...government employees won for Hillary - private sector

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:19 PM
Original message
Reid got his way ...government employees won for Hillary - private sector
who had to work ...were screwed. Mining employees and casino workers not on the strip who had to work today couldn't caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. So in other words....
It wasn't skewed to give the CWU voters enough of an unfair advantage over other workers as far as you're concerned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. let's put it this way, there are 24 hour workplaces statewide, large casinos
at Tahoe, West Wendover, Jackpot, Elko, Washoe County (Reno/Sparks) and then you have the mines. They never shut down. So everyone working at those sites today did not get to caucus. All private sector taxpayers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Nope it's the dames that will take her all the way. Count on it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. No matter when you have a caucus...
Someone will be working. That's a big reason why they suck. But the answer is not to give a particular union an unfair advantage. The solution is to switch to a voting system, and make absentee ballots easy to obtain via an online request. That way everyone that wants to have a voice gets and EQUAL voice, which was not the case in special arrangements made for CWU members. And yet Obama still didn't win, even with the extra help from the state party and the DNC that created the special advantage for CWU members (either that, or they didn't toe their union party line).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hillary prevailed despite union intimidation and Obama's slimy
Spanish radio ad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Yeah, because endorsement don't mean jack...
I mean come on, do any of YOU vote for a particular candidate because someone else endorsed them? I'm in the habit of thinking for myself. The ONLY time I pay any attention to an endorsement is in non-partisan local races where the candidate may be trying to hide that s/he is really a rethug, or favors rethug policies. Otherwise endorsements don't mean jack squat to me -- and never have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Go make some whine with those sour grapes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. waaaa. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not that simple
Hillary did not own the Gov't workers, nor did Obama own the CWU. People on both sides have to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. I expected this little from you. Thanks for taking a dump on our day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. you are welcome. I live here. I know who in my family couldn't caucus
today because they had to work in Reno.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC