Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leading Dems to Bill.... STFU

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
peoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:39 PM
Original message
Leading Dems to Bill.... STFU
Prominent Democrats are upset with the aggressive role that Bill Clinton is playing in the 2008 campaign, a role they believe is inappropriate for a former president and the titular head of the Democratic Party. In recent weeks, Sen. Edward Kennedy and Rep. Rahm Emanuel, both currently neutral in the Democratic contest, have told their old friend heatedly on the phone that he needs to change his tone and stop attacking Sen. Barack Obama, according to two sources familiar with the conversations who asked for anonymity because of their sensitive nature. Clinton, Kennedy and Emanuel all declined to comment.

On balance, aides to both Bill and Hillary still see Bill as a huge net plus in fund-raising, attracting large crowds and providing a megaphone to raise doubts about Obama—even if some of those doubts are distortions. But there's concern that in hatcheting the Illinois senator and losing his temper with the news media (last week he thrashed a San Francisco TV reporter for asking about a lawsuit filed by Clinton-backing teachers union members to limit the number of Nevada caucuses), Clinton is drawing down his political capital and harming his role as a global statesman. "This is excruciating," says a member of the Clintons' circle, who asked for anonymity. "But the stakes couldn't be higher. It's worth it to tarnish himself a bit now to win the presidency."

http://www.newsweek.com/id/96385
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why would he change his tactics if they're working? He's not worried about
what happens to the Democratic party--he never was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yes, it's time to catch on that when it comes to HRC and Bill Clinton's DLC, It's ALL about THEM!
:grr: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. that's it. and if he doesn't step back this behind the scenes
criticism is going to go public. I can also see people like Kennedy and perhaps even Gore, endorsing Obama if he doesn't ease off. He doesn't have to stop campaigning for Hillary, but it's clear that he's taking a risk with his behavior. You don't want to piss off Teddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Especially if he's driving.
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Imagine being in the Whitehouse with 'The First Husband'
x(

And we thought Bush's cabinet were rubber stamps....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good for Teddy and Rahm . . .
Bill has become an embarrassing cancer on the body politic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. no matter who you are, you don't want Rahm on your bad side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. As an impartial observer who only somewhat has been following Bill's news,
I get the growing feeling that he's becoming (or has become) somewhat of a loose cannon.

What do you Hillary folks think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Hillary better rein in her husband or
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 04:49 PM by rosesaylavee
he's going to lose the campaign for her. Is she running or is he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Probably caught something from GHWB. Bill may have caught some
kind of Repug methodology virus or something. Bill needs to dial it back a lot...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's called ENTITLEMENT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Exactly who is running for President again?
"It's worth it to tarnish himself a bit now to win the presidency."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Konza Donating Member (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. It's Bill's Third Term! Ssshhh, don't tell Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. Bill Clinton has always broken the "rules". This cat won't change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Newsweek validates my point
Remember my post "Bill Clinton: Unprecedented bad behavior for a former president." Now Kennedy and Emmanuel agree wth me. I don't feel quite as much of a lone wolf after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. I don't conceive of it as "bad behavior". Its politics, they all do it one way or another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. Screw the "leading dems". Bill Clinton can do what he wants. He da man!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Isn't that how we lost the Congress in 1994? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Yeah he does feel that way. Ergo hummers in the oval office.
Sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. He wants back in the WH so bad
he can taste it. Can you say 3rd term?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. Bill has to be aggressive, the sexist media won't allow Hillary
to be tough...they'll interpret that as shrill and cackling--like so many Obama supporters here. Until there's a level palying field, Ted and Emmaneul shoudl STFU themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. "It's worth it to tarnish himself a bit now to win the presidency."
Well, at least the inner circle is admitting it to themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. And yet supporters will see that
and still not care. I do not understand people at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I'm with you.
I'm just baffled this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. Lots of non-prominent Democrats feel the same way.
No one expected him to sit on the sidelines, but one wonders just how low Bill will go to win one for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. Oh look ! Another "anonymous sources" article......just love those.


MSM: Don't have a story? Make one up with anonymous sources. They'll believe it. They'll believe anything. The days of "on the record" are so, so ......Nixonian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC